[thecodont]

“removal of a sitting president”

Not legally or Constitutionally a president. Did not honestly win the election. Fraudulent.

[Steve Van Doorn]

said, "“removal of a sitting president”
Not legally or Constitutionally a president. Did not honestly win the election. Fraudulent.

Exactly. Entered into a fraudulent contract (constitution)
It's a no brainier.
This took place in a few countries. The most recent one I remember was
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alberto_Fujimori#Resignation,_arrest,_and_trial

[Cletus.D.Yokel]

:: Not legally or Constitutionally a president. Did not honestly win the election. Fraudulent. ::

We should avoid all the “horse before the cart” arguments.
We should procure absolute proof, court-level evidence of the fraud perpetrated.
Anyone (including me, I admit) who speculates or worries about what will happen after the fraud is proven is operating from an unproven presupposition.
Jenna Ellis is contributing to the background \noise\.
I for one am done with this angle and am fully supporting the Arizona audit and any others that may come on line.
Election integrity is “apartisan”, owing no allegiance to any political ideology other than the self-determination
of the American people .

[Bigg Red]

Exactly