Does he have an error in which he specifies "non-institutionalized civilian population...SNIP...who are not in prison or otherwise in an institution" when in fact he meant the opposite?
"The red highlight is the running 12 month difference between the column the arrow points to. This is the non-institutionalized civilian population, defined as all persons 16 or older who are not in prison or otherwise in an institution (e.g. mental hospital.) It has historically run around 2 million a year for the last couple decades, with some notable divergences (there was a very large spike upward in the early 2000s, for example.)
Note that to increase or decrease this rate adults have to screw about 17 years earlier, since it takes 9 months for the bun in said oven to emerge and then 16 more years before said child is counted. The only other way is for a large number of people to enter or leave institutional life (e.g. being imprison) or...... for them to die."
When I saw the number 2 million introduced for 'non - institutional' population I assumed it must be population growth because the number is too small to be adult population. Okay, I'm guilty of laziness. So I read through and thought he was saying we should have had 2 million population growth but only had a million.
But then I got to the part where he said the only other way for people to enter/leave institutional life is to die and assumed he was touching on more than one point and didn't provide enough info in between for me to try to explain it if I post it.
But I'm now thinking he really did emphasize the wrong group by way of introducing his article. I Know he's good so that's not a slam, it's just the prominence of that intro that made me think I'll never understand stock market people.
SO correct my thinking if there's moar I'm missing.
If I'm correct I could just introduce the group in my own words and excerpt the rest of the article.
But then I am not sure that death is the only way that many people enter or leave institutional life.
Seeing other FIVE EYES partners further along the NWO path of slavery, and watching Biden struggling to keep up, I recall that
a) they've been releasing prisoners to fortify Deep State troops under the excuse of Covid and
b) they could antipate riots and resistance and may be emptying jails to make room for people like us? Biden needs more room in his gulags? Can't 'eliminate' first rounds of protesters because it will trigger those still not arrested? Is that too dark?
c) they would also have vaccine deathst that attributed to other causes like heart attack, stroke, diabetes etc.
But he's waving a flag we need to see. I guess I can just excerpt his comments about the population change and pose my own theories but I don't know how helpful that would be.
Speaking of dark thoughts:
Someone, I forget who, gave me a link to a rumble or Bannedvideo.com wherein a woman reads a written account of an australian detained for medical reasons (I forget why) and at some point he exited his room at night and witnessed other people held to the floor by goons being injected with something. I think that group was protesters. A nurse apparently saved the man's life by telling him to not resist and pretend he hadn't seen or understood that. The friend he called wanted to come rescue him and this guy warned him not to, and said that he had to play along to get released.
I didn't post it as a thread because, as dark as it is, it's going to be hard for others to believe written accounts, and opens the door to posting other people reading emails as if factual.
But the Communist takewover requires that kind of treatment of protesters until there is compliance so I suspect it is real. In the US we have to get louder and more numerous so they don't continue on the path Biden's handlers are struggling to follow.
Daily reversals, the CDC admits the vax doesn't stop infection or spread, don't change their attempts to still make it to wher eCanada and Australia are already heading. Media blackouts around the world on protests. Canadians and Aussies must be protesting too. We need to protest while we still can, and also point to Canada and Australia because they can't.
God has blessed America with a President who fights for us still. Canada and Australia don't have that, but they still have God. Please keep our brothers and sisters in Australia and Canada in your prayers, and ask God to give us strength to stand for freedom, human rights, Constitutional rights, and to call liars in the government and MSM by their true names.
I cannot see the chart well enough to know what he’s talking about—and there are no headings.
However, I believe he meant non-institutionalized civilian population. Because of the last sentence:
This trend started in January and, at this point, has destroyed fully half of the workforce expansion — one million working-age Americans — thus far.
*****************
So is he looking a birth records, population records, or employment records? Hard to make a judgement when the exact subject isn’t defined.
I suspect that there will be more posts on this later that will help to clear it up. So I’d wait till we know more about what he has. JMHO.
If the vax doesn’t stop infection or spread, what is it really designed to do? What is it really for? We know.
INTERESTING COMMENT BELOW THE KD ARTICLE:
Posted awhile back about how my 81 year old father has multiple cerebral blood cloths and brain bleeding about 4 weeks after the 2nd Moderna shot (he passed away 5 days later after multiple brain surgeries to try to stop the bleeding).
There were about 8 of he and his friend (all around his age) that went to the coffee shop every morning in their small town.
4 of them died within 5 weeks of getting their second jabs (and a 5th guy had a stoke and they found him laying out in his back yard sun burnt where he had been lying unconscious for about 4 hours - he survived, but can’t walk now).
Do 81 year olds die? All the time. Do 81 year olds die of clotts/strokes? Yep? Do they sometimes die in clusters? Yep. Did it still freak everyone out in their small town? Yep.
Talking to the funeral director (this was in early May), he said his last 5 weeks has been busier than he can ever remember - but it wasn’t due to COVID as they had very few cases in the county - and none among the elderly.
I reported my father’s death in VEARS, but I’m sure they made up some excuse why it couldn’t be attributable to the jab. Although he was 81, he was on NO medication (took a multi-vit, fish oil, and a baby aspirin each morning), still working - ran a radiator repair shop and used car lot, was in really good physical shape, and had great blood work at his last dr visit. I’m sure they just refiled my report as “old man died.”
I’m willing to bet there has been A LOT of that taking place lately. If you didn’t die within 72 hrs of the jab and are over X years in age, it gets ignored as a potential vax death - which might start to explain the anomaly KD has identified if that theory pans out.
POSTING ANOTHER COMMENT THAT GOES WITH THIS ARTICLE, SO WE CAN SEE IT ALL TOGETHER BY CLICKING REPLIES:
Kickthecan:
Thinking the people jabbed earlier were groups with more fragile health. That would explain the big drop at first and then a more gradual decline.
Screenshot from https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker....
KD replies:
Actually @Kickthecan if you look at the excess mortality the cohorts of 65+ and above all have below-trend.
Why?
We killed them already.
This likely excludes Covid as being the actual cause.
https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/empsit.pdf
Civilian noninstitutional population........................................... 260,373 261,210 261,338 261,469 131
So this is the total population over the age of 16 who are not in institutions, and theoretically able to work. I interpret that Karl has been tracking this for years, and noticed an anomaly.
At this point I believe more is needed to establish what caused it. In fact, Karl says as much:
“It may not be what it appears; it's too early to be sure. But if it is, the CDC and others are actively hiding something very profound, nasty, and worse than Covid-19’s toll last year.”
Keep an eye on it. I'll bet Karl will post some more on the subject later.
Obseedian posted:
It’s showing up in the Social Security data as well.
https://www.ssa.gov/policy/docs/quickfac....
Let’s look at total Social Security recipients:
March 2019: 68,310 (thousands)
June 2019: 68,557
Change: +247
March 2021: 69,781
June 2021: 69,853
Change: +72
Between the end of March and End of June 2021, about 50000 died officially from COVID. So let’s be generous and assume all of them were drawing social security, and add back to the 50k as if it never happened, that still leaves us at +132k. So we are short a gain of 120k. Compared to a “normal” period in 2019. Where did they go? Don’t they want their checks?
It’s actually worse, because as time goes on and as the population ages those differentials are expected to increase.
Zappafan:
Who was it who said, when you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth? Sherlock Holmes?
Clearly we’ve eliminated just about every possible explanation for the missing million. It’s not some baby bust back in 2004-2005, nor retirements (I fell into that trap earlier and now recognize the mistake.)
A boatload of ex-pats doesn’t make sense either. It is a pain in the ass to give up your citizenship, by design. If I just take my retirement in Costa Rica, collect SS and continue to file income taxes, I don’t think that takes me out of the “non institutionalized civilian population.”
No the only way out seems to be dead, loony bin, or jail.
I think we can eliminate jail for sure - last year they released inmates for many non-violent crimes “because COVID.” Many courts are backlogged for months on trials and sentencing.
I have seen the excess deaths continue into June 2021 in the CDC’s own page. My vote is “dead, Jim.”
FlappingEagle, made a good Point:
Red jack, I believe you can attribute a good portion of your friends extra business to the leading edge of the baby boomers hitting 75 this year. A local funeral home that I know of has been so busy the last five years that they were happy when a new competitor came into the market.