Tucker Carlson on the Covid Vaccine Cover-Up

Fox News

[ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton]

I figure most FREEPERS have seen Tuckers opening segment on Covid vaccination fatalities but if you haven’t it is well worth it. He also ties this in with the vaccine complication censorship that big tech is pulling now: https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/tucker-carlson-how-many-americans-have-died-after-taking-the-covid-vaccine

[grey_whiskers]

Suck on this, good and hard, like a nervous person on a cigarette.

The original source for this is one of you pro-jab trolls, btw.

So *crickets* waiting for the inevitable catcalls of "conspiracy site" like patents.google.com the other day.

And while strong statements from Gamaleya and the RDIF dispute the findings, this isn’t the first observation that the Sputnik V doses submitted to regulators aren’t consistent with the phase 3 trial results published in Lancet.— Dr. Angela Rasmussen (@angie_rasmussen) April 28, 2021

More info here: apparently the Ad5 vector was capable of forming plaques on A549 cells. The explanation is recombination, which begs the question: if it was manufactured using best practices, WTF did the vaccine vector recombine with?
h/t @hildabasthttps://t.co/92h8UERLoO— Dr. Angela Rasmussen (@angie_rasmussen) April 28, 2021

If it can happen by accident (and the phase 3 trials lied about),

then it can be done on purpose (and the phase 3 trials -- or any trials, for that matter) lied about.

That is, recombination during formulation, which means all bets are off.

We only have the word of greedy, genocidal slime that it ISN'T happening.

(We know that such a thing as bribery exists in the world, before you start your feeble remonstrations of "Muh SAFETY and EFFICACY tests, because GOVERNMENT. And SCIENCE™¡"

Science only works if everyone is honest and upfront. And with multiple billions at stake -- and, possibly more, if the was even a mere investigatory precursor to a Chicom bioweapon -- it's gonna take more than your sneers and raised eyebrows and ___ing your own ____ in my face, to get me to accept mere credentials as a proof of good faith.

[IrishBrigade]

‘Nothing more...I.E. no attack—’

I have zero idea why you tagged me in this post; I didn’t even respond to the post you quoted...

I agreed with something Guenevere posted, and added a thought of my own in support...specifically that the general tenor of anti-vaccination postings has changed dramatically in a very short period of time, from one of ‘it’s your choice’ to ‘you’re the devil if you do...’

[grey_whiskers]

You're quoting the CDC.

You lose.

[ProtectOurFreedom]

You've got to read your post closely! You wrote "...many more in the expended part [of my family]."

I was just wondering which part of your family was expended?

I'm guessing you meant to write "extended part." I thought that was a hilarious typo (unless you really did expend some relatives).

[mrsmith]

A thread abouit REJECTED batch of Sputnik V..
https://twitter.com/angie_rasmussen/status/1387397186372005893

“E1/E3 deletions are standard in Ad-vectors. Deleting E1 prevents the virus from replicating and deleting E3 prevents it from interacting with the immune system.
...
When making adenovirus-vectored vaccines, once you’ve deleted a region of the genome, it doesn’t just reappear out of nowhere. The presence of replicating virus suggests E1 was either not deleted or it recombined during manufacturing with a full length AdV genome...

It’s a basic and inexcusable failure of QC/QA.”

Yes, I would say it a “conspiracy theory” to claim everyone is deliberately producing bad vaccines.

[bgill]

Thanks.

More have died in the past 3 months from the vax than have died from all the vaccines in the past 15 years. And that doesn’t include all the weird problems that it has caused. Sweden is now reporting nearly 2000 with blindness and eye problems.

[bagster]

Duh.

And from your very same trustworthy CDC.

Nothin' says 'juke the numbers' like CDC.

[RC one]

I see. So, the CDC is not to believed because??? but VAERS is totally legit even though it is managed by the CDC? Who just lost?

[familyop]

I haven’t watched television since 2003 and have avoided the Fox News website since the election.

[RC one]

The CDC manages VAERS. Their numbers must be junk too then. right? and BTW, the decrease in flu cases has been explained about a million times. And also, we haven’t had a flu season with over 500,000 deaths in over 100 years.

[IrishBrigade]

‘I’m guessing you meant to write “extended part.” I thought that was a hilarious typo (unless you really did expend some relatives).’

I think you’re responding to the wrong poster; but that aside, yes, it was a witty play on a typo (that I didn’t notice)...

[bagster]

I see. So, the CDC is not to believed because??? but VAERS is totally legit even though it is managed by the CDC? Who just lost?

Ya goof. Of course VAERS is not totally legit. The numbers are WAY under reported. And then shills like you will tell us that the STILL OUTRAGEIOUS and unprecedented numbers mean nothing.

Here's the bottom line, and write this down.

Your government lies to you, and they have for a very long time.

[grey_whiskers]

You're lying again, and in a particularly amateurish fashion.

You pro mRNA trolls kept on insisting that people opposed to mRNA are "flat earthers" and "rubes" who don't know science.

I've seen here on FR, pro-jabbers loudly insisting that it is IMPOSSIBLE for jab genetic material to get into the human genome, "because RNA isn't DNA, you peon." That despite Harvard and MIT researchers finding COVID genetic information in the DNA of human patients of COVID. If the live virus genetic material can get into human DNA, that means RNA can under the right circumstances, can get into human DNA.

Are those circumstances possible with the jab?

Now, I've had a pro-jabber, YOU, tell me verbatim that I didn't understand the science, by falsely accusing me of being an "anti-VAXXER" and that I believed in virus shedding.

Both charges are false.

But the best part, is that the Twitter link YOU posted, and QUOTED FROM, to the effect that the COVID vaccine viruses cannot reproduce, because the relevant portions of their genome had been removed...

that link talked about

a) recombination of the virus used in the jab, while being formulated (impossible if the virus can't reproduce)

b) the company involved LYING about the clinical trials involved in that jab.

So it's not me cherry picking from "conspiracy sites."

I'm quoting from the original source used by a pro-Jabber, who was trying to SUPPORT the jab.

[DugwayDuke]

grey_whiskers wrote: “Suck on this, good and hard, like a nervous person on a cigarette. The original source for this is one of you pro-jab trolls, btw.”

This is all about the Soviet Sputnik vaccine which is not available in the US so this is just another of the anti-vaxxer red herrings.

[grey_whiskers]

Yes, I would say it a “conspiracy theory” to claim everyone is deliberately producing bad vaccines.

I never claimed that.

This was your site, not mine.

And all it did was PROVE

1) it is possible to make vaccines which undergo recombination--> the virus in them can reproduce

2) at least one company has openly deliberately lied through their teeth about vaccine trials.

This does NOT inspire confidence, given the increased fascistic nature of those pushing the jabs (https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3956915/posts)

[jimjohn]

...

[bagster]

The CDC manages VAERS. Their numbers must be junk too then. right?

Correct. Continue.

And also, we haven’t had a flu season with over 500,000 deaths in over 100 years.

Here's a simple excercise.

Take all the people that would have normally died from the flu, and subtract that number from the fake covid death count.

Then take the number of people who died from other things but were SUSPECTED of having covid , or had it in the past, , and subtract that number. Then take the number of deaths that got the covid box checked so hospitals could rake in the government funds (and don't try to tell me that isn't happening), and subtract that number.

Then we can talk.

[DugwayDuke]

bagster wrote: “Okay, I think I get it. VAERS is a useless tool. All of a sudden. When it suits you and the rest of the derps.”

There you go again with another strawman argument. VARES is a useful tool, just not for what you want to use it for.

[grey_whiskers]

LOL! Nice try, troll-boi.

VAERS is a voluntary self-selecting reporting system, which means it is not subject to spin in the same way an "official pronouncement" of the political-powers-that-be at the CDC are.

And look -- so far from sweeping it under the rug, I'm putting your accusation of me right there in my reply to it.

My god this is like shooting fish in a barrel.

[IrishBrigade]

‘Their numbers must be junk too then. right?’

any topic that generates as much heat as this one has done is going to have disputed numbers on both sides; I maintain that CDC has an incentive to inflate numbers, and I likewise posit that CDC’s foes seize the intiative to peddle phony information as well...

I maintain, and I always have, that healthy skepticism in all things is good, the old saw ‘believe half of what you see, and none of what you hear’ comes to mind...and if anything deserves a skeptical reception, it is this covid and its mixed messaging guidance...