Posted on 06/04/2021 11:30:28 AM PDT by Jan_Sobieski
Luc Montagnier has confirmed that there is no chance of survival for people who have received any form of the vaccine. In the shocking interview, the world’s leading virologist stated bluntly:
“There is no hope and no possible treatment for those who have already been vaccinated. We must be prepared to cremate the bodies.”
The scientific genius backed up the claims of other eminent virologists after studying the ingredients of the vaccine.
“They will all die from antibody-dependent enhancement. That is all that can be said.” Video link here or below. 16.0k
I looked into this video first off to even see who he was…that test passed. He’s not really anyone special. Just discovered the human immunodeficiency virus also known as HIV.
Montagnier argued that the Coronavirus disease 2019 266 was man-made in a laboratory and that it might have been the result of an attempt to create a vaccine for HIV/AIDS 70. His allegation came after the United States had launched a probe into whether the virus came from a laboratory. According to Montagnier, the “presence of elements of HIV and germ of malaria in the genome of coronavirus is highly suspect and the characteristics of the virus could not have arisen naturally.”[45 801
I looked to see if he really said this…that test passed.
I then looked to see if it was just taken out of context…it wasn’t.
I thought I’d see the stupid things the so called “fact checkers” had to offer up. Here is their razor sharp insight.
(Excerpt) Read more at disclose.tv ...
I’ll be your executor if needed. I’ll ensure she never runs out of ammo heh.
Let’s be honest, that’s the most important thing these days.
I know, it makes sense that the viruses can adapt.
To me the whole risk/reaction with this virus was totally out of wack from the start.
The Left’s first instinct was to use it against Trump and they never let up.
Their fear-mongering was so successful that they couldn’t stop if they tried.
I was just in the giant and half the people are still masked up even though it’s not required.
I’d bet my next paycheck that 9 out of 10 of the mask-wearers are Democrats and they’ve already been vaccinated.
I will bet the Over and bet that most of the people that took the vaccine will be alive in two years.
I will not take you up on that bet for two immediate reasons.
You’re probably right.
I can’t afford to lose a bet when there’s ammo available.
Not gonna take it til its proven safe, and there has not been time to do so yet. But not going to believe its 100 fatal in two years til thats proven. Biology is complicated. We need Empirical evidence to know for sure no matter who we are.
1:16 - 1:27:
"I also want to say that I never, never said that everyone will die from the vaccine, but that a certain number of people who take the vaccine will suffer from it. That's impermissible."
Yep...Do what’s possible with the known preventative measures and leave the rest with the Almighty.
Wow, an absolutely amazing argument full of substance and information. Oh wait, you cannot make those kind of arguments. Oh well, so I guess I will speak in your rhetorical style
I see you are still and idiot attempting to practice medicine while having utterly no idea what you are talking about. When the facts kill your argument (Even using your inflated numbers, vaccination is 5x safer than driving a car) you turn to name calling. So are you done driving because you are 5x more likely to die in your car than with the vaccine?
Are you advocating that no one else drive because of the unsafeness of being on the road?
Of course you will not answer, because to answer is to admit the truth.
You’re not coming across looking real sharp here.
I want to know all the studies that have been done with these so called vaccines that can promise that in five years there will be no ill effects from these shots.
We will bury you cheap. lol
What on earth causes you to launch an attack on someone who hasn’t uttered a work to you? Are you so afraid of my argument that you think I need a pre-emptive ad hominem attack. Is your last name Alinsky?
YOU, ain’t too bright.
I glossed over your drivel so fast because of the complete lack of intelligence in that post.
I don’t need to argue at all, there’s nothing to argue. The facts are coming to the surface more so every day. Also, I don’t argue with people with severe mental retardation, I don’t like taking candy from a small child. Although most small children I know also employ more sense than you’re capable of.
Good evening, and may you find calmer weather in some communist site elsewhere and a good position in the upcoming politburo.
You dont need to argue because you cannot. And you admit that you gloss over statements and still launch attacks. Wow, you really do give us conservatives a bad name.
And as you are completely predictable you do not even answer a data driven question. Your silence on the question is deafening.
It really is a joy to watch you admit and be proud of your ignorance and lack of intellectual curiosity.
Well, that will generate tens of millions of new democrat voters.
Oh come on. what you posted is just pure bull shit and you know it. Only a dumb ass would believe it.
Less than 1% improvement in Absolute Risk Ratio is not for the Greater Good.
No, “95% effectivity” is not meaningful. It is Relative Risk - meaningless.
You can even leave out the risks of taking the vaccine, and look at:
- The costs of distribution and development for the taxpayer
- The further promotion of abortion
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.