Posted on 07/23/2021 3:37:34 PM PDT by ransomnote
[H/T Cathi]
ransomnote: Dr. McCulloughs professional background is in Post #1.
ransomnote: Excellent 25 minute video. Notes on the first 7 minutes of the video here:
Stew Peters: Dr. McCullough has published a treatment protoccol for early outpatient treatment of Covid in the American Journal of Medicine, and subsequent updates to the protocol in reviews. He has 46 peer reviewed articles on the infection, has commented on the Covid crisis on The Hill, Laura Ingram and Fox News Channel.
Nov 19, 2020, Dr. McCullough in the US Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs and throughout 2021 in the Texas Senate Committee on Health and Human Services, Colorado General Assembly, and New Hampshire Senate concerning many aspects of the Covid Pandemic Response.
Dr. McCullough has had one full year of dedicated academic and clinical effort in combatting the Sars COV2 virus and in doing so has reviewed thousands of reports. He's participated in scientific congresses, group discussions, press releases, and has been considered among the worlds top experts on Covid-19.
He was originally a proponent of the vaccine. Then he witnessed the adverse reactions and has since come out adamantly against the Covid vaccines.
Dr. McCullough: The information about the vaccine trials released by the pharmaceutical companies was initially quite promising. The 'attack rate' (rate at which people were succeptible to Covid infection) in the trials was less than 1% which was very low compared with Covid infection rates published for the general public. This was unusual given the rates of Covid last fall (same time as trials), so he believes trial participants were particularly healthy.
The adverse reactions reported for the trials occurred in the arm, but there were any major systemic adverse reactions. Through December, January February, 70% of his patients in Baylor Hospital, Dallas received the Covid-19 vaccine. He didn't order the vaccines, doctors don't prescribe them, patients volunteered for them. It's completely voluntary.
Looking back now, on Janary 22, 186 deaths had already occurred following Covid-19 vaccinations. The threshhold of concern is about 150 or so.
In general we get about 150 for all the vaccines combined; 500 million shots per year across 70 vaccines. So, for a single vaccine (Covid), for only 27 million having gotten the vaccine by that time, to have 150 deaths - that should have been the alarm signal.
ransomnote: Jan 22, the rate of deaths reported following Covid-19 vaccinations was 20 times greater than the average rate for vaccines reported annually. Since they did not stop then, and the death rate grows beyond belief, it's obvious no level of deaths will stop this 'vaccine' program. They know it's killing people, and as it only gets worse, they only push harder to force us to take it.
Dr. McCullough: I think if we had a Data Safety Monitoring board, I think they would have shut it down in February of 2021.
Stew Peters: Notes 25 deaths shut down the Swine Flu vaccine. Some of the most deadly days in the United States (9/11) are small compared with the harm caused by the Covid vaccines (e.g., 9/11). Asks, How did you come to the conclusion that these deaths or adverse conditions were actually related to the vaccine?
Dr. McCullough: "Initially we didn't know as these deaths continue to mount. On two occaissions in March and June, the CDC put on their website that they had looked at the deaths and none of them were related to the vaccine. And so doctors in my circles were questioning this because patients were immediately dying after the vaccine, in the vaccine centers, or then shortly thereafter we would be called about some type of fatal event that's happened whether it's at home, or patients come to the hospital with some type of fatal event."
ransomnote: I believe this is the most successful psychological attack on the public's behavior - the public seems to accept that we cannot observe people dropping dead before leaving the vaccine center as relevent information.
Direct observation and natural self preservation instincts are treated as vindictive rumors and shameful fears.
I've seen videos of dogs that will drop food or treats if a stuffed animal approaches their food dish, pretends to eat, and then drops over 'dead'. The dogs spit their food out and walk away. Not us. If the CDC says 'eat it, it's good for you' and the MSM ridicules those who don't, compliance and a 'new reality' are born.
We're not stupid. We're up against CIA brainwashing/indoctrination techniques perfected over decades for the purpose of controlling the public.
However, we have grown soft and fearful as a result. We have to return to being the strong Americans we once were in order to survive this.
What does it matter if murderous traitors ridicule us? The approval of those who work to enslave and kill us can only be won by complying and dying.
"And so two important analyses came forward. One by McLaughlin from London and one by Rose, from Israel using the VAERS data."
They basically concluded this: 50% of fatalities following vaccination occur within 48 hours of injection. 80% occur within one week. 86% of the deaths have no other explanation (other than Covid 'vaccine'). They are well enough to walk into an ambulatory center to have a vaccine, and then within 2 days they've died.
"So it's my judgement, and I've done a lot of work on Data Safety Monitoring boards and Clinical Review boards, it's my judgement at this point in time, that in fact, the vaccine is the cause of the death in the majority of cases."
ransomnote: This is the MSM's biggest wartime accomplishment. Dr. Wuhan Fauci is still portrayed as the one in charge of protecting us against the biowarfare agents he helped produce and implement. He and the CDC worked to deny medication and treatment to those who are sick, and they are in charge of the US response to Covid.
Dr. McCullough and others have more experience and success treating and saving Covid patients, but the MSM and the Biden Administration officials have convinced the public that Anthony Fauci is our physician. Even though Fauci claims there are no safe, effective treatments for Covid, we're conspiracy theorists if we take medical advice from physicians specializing in the successful treatment of Covid.
Bill Gates is wrapped around the NIH, WHO and the CDC. He's been a business parter employing Anthony Fauci for years. Gates is the largest donor to these agencies and and through them directs public health in most of the world, including the US. By coincidence, Gates primary goal in life is depopulation. Who takes medical advice from a eugenecist?
The MSM is succeeding in elevating the malevolence of Bill Gates and Anthony Fauci over actual medical expertise. The public is taking medical advice from Mengele. It's killing us.
Stew Peters: What about long term impacts, deaths expected in the future?
Dr. McCullough: Well there are Tenets of Causality. It's called the Hill's Tenets of Causality, and that means, 'how do we asses if anything is really related to, say, the administration of a vaccine?'.
1. The first would be the temporal relationships, so I told you, in time, it's really closely related to the injection.
2. The biologic plausability: We know the vaccines cause the production of the dangerous spike protein which itself can be damaging to organs and be fatal, so we know the mechanism of action if we have an exaggerated response or uptake of the viral genetic products into the human body, that in fact the spike protein can be lethal. So, the biologic plausibility is there.
ransomnote: Ending my notes at the 7 minute mark. The whole video is excellent.
~~~~~~~~~
Our enemies have control of communications. It's how they indoctrinate and deploy a continuous stream of psychological techniques that are working. MSM and Social Media are the weapons depots of our enemies.
Even the constantly changing opinions of Fauci and the CDC are a known, documented CIA technique (it's not just that they are incompetent). By constantly shifting warnings, advice, encouagement, warnings, threats etc., they actually make the public MORE dependent on them. It's weird but it works. On an unsteady information landscape, the public begins to cling to the next dispatch with increasing tenacity in order to steady themselves.
We need to resist and they will falsely portray resistance as violence.
Perhaps boycotting communications would work. So many are currently addicted, literally, by design, to the poisonous messaging being used to defeat us psychologically, spiritually, physically.
CNN ratings are tanking but our enemies continue to fund them - there's no way they are self supporting at this point. The money losing proposition shows the importance of false, continuous indoctrination. Our enemies will spend every dime (much of it ours) on controlling and delivering continuous psyops to the public. It's their primary means of control and it will only get worse.
They are pretending to be uncertain about implementing vaccine passports. China has decided we will have them so it doesn't matter how Newsom, Biden, Fauci et. al. pretend to dither. All those sold out to China for big money. China owns them. China will accept nothing less than vaccine passports like theo nes they currently use to absolutely enslave their own people. The more time passes, the less resistance will remain and that's they only reason they are pretending to back down. Indoctrinate, equivocate, retreat, return - it's an act and resistance is diminishing.
Our strongest resistance will be that which we implement soonest. WE have more strength now, physically, spiritually, and psychologically, and they are chipping away at us to weaken us into compliance and defeat.
