CDC plans "emergency meeting" on rare heart inflammation following COVID-19 vaccines

CBS news ^

[MNDude]

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention announced Thursday that it will convene an "emergency meeting" of its advisers on June 18th to discuss rare but higher-than-expected reports of heart inflammation following doses of the mRNA-based Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines.

[Sacajaweau]

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/07/27/dr-anthony-fauci-isnt-particularly-concerned-about-safety-of-moderna-coronavirus-vaccine.html

[MNDude]

We keep saying “what else are they not telling us?”

I have a feeling we may soon find out another.

[mewzilla]

They’re gonna wait 8 days to hold it.

While vaccinations continue.

That’s some sense of urgency they got there, eh?

[mewzilla]

Meanwhile, mass vaccination for a bug with a fatality rate that’s around 99% for most folks may have killed more Americans than al Qaeda managed to do on 9/11.

WTG, Deep State!

[servantboy777]

I read/hear no one talking about the gene therapy mRNA shots utilizing in the development and or production HEK-239 (human embryonic kidney) tissue from aborted fetuses.

This is unethical and creates a huge market for aborted fetal tissue.

I thought I read at one time donated umbilical cord tissue/cells could be used instead. So why aborted fetal tissue?

[mewzilla]

Survival rate of over 99% for most folks...

WTH are we pushing mass vaccination?!

[Bookshelf]

They are meeting because the incidents are not as ‘rare’ as this foolish article supposes.

[hoagy62]

Why? Their master (Satan) HAS to have those sacrifices to Molech.

[servantboy777]

>>Why? Their master (Satan) HAS to have those sacrifices to Molech.<<

I’d like to say you’re a lunatic for such a comment...but...but...but, I believe you’re on target.

[ReformedBeckite]

They are meeting because the incidents are not as ‘rare’ as this foolish article supposes.

Yeah but the foolish ignorant masses don't know it is rare, and they will use this situation to ask for a trillion dollars more to study the situation and/or more likely the dirty swamp dweller communists will attempt another lock down as they declare the new vaccine bad and will tell us they need to make a new and better vaccine to deal with these very rare incidents which they will not tell you are rare incidents.

[week 71]

Sighing. Let’s hope it remains rare. Too many people (and many young with no danger) have taken a non-properly vetted vaccine.

[JonPreston]

While vaccinations continue.

Easy does it. Darwinian theory at work.

[palmer]

Survival rate of over 99% for most folks...

Actually all folks. Right now COVID mortality is 1% total. Most people won't get and spread COVID and they should take that into account too. But for the others the vaccine is worth looking at, objectively.

[redgolum]

Crap.

[cp124]

Ouchy said not to wear a mask.

[sageburn]

Its so rare they’e going to have an emergency meeting about it. Oh yeah, tell me again the “vaccines are the best thing since sliced bread..

[El Cid]

But for the others the vaccine is worth looking at, objectively.

You are absolutely correct - but looking at data "objectively" nowadays is darn near impossible.
I've hated the phrase that has been used nearly ad nauseam for the past year and a half:
'we are following the science', or, 'we are doing science'.
No we're not - we should be using the 'scientific method' and following, or reacting to, the data - not the "Science_TM".
But there is the rub -- I do not believe the gate-keepers of the data. The CDC has shown themselves to be such shameless liars regarding the data (e.g., the real death rates due to CoVid, and the real number of CoVid cases) that I would not trust anything coming out of their office. And I certainly won't believe anything told by the MSM (or other Government mouthpiece).

So I agree with you - it is right to look at the data objectively - but since it is impossible in today's environment to believe the keepers of the data - I have to stick with anecdotal comments.
So here were are ... I won't be taking this experimental concoction, and I'm certainly praying that the concerns about it are overblown, and that the harm is 'minimal' (although anyone harmed is one too many - even if a lot of people believe it is worth the collateral damage).

[kiryandil]

“Phony Ouchy”

[palmer]

You were doing great until this: "although anyone harmed is one too many". That's liberalism. Exactly the same as "we need to ban guns if it saves one child". Part of being objective is avoiding emotional arguments like one death is too many.

In fact one death or 100 deaths or maybe more is ok if it saves 100,000 lives in the next wave by drastically shrinking that wave. Here's objective data: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/israel/ Israel has reopened for the most part. They have a combination of natural immunity from maybe 25% infection (4 times the detected cases) plus a high vaccination rate.