Posted on 09/08/2021 8:29:03 PM PDT by ransomnote
Trump said it yesterday in the interview with Jim Hoft, and he’s used the same analogy at least 3 times that I’ve heard or read. Maybe others remember the other times. The context is the stolen election.
Yesterday he also said the election may have to be de-certified.
where is steve mcqueen as josh randall?
I think the diamonds might be the stolen votes.
President Trump dropped some major bombs during his discussion this evening with the Gateway Pundit.
President Trump was asked about what happens if the states conducting audits decertify their elections.
“When you rob the store if it’s diamonds…and you get caught, you’re supposed to return them…
TRENDING: Full VIDEO: The Gateway Pundit Interviews President Donald Trump (Updated)
…and then you’re gonna have to say ‘well okay, we caught them cheating’. You’re gonna let somebody that cheated stay for 3 more years? I can’t imagine it.”
💔💔💔
https://twitter.com/TaskFor26668668/status/1436535214067666946
“When you rob the store of their diamonds.. (Store is being America) and (is their Diamonds.. their citizens or children).. Listen to President Trump tonight...”
The end product of human trafficking, when the victim is used up, no more sex, or ritual, or adrenochrome harvest, or organ ‘donation’ is the manufacture of diamonds from the ashes. These sickos think it gives soul-tie rights to that person. They keep them as prizes.
It’s an industry, dontchaknow...
https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffsb&q=make+diamonds+from+loved+ones+ashes&ia=web
From patriots.win:
Based on the following article: https://archive.
If Facebook is addressing privacy concerns up front, this means they are planning to violate your privacy.
Facebook insists the spectacles... were designed with privacy in mind
Translation: We intentionally designed these as sunglasses because they will presumably be worn outdoors, where Americans do not have a ‘reasonable expectation of privacy’. We designed these glasses to violate your privacy.
The glasses.... allow wearers to ... capture photos and short videos and share them across Facebook’s services using a companion app.
Translation: The glasses will continually monitor people and send video back to the mother-ship’s facial recognition system. Even if the wearer doesn’t know who you are, we do. Hey, you’re in public, you have no right to privacy.
We have a big responsibility to help people feel comfortable and provide peace of mind, and that goes not only for device owners but the people around them, too.
Translation: The people who wear these glasses don’t care about their own privacy, why would they care about yours? If you see somebody wearing theses glasses, beware, you’re privacy is going to be violated.
Zuckerberg touted hardware protections like a power switch to turn off the mic and camera... [He] insisted in the presentation video that when the glasses are turned off, “they are completely off.”
Translation: The glasses must be manually turned off and are designed to record when not being worn. They can be set on a table in a restaurant or office or in a shirt pocket or sun glass holder and still be recording. If the user doesn’t turn them off, don’t blame us if your privacy is violalted.
“We put this LED light on the front of the glasses so that people around you will know when you’re taking a photo or video,” Zuckerberg said.
Translation: We partnered with Ray-ban because these glasses look exactly like the millions of other Ray-ban’s that have been worn for decades. If you don’t notice the little red LED, it’s your problem that your privacy has been violated.
“Hopefully we don’t have folks using these for stalking,”
Translation: The glasses are going to be used to stalk anybody and everybody in public where sunglasses are normally worn.
“Unfortunately, those features weren’t included in this first iteration of these smart glasses”
Translation: We consulted with privacy experts who recommended an automatic disable function when the LED is covered and that the glasses be easily distinguishable from regular Ray-bans but they don’t fully understand our objective. We designed theses glasses to violate your privacy, why would we include features that make it more difficult?
Facebook, which has in the past faced criticism over its handling of user data, said it would not access the media used by its smart-glasses customers without their consent.
Translation: Like all of our other products, the user must consent to their privacy being violated when they sign up. The beauty of these glasses is we can easily violate the privacy of people nearby the user without getting their consent. Duh!
The company also said it would not use the content of the photos or videos captured using the glasses... for personalizing ads, and said the glasses would be an “ads-free experience.”
Translation: We already know everything there is to know about the person wearing these glasses. It would be foolish to discourage them from gathering more and more information about other people who may not want, or consent, to us knowing about their daily activities.
Facebook has also launched a privacy-focused micro-site where it offers guidelines for responsible use of the smart glasses.
Translation: We created a separate website to address any privacy concerns you may have. Notice there’s only one point under the section about privacy of others. The red LED is designed to protect you. If they don’t notice it, it’s not your fault their privacy was violated.
Remember Pedes, the Left ALWAYS tips you off to what they’re doing. They know most people don’t pay attention so they use this tactic to justify their evil ways.
Posted on 9/11/2021, 12:54:38 PM by Jan_Sobieski
“Mary Rudyk, MD tells Director of Marketing Carolyn Fisher...”
I wonder if she’s a mom doctor, or a gas doctor?
The Home of the Free Because of the Brave:
You can read the FDA statement. I make no claims one way or the other.
I saw the video.
Elena didn't line up so well. She ran around the courtyard, squawking like a chicken, ducking and diving, although her hands were tied behind her back.
They shot her repeatedly on the move, until she was no longer moving. Nicholai was still protesting the sentence, but a little more dignified, as they shot him too.
Then they arranged the carcasses for the official photographs.
The multitudes outside were cheering greatly.
Still, it was overly merciful and swift for such tyrants. There are currently millions of such tyrants who deserve the same.
Their Crimes Against Humanity justify the worst possible demise.
https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2021/09/the-week-in-pictures-long-strange-trip-edition.php
and
https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2021/09/the-week-in-pictures-interwar-years-edition.php
FReepmail me if you want on/off the ping list
Who are the other two?
Haha. I looked up Roberts. Similar, but not fake Prez, IMO.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.