Graphene Oxide Is the Main Ingredient in Covid Jabs Says Former Pfizer Employee

Based Underground ^ | 9/1/21 | JD Rucker

[bagster]

He was too materialistic for me.

A cat lady AND a hippie.

Great.

[LilFarmer]

Of the links I posted, these are peer reviewed studies.

**The FDA-approved drug ivermectin inhibits the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166354220302011

**Attenuation of clinical and immunological outcomes during SARS-CoV-2 infection by ivermectin
EMBO Mol Med (2021)13:e14122https://doi.org/10.15252/emmm.202114122

**Elucidation of the inhibitory activity of ivermectin with host nuclear importin α and several SARS-CoV-2 targets
https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2021.1911857

**Ivermectin for COVID-19: real-time meta analysis of 63 studies
https://ivmmeta.com
This link has a database of all ivermectin COVID-19 studies. 113 studies, 73 peer reviewed, 63 with results comparing treatment and control groups.

**The broad spectrum host-directed agent ivermectin as an antiviral for SARS-CoV-2 ?
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.10.042

[Jamestown1630]

I’m not sure you understand the term ‘materialistic’ in its proper sense.

But I’m going to sleep now, and you’re SOL.

[Jane Long]

Get help.

I know you’re living in fear, over your choice, but disparaging (and, lying about) Republicans, while applauding Dems, on a conservative forum, is not a “smart” way to lash out.

And, your cohorts would demand a link for that thrashing out post.

I don’t give a fig where you pulled that from.

Once, again....go away, gnat.

[bagster]

Every ten days, at least 8000 unvaccinated republicans are dying of covid..And that is five times the rate of democrats.

Every three minutes, a pretend conservative, defender of the state loses 188k brain cells just from thinking stupid thoughts. That number jumps by 19.74% if he types those stupid thoughts on the internet. If vaxxed, the loss is off the charts. Our flux capacitor could not handle the volume.

Science.

(and this has been peer reviewed)

[bagster]

I’m not sure you understand the term ‘materialistic’ in its proper sense.

Oh, I think I do, cat granny. Maybe you don't understand the term 'hippie'. Ever think of that?

Smarter than you, remember?

[Jane Long]

Don’t even bother giving that Dem cheerleader the time of day with your well researched sources. Again, it’s never enough.

Even after seeing thread after thread of proof, posted by MANY, here...it is still in (fear ?) denial

At least they admit they’re toeing the Democrat line.

See post 204.

I didn’t realize they’re asking political affiliation at hospitals and (of families) at funeral homes, now.

Wouldn’t surprise me, with these XiDen/BigPharma minions, though.

Have a good night.

[LilFarmer]

Thanks - good night!

[zzeeman]

I’m just here to collect the links and read the REPORTS!

🧐

[Jim Robinson]

Knock it off.

[grey_whiskers]

She is a girl, who is overly impressed with herself for having attained to the high and lofty stature of bench worker/lab tech, if I recall her discussion with gassy a few weeks ago correctly.

Oh -- but she brags that she was in a gifted and talented class, which proves she knows everything.

This is her attitude in a nutshell:

[grey_whiskers]

Now do Semmelweis.

[grey_whiskers]

You're projecting, Jamie.

Here's my counterargument in 2 annotated pictures and one sentence and one question.

US deaths from COVID by age, 2020-2021.

The overall death rate is about 0.3% or so.

That long line at the top, with the most people?

That's age 85 and over.

Here's the death rates relying on jabs, versus using Ivermectin, in Africa, where medical care/life support sucks, so your treatment better be good. (Johns F'ing Hopkins, too.):

Here's the one sentence.

Ivermectin was awarded the 2015 Nobel Prize in Medicine, and over 3 billion doses have been safely given to humans since its discovery in 1975.

Here's the question:

Tell me again why we need lockdowns and universal jabs including 12-year-olds, and why we need Emergency Use Authorizations for a novel technology that has never worked in humans, when there is NOT a crisis, and we have a cheap, safe, NOBEL PRIZE winning treatment instead?

[musicman]

BTTT!!!

[dadfly]

well. i would think that not including all the ingredients of a so called “approved vaccine” would amount to fraud. wouldn’t it? and if so, you’ve perhaps found a window (according to the FDA indemnity clause code—full disclosure, not a lawyer) that i’ve been reading for suing big pharma directly, not just indirectly for vaccine injuries though gov’t/big pharma money pools.

[grey_whiskers]

Any reply at all is a reward. I love operant conditioning.

I wanna see Sheldon Cooper start feeding you chocolates, Penny.

[upchuck]

Already been done by Dr Robert Young. See the comments to the article for the link.

[grey_whiskers]

The reason science involves published and peer reviewed studies is because they gain or lose credibility.

Credibility has no place in science.

Since you like to brag about your meagre intellect when discussing issues far beyond your capabilities, I present the counterargument from a scientist who

went to M.I.T.

got a PhD from M.I.T.

in a HARD STEM field

and FINISHED the PhD at age 21.

...who also got a Nobel Prize in Physics.

It's wrong.

The data is what matters, not the "credibility".

Credibility gives us Ignatz Semmelweis, who was an earlier MD who pushed for cleanliness during surgery, who was literally driven out of the medical field and driven insane, dying broke.

Because "credibility".

Credibility gave us the editorial in The Lancet, 'dBOOOOOONKing' the lab-"theory" of the Chy-na virus origin, literally solicited and orchestrated, by a guy instrumental in FUNDING the Wuhan labs where the gain-of-function work was done.

In fact the study published that showed ivermectin in a favorable light was discredited and removed.

Peer review matters.

You're behind the times, Einstain.

You literally have no idea what the living HELL you're talking about.

https://ivmmeta.com/

Ivermectin for COVID-19: real-time meta analysis of 63 studies Covid Analysis, Aug 26, 2021, Version 112 — updated Morgenstern (V1 Nov 26, 2020)

(See how it's been constantly updated? They removed the "deBOOOOOOONKers' favorite strawman study from the analysis over a month ago. Moron.)

Meta analysis using the most serious outcome reported shows 72% [55‑82%] and 86% [75‑92%] improvement for early treatment and prophylaxis, with similar results after exclusion based sensitivity analysis and restriction to peer-reviewed studies or Randomized Controlled Trials.

•Statistically significant improvements are seen for mortality, hospitalization, recovery, cases, and viral clearance. 27 studies show statistically significant improvements in isolation. The probability that an ineffective treatment generated results as positive as the 63 studies is estimated to be 1 in 1 trillion.

Or, here's another source, which ought to make your lips quiver and your eyelids flutter at the mere mention of the name.

JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY.

DIRECT COMPARISON OF DEATH RATES USING THE JABS VS. IVERMECTIN.

I'd say your credibility just took about a dozen torpedos beneath the waterline.

Want a chocolate? (Operant conditioning)

[grey_whiskers]

Ivermectin: a multifaceted drug of Nobel prize-honoured distinction with indicated efficacy against a new global scourge, COVID-19

ScienceDirect.com

[Leaning Right]

Robert Young is a con man, and a convicted criminal. All his “college degrees” are diploma-mill fakes.

https://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/local/ph-miracle-author-robert-o-young-sentenced/19346/

And that’s what makes this whole vaccine issue so difficult. You’ve got con men on the pro-vaxx side (example: Dr. Fauci) and you’ve got con men on the anti-vaxx side (example: Robert Young).