Think about this for a minute and you realize it makes no sense.
“Although the superbubble is shaped by destructive forces, new stars are forming around the edges where the gas is being compressed. Like recycling on a cosmic scale, this next generation of stars will breathe fresh life into star cluster NGC 1929.”
Applied umiverse-wide (literally, in this case), doesn’t the above statement advance a concept of creation and recreation on a scale that directly contradicts the “heat death of the Universe” concept currently popular among astronomers and physicists?
The truth of the matter (play on words) is this:
Only Life begets life.
All of the elements and energy in the universe ( which was created by a Life) is just dust. Science knows it is. Its testable and proven. Real science.
Life begets life.
So if it is true that all matter aside from hydrogen and maybe helium and some elements up to iron come from supernovas, how many supernovas would it take to create the quantities of matter we see surrounding every single star? Not to mention the multitudes of rogue planets wandering around. And all this matter being madly dispersed by supernovas at very high velocities. It must be trillions of supernovas. And all in only 14 billion years? Lets’ say tons of gold are created. This gold disperses at extremely high temperatures in all directions. How does it later coalesce together into lumps. And how do other elements recombine? Wouldn’t it all just be in a generally dispersed cloud? Why would it ever collapse together again? Certainly gases don’t collapse together. It’s a convenient explanation for star formation. But gases don’t behave like that. Hydrogen in a vacuum just disperses.
Questions questions.
Fascinating stuff...but I still hate it when a hippie says “We’re made of stars”, or some such thing.
I hate to tell Clifford there are no trilobites.
How come no news about that new Russian thing pushing the ISS out of orbit or something