Boycotts, attending church, socializing with family, breaking isolation and TURNING THE MEDIA OFF. They need to know we stopped listening to the indoctrination. THey need to know we choose our own 'experts', and we're getting together locally and talking with one another. Together we are strong - that's why they are fanning social unrest (race, religion, Dem/Republican etc.).
Product boycotts for advertisers? Any visible signs we are unplugged from the MATRIXX could help.
Ghandi may have ideas for us in peaceful, lawful, protests.
Dr. Peter McCullough - URGENT WARNING About Poisonous Jabs - "An Agonizing Situation" (rumble.com)
They basically concluded this: 50% of fatalities following vaccination occur within 48 hours of injection. 80% occur within one week
1. The first would be the temporal relationships, so I told you, in time, it's really closely related to the injection.
semimojo wrote:
If the doctor understands VAERS I'm a little surprised he doesn't see the fallacy in this temporal relationship line of thought.
ransomnote: He's not quoting fallacy, he's quoting traditional tenets used to determine causality. It's so basic, so obvious. You know, one dog sees another eat from a dish and keel over and no longer wants to eat from the same dish.
semimojo wrote: Since VAERS is all based on self-reporting and not on ongoing surveillance it's a given you'll see more events reported close to the vaccination date.
ransomnote: But it's not a given that this will occur to a bizarre degree for the first time and only for Covid 'vaccines'. 500 million vaccines total injected per year averaging around 150 - 200 deaths. Covid 'vaccines' come along and we had 20 times that number for the first 26 million 'doses'. The numbers continue to climb beyond all imaginings and we're only at 7 months now.
If VAERS Data is, as you say, entirely based on 'self reporting', can we assume people paralyzed, dead or stroked/incapacitated reported soon after the event rather than later? Just curious.
semimojo wrote: It's simple human nature. If some medical issue arises you'll be much more likely to connect it with a shot you got yesterday than a shot you got 10 days ago.
ransomnote wrote: Read post #1 wherein his qualifications pound your silly ponderings into the dust with credentials, experience and success.
You are asserting it's self reporting - in many cases it's medical facilities, but often doctors don't have time to report it so it goes entirely unreported. Check the dates on the reports.
Your assertions are baseless. There's no way to explain away the fact that all other vaccines do not have this catastrophic die off either in 2 days after injection or in sheer numbers (thousands) of deaths. Medical facilities often report these deaths when they get around to it, it's not people breathelessly retelling the tale of their ER visit. That's what V-Safe is for. The CDC created a phone app called V-safe to capture and keep confidential as many reports of harm as possible directly from those who experience it in order to shield it from public view and deny harm.
semimojo: The only way this analysis has validity is if you actively monitor people getting the vaccine and consistently document issues, and then compare those numbers against a control group that didn't get the vaccine.
ransomnote: No. That's patently false. You're describing trial data. It's been done and falsified.
Now we're in administration of toxic 'vaccines'. There's normally a data review board monitoring administration, but the CDC did away with such traditions and announces secret meetings after the fact, with annonymous doctors, all of whom insist that not one of thousands of Covid vaccine deaths are at all related. None can be quoted or cited - for some reason we're not to know who has rendered these judgements.
Dr. McCullough is vastly more qualified than you are, and more qualified than Dr. Fauci, so I find it unintentionally humorous that you start with 'if the doctor understands VAERS' and then your ridiculous assertions that he did it all wrong, it's just the excitement of getting to report vaccine harm etc. Yours is complete distortion and fabrication. It's what you do.
I can't help but note you didn't say a word to address my criticism.
People, including doctors, are much more likely to connect a particular medical event to a shot the closer in time it occurred to that shot.
Is that observation in any way controversial?
I am getting tired of bad bad people who, apparently, force you to read the articles.
People, including doctors, are much more likely to connect a particular medical event to a shot the closer in time it occurred to that shot.
Is that observation in any way controversial?
~~~~~~~~~~~~
You’re indifferent to data collect tenets which hold proximity to event is relevant. WHen people collapse of anaphylaxis, the primary question is ‘what just happened to trigger this?’ The same principle is time tested and valued by physicians. You’d like to rewrite analysis used by researchers but fail.
