To: Mrs. Don-o; tellw; Huskrrrr; Jane Long; Freedom'sWorthIt; Freedom56v2; BDParrish; Phx_RC; cba123; ..
To: SeekAndFind
But we already have something to reduce symptoms….a highly dangerous, completely experimental, that turns your body into a spike protein factory. Why would we need a simple, safe, effective, cheap alternative?
Do I really need the sarc tag? I didn’t think so.
3 posted on
08/02/2021 9:15:14 PM PDT by
walkingdead
(We are sacrificing American youth's future on the altar of our own fear. And it is a travesty.)
To: SeekAndFind
4 posted on
08/02/2021 9:16:19 PM PDT by
MAGAthon
To: SeekAndFind
“conducted a randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial from May 15, 2020, through the end of January 2021 to evaluate the effectiveness of ivermectin in reducing viral shedding among nonhospitalized patients with mild to moderate COVID-19.“
Heck that trial was longer and better trial than the experimental “vaccines” went through.
5 posted on
08/02/2021 9:17:34 PM PDT by
walkingdead
(We are sacrificing American youth's future on the altar of our own fear. And it is a travesty.)
To: SeekAndFind
All Quiet On The Indonesia Front
6 posted on
08/02/2021 9:20:18 PM PDT by
kiryandil
(China Joe and Paycheck Hunter - the Chink in America's defenses)
To: SeekAndFind
Nooooo…How dare you suggest a cheap, well established and researched drug that’s been around for years can be effective at treating more than one thing. Why, we have a safe, “effective” vaccine developed by Pfizer that stands to make them billions, I mean, stop Covid.
7 posted on
08/02/2021 9:21:59 PM PDT by
matt04
( )
To: SeekAndFind
No money to be made in this treatment.
No way to increase the size and scope of government either.
The government will pressure all media to censure discussion of this trial
8 posted on
08/02/2021 9:23:36 PM PDT by
NoLibZone
(If the CDC concern for deaths were real they would have a team on ground in Sweden :0 deaths 7 days)
To: SeekAndFind
No money to be made in this treatment.
No way to increase the size and scope of government either.
The government will pressure all media to censure discussion of this trial
9 posted on
08/02/2021 9:23:43 PM PDT by
NoLibZone
(If the CDC concern for deaths were real they would have a team on ground in Sweden :0 deaths 7 days)
To: SeekAndFind
No money to be made in this treatment.
No way to increase the size and scope of government either.
The government will pressure all media to censure discussion of this trial
10 posted on
08/02/2021 9:23:43 PM PDT by
NoLibZone
(If the CDC concern for deaths were real they would have a team on ground in Sweden :0 deaths 7 days)
To: SeekAndFind
The Giant Lie is being exposed. Holding back simple treatments has cost the world millions of lives.
17 posted on
08/02/2021 9:37:42 PM PDT by
bray
(Hating Whites is racist)
To: SeekAndFind
The Giant Lie is being exposed. Holding back simple treatments has cost the world millions of lives.
18 posted on
08/02/2021 9:37:47 PM PDT by
bray
(Hating Whites is racist)
To: SeekAndFind
I also read that Merck now has a drug/therapeutic that they have been working on to market for treating the RONA. New drug - better profit opportunity.
No profit motive to do anything with the existing drug.
30 posted on
08/02/2021 9:57:59 PM PDT by
greeneyes
( Moderation In Pursuit of Justice is NO Virtue--LET FREEDOM RING)
To: SeekAndFind
BUT IVERMECTIN is not without controversy, and hence, despite the high levels of coronavirus worldwide, neither the FDA nor the World Health Organization have been willing to approve it for use in the fight against the virus.
This makes no sense, I'm not an epidemiologist, but I can read. They aren't willing to "approve" a drug that is [i]already[/i] approved? That is, what the article fails to mention, or is misleading - is they won't authorize it for "off label" use, for emergency use. You know, like they did for the mRNA, which hasn't been Approved for anything, but everybody is saying they have. Anyhoo, If someone is literally dying from Covid-19, it seems reasonable to try a medication that seems promising.
“Ivermectin is a chemical therapeutic agent, and it has significant risks associated with it,” he said in a previous interview. “We should be very cautious about using this type of medication to treat a viral disease that the vast majority of the public is going to recover from even without this treatment.”
If the vast majority of the public is going to recover without any treatment, why is everyone running around demanding mandatory experimsntal vaccines and destroying economies and generally being assholes? Glad we got this cleared up.
All CLEAR EVERYBODY!! GET BACK TO WORK!!
To: SeekAndFind
cant get a vaccine EUA if there are approved therapies
so they poo poo any possible therapies
big pharma wants big money
37 posted on
08/03/2021 2:13:52 AM PDT by
joshua c
(Dump the LEFT. Cable tv, Big tech, national name brands)
To: SeekAndFind
so where are all the fake doctor trolls on FR trying to trash studies like this and promote killer, experimental vaccines?
haven’t seen much from them lately ...
38 posted on
08/03/2021 3:48:06 AM PDT by
catnipman
(Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
To: SeekAndFind
Years ago , the anti-Parkinson drug amantadine (Symmetrel) was noted to reduce flu symptoms. A minor modification of the structure led to the patent for Flumadine ( rimantidine).
“Rimantadine Hydrochloride is the hydrochloride salt form of rimantadine, a cyclic amine and alpha-methyl derivative of amantadine with antiviral activity. Although the exact mechanism of action of rimantadine is not understood, this agent appears to exert its antiviral effect against influenza A virus by interfering with the function of the transmembrane domain of the viral M2 protein, thereby preventing the uncoating of the virus and subsequent release of infectious viral nucleic acids into the cytoplasm of infected cells.)https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Rimantadine-hydrochloride
Not pointing this out to advocate for Flumadine in treatment of COVID, but to show another example of a drug origianally purposed for a disease far afield from a viral infection that is clinincally useful, and probably would have helped hundreds of thousands last year whose influenza was misdiagnosed as COVID by the defective CDC PCR test that is now being withdrawn.
39 posted on
08/03/2021 3:55:34 AM PDT by
sopo
To: SeekAndFind
Prof. Ya’acov Nahmias, a Hebrew University of Jerusalem researcher, has questioned the safety of the drug.
“Ivermectin is a chemical therapeutic agent, and it has significant risks associated with it,” he said in a previous interview. “We should be very cautious about using this type of medication to treat a viral disease that the vast majority of the public is going to recover from even without this treatment.”
Hm. This guy thinks we should be extremely cautious using a drug that's been around for a long time and has well-known (mild) risks. Does he also think everyone needs to get the ChinaVirus shot? Or is he at least consistent with his message that the "vast majority recover from without this treatment"?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson