PING
LD50 matters when discussing toxicity.
This is dumb.
Please read:
https://www.nebraskamed.com/COVID/sm-102-moderna-vaccine
Comment section is hysterical.
I see some have gone off the deep end on this subject.
Thank you for posting research articles on Covid-19.
Fail!
Regards,
The dose makes the poison; if your water is chlorinated, you ingest minute amounts of chloroform all the time.
Decided long ago not to accept any covid vaccine....
There are plenty of causes for concern as regards COVID policy and the current regime; chloroform ain’t one of them, Alex Jones notwithstanding.
For example: from Environ Health Perspect., 2008 Jan;116(1):57-63.
“Exogenous and endogenous determinants of blood trihalomethane levels after showering”
‘Background: We previously conducted a study to assess whether household exposures to tap water increased an individual’s internal dose of trihalomethanes (THMs). Increases in blood THM levels among subjects who showered or bathed were variable, with increased levels tending to cluster in two groups.
. . .
‘Results: We did not observe the clustering of blood THM concentrations observed in our earlier study. We found that environmental THM concentrations were important predictors of blood THM concentrations immediately after showering. For example, the chloroform concentration in the shower stall air was the most important predictor of blood chloroform levels 10 min after the shower (p < 0.001).’
Translation: If you take a shower, you’re probably going to increase your blood levels of chloroform (which is a “THM”, or trihalomethane, the subject of the paper cited). The amounts are so small they don’t really matter. Ditto for the chloroform in a slug of vaccine.
How is this a bombshell since the FDA made the ingredient list for the Moderna shot available back on March 26, at least?

Oh, OK.. Alex Jones.
Next.

There's no way in hell I could honestly sign this.
There are several cofounding factors. One that the site people are quoting, manufactures a formulation of SM-102 for research use only (RUO), because what is sold is 90% chloroform.
You can, by clicking a link on their site, request solvent removal, but there is no MSDS directly on the page for "pure" SM-102.
From the MSDS for their formulation, are the lines:
· Label elements
· GHS label elements
The product is classified and labeled according to the Globally Harmonized System (GHS).
· Hazard pictograms
d~ GHS02
d~ GHS06
d~ GHS07
d~ GHS08
d~ GHS09
· Signal word Danger
· Hazard-determining components of labeling: Chloroform
· Hazard statements
H225 Highly flammable liquid and vapor.
H302 Harmful if swallowed.
H310 Fatal in contact with skin.
H315 Causes skin irritation.
H319 Causes serious eye irritation.
H351 Suspected of causing cancer.
H361 Suspected of damaging fertility or the unborn child.
H372 Causes damage to the central nervous system, the kidneys, the liver and the respiratory system
through prolonged or repeated exposure.
H402 Harmful to aquatic life.
H410 Very toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effects.
Still looking around trying to find an MSDS for "pure" SM-102.
I died after the first dose. The 2nd wasn’t that bad tho
Put. The National Enquirer. Down.
I’ve had both shots. Not dead yet. Not even pining for the fjords. Total BS.
For God’s sake…don’t look at Cummodin. It’s rat poison.