I addressed your thesis by pointing out that had proximity to reporting been irrelevant to analysis but isntead an artifact of ‘human nature’ than it would hold true for the other 30 years of data collected in VAERS. Since Covid vaccines are the only ones displaying freakish patterns of excesses not matched by appox. 70 other vaccines in VAERS, your thesis fails for lack of evidence.
I can’t help but note that I said words about your criticism and you ignored them and continue to press your assertion that Dr. McCulloughs training and experience render him less capable of evaluating medical data than you are. Note that he was citing research by two others as part of his own opinion. Evidenced based research versus your assertions of superior reasoning? Yours is not the winning opinion.
Not self reported "data collection tenets".
...you...continue to press your assertion that Dr. McCulloughs training and experience render him less capable of evaluating medical data than you are.
Is it possible for you to lie more blatantly?
Is it possible for you to lie more blatantly?
~~~~~~~~~~
You get petulant when I expose your reasoning but there’s no other way to answer your questions. Dr. McCullough expresses the merits of the analyses of his work and others - you come along and say their analyses is by definition flawed and unreasonable. Oh well, I’m not responsible for your emotional reactions.
No surprise.
You don’t take responsibility for anything. Especially your misrepresentations to other FReepers.
Oh well, I’m not responsible for your emotional reactions.
No surprise.
You don’t take responsibility for anything. Especially your misrepresentations to other FReepers.
****************************************************************************************
Bull Crap. Ransomnote NEVER misrepresents anything.
ransomenote misrepresented my comment not 30 minutes ago.
“...you...continue to press your assertion that Dr. McCulloughs training and experience render him less capable of evaluating medical data than you are.”
I never asserted any such thing and neither you nor ransomnote can show where I did.
Want to reconsider your statement?
Ransomnote NEVER misrepresents anything.
ransomenote misrepresented my comment not 30 minutes ago.
“...you...continue to press your assertion that Dr. McCulloughs training and experience render him less capable of evaluating medical data than you are.”
I never asserted any such thing and neither you nor ransomnote can show where I did.
Want to reconsider your statement?
**********************************************************************************
Nope. Taking all the garbage you posted under consideration, I’d say that is an understatement of your self - inflated ego and your denigration of the Dr.
She made a logical conclusion based on the crap you posted.
The CDC is ...finally removing Emergency Use Authorization from PCR as a “diagnostic” for COVID.
a) they can’t defend the lie any longer?
b) they no longer need the hysteria and they’re preparing something else?
The CDC is ...finally removing Emergency Use Authorization from PCR as a “diagnostic” for COVID.
a) they can’t defend the lie any longer?
b) they no longer need the hysteria and they’re preparing something else?
**********************************************************************************
I pick both. They are not really mutually exclusive. Ha.
Translation: "I'm getting tired of hearing the truth".
Which is exactly why many people remain ignorant, indoctrinated rabbits.
Translation (from rabbit to human):
VAERS means absolutely nothing. Look away, citizen, look away. No conclusions can be reached or even estimated by VAERS data. It is a waste of time and money to even have a VAERS system.
Just listen to MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!
Signed,
A rabbit.
Haha. You want mommy to take responsibility for your emotional outbursts.
What a child.
Semiliterate:
ransomenote misrepresented my comment not 30 minutes ago.
Semicoherent quoting Ransomnote:
“...you...continue to press your assertion that Dr. McCulloughs training and experience render him less capable of evaluating medical data than you are.”
Semiretarded:
I never asserted any such thing and neither you nor ransomnote can show where I did. Want to reconsider your statement?
Okay, let'g break down just ONE of your comments.
If the doctor understands VAERS I'm a little surprised he doesn't see the fallacy in this temporal relationship line of thought.
According to this statement of yours, 'the doctor' doesn't understand VAERS (like you do) and he spouts fallacies through flawed analysis. But here you come along to set him straight.
If you can't even understand the things you yourself say, how you gonna analyze VAERS data. Or anything, for that matter.
#TheRabbitShuffle
👍🙋♀️Ha.
I don’t know how we can prevent another election theft. What do you suggest?
What’s the purpose of the Facebook source? Why do we want the website owners to think people are coming there from Facebook?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.