Posted on 09/13/2021 8:08:52 PM PDT by ransomnote
God’s will be done.
Well Done.
I did a search on Twttr on General Dynamics. Lots of retwts, but I don’t see a source.
https://twitter.com/search?q=general%20dynamics&src=typed_query&f=live
Question:
Guess who is in charge of professional ethics at NIH where Anthony Fauci is located ?
Answer :
Dr Christine Grady (A/K/A : Mrs. Anthony Fauci )
“Dr Anthony Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, is married to Dr Christine Grady.
Dr Grady, 68, is a nurse-bioethicist who is currently Chief of the Department of Bioethics at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Clinical Center. “
News Source :
https://www.the-sun.com/news/1796332/dr-anthony-fauci-wife-christine-grady-coronavirus/
Now for real investigative journalism, or a ‘peek behind the curtain’, check out what the responsibilities are of a bio-ethicist at NIH for enlightenment.
16 posted on 9/17/2021, 11:41:51 AM by Tilted Irish Kilt
https://healthcare.utah.edu/healthfeed/postings/2021/07/blood-clotting-covid19.php
https://hms.harvard.edu/news/covid-19-blood-clots
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33217420/
https://www.medscape.org/viewarticle/950341
https://www.bmj.com/content/374/bmj.n1931
hmmmm ...
Delicious.
The Great Awakening.
Wow, that is a great story. I always noticed how after every flu season, it would be on “the news” that they once again didn’t guess right about the flu strains targeted by the vax. They’d push the “get your flu shot!” propaganda, and later admit it was useless.
I think we are still yawning though. Not fully roused. But promising signs.
HoneysuckleTN wrote:
🚨🚨BREAKING🚨🚨: General Dynamics Corporation CANCELS Vaccine mandate after roughly 40% of employees decline the jab & threaten to walk.— Will Rockenbach (@WillRock2424) September 17, 2021
Seen on another twttr thread also; posted by someone named Al Webb:
https://twitter.com/alwebbj/status/1439025291054264323
https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/standardinterpretations/1987-08-06
Standard Interpretations OSHA policy regarding medical surveillance requirements
Alert: Due to routine maintenance on the OSHA website, some pages may be temporarily unavailable.
To report an emergency, file a complaint with OSHA or ask a safety and health question, call 1-800-321-6742 (OSHA).
Standard Number: 1910.1025
OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA’s interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA’s website at https://www.osha.gov.
August 6, 1987
The Honorable Sam Gejdenson
House of Representatives
Washington, D.C. 20515
Dear Congressman Gejdenson:
This is in response to your letter of June 26 on behalf of your constituent, Kenneth E. Jacobs, a shop steward for Boilermakers Local - 614 in Groton, Connecticut. Mr. Jacobs represents an employee who was required by his employer to submit to a medical examination in order to prevent lead related illnesses.
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) policy regarding medical surveillance requirements is that the employer must make the medical examination available, at no cost, to the employee, but the employee, is not required to take the examination. OSHA does not require an employer to force the employees to take medical examinations. However, OSHA’s regulations are intended as minimum standards. Employers can adopt more stringent requirements for themselves, and in doing so, may enforce mandatory participation in programs within the guidelines of labor/management relations.
The medical surveillance provisions of OSHA’s lead standard contain a multiple physicians review mechanism which gives workers an opportunity to obtain a second and possibly third opinion regarding the medical determinations made pursuant to the standard (29 CFR 1910.1025(j)(3)(iii)). An employee may designate a second physician to review any findings, determinations or recommendations of an initial physician chosen by the employer.
In dealing with the public in the matter of medical surveillance, OSHA realizes that many tests may be considered invasive of personal privacy. In addition, many persons only trust medical personnel that they select themselves. Nevertheless, OSHA encourages employees to participate in medical surveillance programs. Such programs can often detect changes in an employee’s health status, so that the individual’s exposure conditions can be corrected before serious damage is done.
We hope this information will be of help to you and your constituent. If we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to call on us.
Sincerely,
John A. Pendergrass
Assistant Secretary
nite
G’nite to you too!
Needs to happen more often pic.twitter.com/0gCUoGf3ud— Steve Inman (@SteveInmanUIC) September 10, 2021
INSANITY RULES IN PA SCHOOL:
High School Requires That 11th Grade Boy Undress With Girls To Promote Tolerance
Joe Mullins JOE MULLINS SEPTEMBER 17, 2021
The left gets more insane by the day. A Pennsylvania high school requires that an 11th grade boy undresses with girls to promote tolerance. Yes, you read that right.
Here is more, per Breitbart:
A teenage boy and his parents have filed a lawsuit against a Pennsylvania high school saying that administrators tried to shame the boy for being “intolerant” and demanded that he undress with girls in the school locker room to “make it seem natural.”
Sounds like another box of “cover our asses”. I guess this will get going around 2030!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.