Say it loud and say it proud. Any stroke the day after the vax is 'just coincidental'.
And Bill Clinton did not have sexual relations with that woman. Monica Lewinsky.
~~~~~~~~~~~~
While the calculated est of 350,000 strokes among the vaccinated is hideously low, because so many vax strokes are not being counted, let's work with this undercount for now.
According to vax-bot, 44% of the year's likely total 'just coincidentail' strokes occurred in a 4 month vaccination window strictly among about 30% of the US population within a few days of getting the 'vaccines' at a rate, which if it continued, would render a minimum of 250,000 more strokes than a normal for the year?
(350,000 est. per 4 months X 3 = 1,050,000 strokes for the year) = 250,000 more strokes during the Year of the Vax compared with prior years.
What about strokes among those not yet vaccinated? If we want to limit the year's increase to a miminum undercount of 250,000 excess people having strokes for the year, all those unvaccinated people can't have a stroke. So 70% of the population must be stroke free or BLAM! There goes vax boy's math.
I guess the unvaccinated can heave a sigh of relief because they are gonna be stroke free, amIright?
Say, what if 70% of the population actually strokes at the same rate vax-boi proposes for 'just coincidental' strokes following within days of a vax?
Let's see, the estimated 350,000 vax's among aprox 30% of US population..... 70% divided by 30% = 2.33 X 350,000= 816,666 'just coincidental' strokes among the un vaccinated DURING THAT SAME 4 MONTH WINOW?
The Vaccianted 350,000 strokes + the unvaccinated 816,666 strokes = 1,166,666 strokes for the 4 month window and lets multiply by 3 to get 12 months of 'accidental' strokes = 3,499,998
So an estimated 3,499,998 'Year of the Vax' strokes compared with an average of 800,000 strokes annual without the coincidental vax.
There's a problem with the estimate because they preyed upon the elderly first - the most vulnerable were 'targeted' for vax so the 4 month window will include more strokes and as the elderly are culled, the monthly rate of 'just coincidence strokes will decline'.
However, there are some indications that the elderly are 'dropping like flies' as has been supported by a CNA watching his patients die abruptly and their deaths dismissed as 'Covid superspreaders' or 'he was old' so there's a signficant number of uncounted strokes in the 4 month 'just coincidence' window among the vaxxed.
Then there's anaphylaxis, cardiac events, neurological damage etc. etc. etc. Recurring strokes among those 'not tolerating' the vax will have to be counted, amIright?
Gosh, if only we could use Ivermectin, the inhaler, the HCQ protocol...you know...all those other treatments that don't have estimates of millions of additional strokes.
But.....then THAT would do away with the whole *need* for these money making (off of the US tax payer) experimental, unproven agents/shots.....in Pharmaworld, anyway.
The over 140 million people vaccinated, include most of those likely to have strokes - 82% of those over 65, for example. The overwhelming majority of those with previously diagnosed cardiovascular disorders (including prior history of stroke), are also among the subset who were vaccinated.
What is your estimate of how many strokes should be expected after vaccination of that population (out of the roughly 800,000 annual average), if there was no causative relationship whatsoever? How many should be expected out of random coincidence?