Well, she saw the same evidence they did.
It is Interesting, but we all know CBS News would not have a juror on who did not confirm to their desired narrative.
She believed Dr. Tobin.
She also didn’t understand the concept of “reasonable doubt”.
Just trying to Suck Up
She heard all the testimony, but admits to being ruled by emotions instead of intelligence. Just the kind of sucker the prosecutors love to play. All that evidence pro and con and what affected her most was some teenager who felt guilty about not helping. Lord have mercy.
Hope you’re happy with your 15 minutes, loser. Now go back to your TV set.
Alternate juror talks about the Chauvin trial verdict and the testimony that “really got to me”
You mean, it wasn’t the severed pig’s head?
“During the 13 days of sometimes tense and emotional testimony and cross-examination, both the prosecution and defense promised the jury that they were going to prove their case, but Christensen said only one side did.”
Ummm...it is NOT the job of the defense to PROVE the defendant is innocent. If a reasonable person could DOUBT their guilt, they go free. “Beyond a reasonable doubt” is a very tough standard for an impartial jury!
If there is a plausible way Floyd could die without Chauvin causing it, Chauvin should go free.
In a civil trial, the standard is “more likely than not”. I could see Chauvin losing in a civil trial. But there was absolutely a possibility that Floyd died of a heart attack brought on by his exertions while resisting arrest. That is a no brainer. And if it was a plausible possibility, then that IS “reasonable doubt”!
All emotion, all the time.
Not a shred of logical thought.
This is how primitives think and act.
Get used to it.
“She was an alternate juror, she did not take part in deliberations and thinks she knows enough about the case to pass judgment.”
As an alternate, she would have been a witness to deliberations
Perhaps juries should not only have to say guilty or not guilty, but to specify the fact set upon which a guilty verdict is based.
“609.19 MURDER IN THE SECOND DEGREE
....
§Subd. 2.Unintentional murders. Whoever does either of the following is guilty of unintentional murder in the second degree and may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than 40 years:
(1) causes the death of a human being, without intent to effect the death of any person, while committing or attempting to commit a felony offense other than criminal sexual conduct in the first or second degree with force or violence or a drive-by shooting; or...”
What was that felony offense?
Why didn’t the prosecutor charge for it?
Why didn’t the judge insist on the prosecutor charge Chauvin for a specified felony before charging Chauvin for second degree murder?
What really got me was his hollering and hollering and hollering. Can’t holler if you can’t breathe.
“I was worried about, you know, whatever the verdict may be if some people felt strongly on one side, other people felt strongly on the other side. So no matter what, I felt like somebody wasn’t going to be happy,” Christensen told CBS News’ Jamie Yuccas.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Translation....”I had already made my mind up before the trial started that I would be voting to convict because I knew my life and property would be in serious peril and there would be endless burn/loot/murder that would result.”
Hennepin and Ramsey County include most of the Minneapolis and St. Paul metro area.
Both counties voted more than 70% for Biden.
Trump won the rest of the state by 230,000 votes.
Surprisingly, both and Hennepin and Ramsey are below 14% Black.
Ramsey is over 15% Asian.
The Twin Cities are more than 65% white.
I’m guessing you have never been on a jury
“It was emotional. I think my eyes teared up a couple of times, so especially seeing it from different angles and things,”?”
Ruled by her mommy emotions. Women have no business on a jury like this. This is for men. No more than I have on a jury for securities contracts fraud.
She moved faster to the TV cameras than she does even to the all you can eat buffet
She sounded dumb as a rock. The only thing I could make out from the interview was her pleading for money for book rights.
There will be no fair trials anymore. The courts are compromised.
Antifa/blm, under the protected status of the DoJ, will intimidate jurors, as well as justices. Deepstate has control of the judicial branch.