Posted on 08/06/2021 6:54:25 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
Here's some info on Gamma: It appears that the injected spread the virus to the others-injected and not injected.
However, some miners with natural immunity and no injection did not get the variant.
The studies that show natural immunity is better are more believable because they don't originate from the CDC, which has lied to us, denied access to medication, and knowingly selected a fake PCR 'test' to lock us down, hold the door open for election theft, destroy the economy, and mask us. They are guilty of mass murder and are actively engaging in coup.
The CDC's 'study' is based on fabricated data - who gets sick based on a fake PCR test that they still 'need' to use to create fake numbers through December 2021.
Among the 5 other studies, there's additional methods which do not rely on the PCR. Antibodies, bone marrow plasma, and people who are not property of China.
"Researchers in Kentucky teamed with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) officials to carry out the case-control evaluation of the link between vaccination and infection."
I looked up "Kentucky's Integrated Surveillance Information Systems/NEDSS". It's only named that way to conceal the fact that the CDC/FEDS have access to your medical records. Having them raises issues, you see.
Trying to search for 'Kentucky's system leads to the CDC's system which it invites states to fill with patient information. All 50 states have complied.
I believe this is the product of the fake HIPPA rules - people tried to explain when HIPPA was rolled out that it actually eliminated privacy and let many agencies share your medical information freely, similar to the Patriot Act, which weaponized the intel agencies, giving them complete access to information about you collected by any local, state, or federal agency.
"All your private medical information R belong to us!"
Oh, I'm sure they'll say it's just Covid information tracking, but it's not. Say, I wonder if this system allows information sharing to track disease so that the Federal government know's who has been 'naughty' and who has been 'nice'? (Vaccinated/Unvaccinated)
Wouldn't it be great if the Biden administration could send out vaccine strike teams to the homes of the unvaccinated first? Oh, give them clipboards and tell them to 'ask' if all are vaccinated, but door to door is a tiring job so prioritize conservative areas, Christians, people speaking up against the government. You know, just the usual. Take notes of the structure, any guard dogs or fences in order to make their planned mandatory vaccine and passport roll out more efficient.
https://www.cdc.gov/nndss/about/nedss.html
Integrated Surveillance Information Systems/NEDSS
Integrated surveillance information systems in public health departments are primary sources of data for the National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System (NNDSS). These systems are based on the National Electronic Disease Surveillance System (NEDSS) architectural standards. By encouraging the use of and helping to support standards-based public health surveillance systems, NEDSS helps public health agencies accept electronic data exchanges from healthcare systems and enables health departments to create and send standards-based case notifications to CDC for NNDSS. Currently, jurisdictions can send case notifications by using different standards; the CDC NNDSS Modernization Initiative is working to provide a single, new standard to transmit data to CDC.
NEDSS helps connect the healthcare system to public health departments and those health departments to CDC by
- providing leadership and resources to state and local health departments to adopt standards-based systems needed to support national disease surveillance strategy;
- defining the content (i.e., disease diagnosis, risk factor information, lab confirmation results, and patient demographics) of messages sent using the HL7 messaging standard;external icon
- implementing content standards that the healthcare industry currently uses (for example, LOINC as the standard for transmitting laboratory test names and SNOMED as the standard for transmitting test results) for increased interoperability between public health departments and the healthcare industry; and
- providing the NEDSS Base System (NBS), a CDC-developed information system, to help reporting jurisdictions manage reportable disease data and send notifiable diseases data to CDC. For more information about NBS, please access the NBS web site at https://www.cdc.gov/nbs/.
Today, all 50 states and Washington, D.C., use NEDSS-compatible integrated surveillance information systems to send case notifications to NNDSS. To be considered NEDSS compatible, states must have information systems meeting these requirements:
- disease data entry directly through an Internet browser-based system, thereby creating a database accessible by health investigators and public health professionals,
- electronic laboratory reporting that enables labs to report cases to health departments,
- integration of multiple health information databases into a single repository, and
- electronic messaging capabilities, enabling states to share information efficiently with CDC and other health agencies.
HEre's a quote from the above:
"They also utilized the state’s immunization registry to look for fully vaccinated persons."
They could, if they were honest and didn't lie about the results, compare mortality of those 'fully vaccinated' to those who have since died for any reason, and do the same for the unvaccinated....but they coudl't report he results then, could they?
If they wanted to, they could have added fields to the existing database to house vaccine adverse event information in order to actively and efficiently capture information critical to public health upon introducing an experimental mass vaccination. If they wanted to.
Well, that horse has left the barn, hasn't it?
Earlier today in another thread I posted this bit of analysis I did.
***
A little while ago I was looking at another horribly flawed CDC study after seeing this Daily Mail article
The article also said:
COVID-19 survivors who do not get vaccinated have higher odds of contracting the virus again than those who do get their shots, a new report finds.
Data analyzed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) found that those who were previously infected and didn't get vaccinated were 2.3 times more likely to be reinfected than survivors who were immunized.
The findings provide further evidence supporting vaccination for all Americans, even those who had mild or asymptomatic cases of Covid.
I noticed that the ratios in the subject group were almost identical to the ratios in the control group, as if they were all taken from the same group, as if the group being studied were just like the control group of first-time COVID sufferers. The CDC looked at that data and claim they found evidence that supports the narrative of the day, that the vaccines are much better than naturally acquired immunity, which is contrary to almost all the prior data on COVID immunity.
Problems:
COVID-19 reinfection: a rapid systematic review of case reports and case series
That paper looked at all reports from around the world for almost all of 2020. It found:
A total of 17 cases of genetically confirmed COVID-19 reinfection have been reported in the literature to date.
The CDC claims they looked at 246 reinfections in Kentucky in just two months. Maybe Kentucky is the hotbed of worldwide Covid reinfections (do we love our sisters too much?), or maybe the CDC is once again proving their incompetence.
Kentucky has run 7,317,475 COVID tests. A meta-analysis of data from New England found an overall false positive rate of about 1.19%, which would mean Kentucky should have 87,000 people who had falsely tested positive for COVID. Since we had more tests (7 million) than population (4.47 million), a 1.19% false positive rate would mean 1.95% of our population are people who had a false positive.
In May and June, the period the CDC studied, there 14,241 new COVID patients in Kentucky. Given the random nature of infection, of those 14,241 COVID patients, 277 should be patients who'd previously tested positive but who actually never had COVID.
The CDC study said there were 248 Kentuckians who'd become reinfected, pretty much in line with the expected number of COVID patients who were prior false positives.
The original CDC paper is here
Note that they didn't actually study any patients, they just matched up entries in the Kentucky databases on cases and vaccinations.
This study seems to show that previous infection, combined with vaccination, prevents a second infection, more than previous infection alone. This is not surprising, anyone with a previous infection has a (for example) 98% reduction in chance of a second infection, and vaccination produces a 95% reduction in subsequent infection, then having precious infection PLUS vaccination should produce a 99%+ reduction in chance of infection. The headline is just the usual misleading Covid clickbait nonsense.
SO, WHICH STUDY RESULTS TO BELIEVE?"
One flaw may be that unvaccinated may tend to be more careless in interaction, while a key aspect is that of being infected with variants and being merely infected versus recovering. The article states, "The odds of getting infected with the virus, which causes COVID-19, were 2.3 times higher among people who had been infected before when compared to those who were fully vaccinated, according to the new report." Acquired immunity may provide a more robust resistance to variants.
“Thanks for good news. I’ve had a left branch problem all my life. Two beats out of time with the other valve side only opening once. The pacemaker will match the needed rhythm. I have been extremely tired all the time, feeling like a thousand pounds is on me.”
A early 50 something daughter of very good friends, passed out while talking to friends on a Friday pm after school. She was/is a teacher.
Her teacher friends brought her to the local hospital with a good cardiac team after she came to.
The team stabilized the woman over the weekend and in the morning of Monday, they installed the pace maker.
They discharged her that afternoon, and she feels great and hasn’t had any episodes for close to 2 months. Once or twice a day, she feels the pacemaker doing its job. She is monitored 24/7 and her pacemaker does its job when needed.
You will be very happy with your results.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.