Day 545 of “15 Days to ‘Flatten the Curve’” – Year 2, Month 6: “9/11 Style Event” Edition
Vanity | September 9, 2021 | Me
Posted on 9/10/2021, 7:26:24 PM by CheshireTheCat
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3993748/posts
ThankQs, CtC !
This may have been posted before but there’s a section that applies to military personnel; court case about EUA type shots:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3993721/posts?page=77#77
Catherine Austin Fitts has been an opponent of FedGov abuse for a while and is the leader of the Solari report. The Solari report published the following:
The title of the document is:
Form for Employees Whose Employers Are Requiring Covid-19 Injections
under Emergency Use Authorization
(The Solari Report, revised July 22, 2021)
An extract from the form states:
== quote ==
EUA products are unapproved, unlicensed, and experimental. Under the Nuremberg Code—the foundation of ethical medicine—no one may be coerced to participate in a medical experiment. The individual’s consent is absolutely essential. No court has ever upheld a mandate for an EUA vaccine. In Doe #1 v. Rumsfeld, 297 F. Supp. 2d 119 (2003),5 a federal court held that the U.S. military could not mandate EUA vaccines for soldiers: “[T]he United States cannot demand that members of the armed forces also
serve as guinea pigs for experimental drugs” (Id. at 135).
== quote ==
If this is true, precedent is set. In my opinion, the resident, even if his placement in the position was valid, does not have the authority to force the shots on the military. Of course there are a number of but lickers that will act on it anyway (misspellings intended).
This form originated at:
https://www.coreysdigs.com/solutions/form-for-employees-whose-employers-are-requiring-covid-19-injections/
It has numerous references for defending oneself and one’s family from the evil.