Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ransomnote; bagster; Jane Long; metmom

The over 140 million people vaccinated, include most of those likely to have strokes - 82% of those over 65, for example. The overwhelming majority of those with previously diagnosed cardiovascular disorders (including prior history of stroke), are also among the subset who were vaccinated.

What is your estimate of how many strokes should be expected after vaccination of that population (out of the roughly 800,000 annual average), if there was no causative relationship whatsoever? How many should be expected out of random coincidence?


138 posted on 04/28/2021 12:42:47 PM PDT by BeauBo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]


To: BeauBo
What is your estimate of how many strokes should be expected after vaccination of that population (out of the roughly 800,000 annual average), if there was no causative relationship whatsoever? How many should be expected out of random coincidence?

Sorry, I don't have any idea, nor do I give much of a 's'. I'm a simple man and I cant' abide your numbers game. I do know this. People are taking the vax , dropping dead, having strokes, miscarriages, and a host of other things one would expect by jamming an unknown weird chemical into their bodies. And that's just in the short term.

You can play your ticky tack numbers and semantic games all day long, but those were not coincidences, as much as you want them to be.

If you want to convince me, then prove they would have stroked out, etc; if they hadn't taken the vax.

Good luck with that.


139 posted on 04/28/2021 12:53:25 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]

To: bagster; Jane Long; metmom
Here's the link to the VAERS data set of Covid-19 vaccine records used for this discussion. I encourage people to copy and paste the data I exported from VAERS for 4/16/2021  into MS Excel to explore the records for themselves.

The CDC doesn't want you to have this information so they modified their program last night to make it othrewise inaccessible going forward. Therefore, share it loud, share it proud with everyone.

https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3920760/posts?page=2647#2647

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

VAERS Covid 'vaccine' records with the word 'Stroke'
Sorted by Age

I did account for that. I explained the problem is the elderly are 'dropping like flies' and are not being counted, so even though strokes are prevalent among the elderly, they are being seriously undercounted to begin with and therefore the base counts used to estimate the overall number of strokes in the Year of the Vax are too low.

I don't have factors to work with to see by what amount uncounted 'dropping like files' strokes offset 'elderly preyed upon first w/vax strokes', but you've worn my patience thin anyway with your insistance that an obvious wave of strokes on or in the few days after vaccination mean nothing. You're saying data means nothing, so why ask me for data?

The reason I post and share the link to the table of stroke information is so that people can read the accounts themselves, read all those "she was fine and then she had the vax' accounts and make up their own minds as to whether the CDC should look again at this information to see if they, too, can perceive a pattern.

 

Here's the link to the original thread I posted: 

CDC VAERS and Covid-19 ‘Vaccines’: Under Reporting Adverse Events, Hiding Stroke Data? (freerepublic.com)

142 posted on 04/28/2021 1:26:13 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson