Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: grey_whiskers

What does this mean for “Stealth Bomber” —> B2 —> BB —> Bill Barr?


452 posted on 06/27/2021 9:23:00 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 451 | View Replies ]


To: grey_whiskers

I think it means that Bill Barr “bombed” out.


455 posted on 06/27/2021 9:33:51 PM PDT by greeneyes ( Moderation In Pursuit of Justice is NO Virtue--LET FREEDOM RING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 452 | View Replies ]

To: grey_whiskers

Stealth DS not Stealth Patriot. Mirror.


516 posted on 06/28/2021 2:55:23 AM PDT by Ymani Cricket ( "Pressure Makes Diamonds" ~General Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 452 | View Replies ]

To: grey_whiskers

What does this mean for “Stealth Bomber” —> B2 —> BB —> Bill Barr?
~~~~~~~~~~~~

The only remaining question mark I have is that Barr is to be impartial and the public has to know that. He couldn’t investigate with the FBI or DOJ because it was too corrupt, anything they touched would turn to lead. So the fact that Barr said he hadn’t seen any evidence seemed like “I’m keeping FBI and other sleeper operative hands off the evidence for you.”

So he couldn’t have any evidence and wouldn’t say that he did because he’s impartial (Police). He still hasn’t seen any evidence which gives me pause - why hasn’t he seen it? He can’t be part of the crowd looking because he would be accused of tainting/fixing evidence, so he’s still on the outside saying I don’t see it.

But his comments, if he made them, would seem to undermine. He never called for the Supreme Court to play it’s role. I didn’t see him make neutral statements explaining Pence could have rejected slate because that’s how the Constitution works. While he can’t play a role, he seems to be standing back too far, even from being neutral, because a neutral party could still point to cases with evidence being dismissed by courts all over the nation.

What’s odd is I used to be attacked, anyone would be, if I posted Barr posts - just furious ridicule with his main ‘character flaw’ being bagpipe playing. I thought they had to denigrate him because he has seen the Mueller Report and he has forced out Mueller and RR based on what he’s seen.

And then as Barr exited it fell relatively quiet, and the NYT actually said something positive about him! WUT!?

So either the MSM/black hats were relieved he was going, and were patting him on the head to encourage ‘good behavior ‘ (get outta here) or he caved in some way.

Now ‘know-it-alls’ on FR are back now saying they always knew he was bad (even when he was serving POTUS well, railing against China and change to weaken election laws?) and this latest news article supposedly quotes him from ‘Spring’ in the same article they mischaracterize the POTUS’s comments.

Barr could correct this, and say something now (e.g., “If what POTUS is saying is true, then we must correct the record to protect the Constitution and Freedom around the world”. But....silence.


610 posted on 06/28/2021 10:22:21 AM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 452 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson