The tiny tweak behind COVID-19 vaccines [September 29, 2020]

cen.acs.org ^ | SEPTEMBER 29, 2020 | Ryan Cross

[ransomnote]

House Atreides: You show me a legitimate researcher who cannot obtain “live” cultures of the SARS-CoV-2 virus (the one that causes COVID-19 disease) and I’LL SHOW YOU AN INEPT MORON. Sorry, but that’s the truth.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

ransomnote: To anyone following along, this issue has percolated beneath the surface of many articles I've read by researchers, virologists, and doctors.

I've read many researchers who have said that when they ask for an isolated sample of the virus, they are told by CDC that no such samples are available 'at this time.' Gosh, if only researchers could have had isolated samples from the start, we could have accurate research, other non-toxic vaccine development, and drug trials etc.

This telling 'unavailability' is hotly debated by people who shriek that isolated samples are everywhere, researchers have it, the CDC sent a notice saying samples are available etc! (such claims always have an exclamation point).EndNote1

And yet, researchers continue(d) to be told 'unavailable.'

So I believe China never gave its targets (e.g., us) isolated samples of the virus they weaponized, nor the accurate genome sequence of that virus.

Researchers who have electron microscopy images and other 'hard research' were either given the equivalent of a 'press packet' of images, models by China, are actually trusted by China (!) not to share information or reveal content which indicates it was engineered by China, or they have taken the time to isolate their own samples.

Some of our researchers or western researchers have figured out a sort of 'family tree' of viral strains that led to Covid-19 as China tweaked the recipe for "Gain of Function" courtesy of funding from Anthony Fauci.

The virus does exist, it's just not what China says it is, not where the PCR says it is, and not what the drug manufacturers 'product' is designed to defeat.

As a result of this "isolated samples are not available"/"Yes they are!" struggle, some researchers have apparently decided to double down by stating flatly that the virus does not exist. They seem to want the 'other side' to put up or shut up. "Give me a sample or admit it doesn't exist."

To cover exposed backsides (an insufficient metaphor when one is talking about crimes against humanity), I've seen research in pub med (NIH Database of accepted research) completed around fall of 2020 giving the whole 'new' idea of basing vaccination development on genome sequences, instead of the actual virus, a pathetic thumbs up. They are preparing to refute objections to their inexcusable acctions.

REFERENCES BELOW:

1. https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/3944996/posts

"Has the existence of “the Virus” been established according to a universally acknowledged set of scientific procedures that must be observed to establish the existence of any and all other viruses? 

From the sounds of it, the answer is a resounding no.
Dr. Tom Cowan, Dr. Andrew Kaufman, and Sally Fallon Morell, are among those who have noted in a paper published last year that in demonstrating the existence of a new virus, samples must, firstly, be taken from the blood, phlegm, or other secretions of hundreds of people exhibiting symptoms that are “unique and specific enough to characterize an illness.”

Then, “without mixing these samples with ANY tissue or products that also contain genetic material, the virologist macerates, filters, and ultracentrifuges, i.e. purifies the specimen.” This, the authors explain, is a “common virology technique, done for decades to isolate bacteriophages [viruses that infect bacteria and reproduce within them] and so-called giant viruses [a virus larger than typical bacteria].” 

Thirdly, once virologists perform this procedure, they are then able to “demonstrate with electron microscopy thousands of identically sized and shaped particles.”  The latter are “the isolated and purified virus.” 

Fourthly, upon determining the purity of these particles, virologists are able to examine their “structure, morphology, and chemical composition [.]”

Fifthly, “the genetic makeup” of the particles [the virus] “is characterized by extracting the genetic material directly from” them and “using genetic-sequencing techniques” that have long been in existence. They are told they can have isolated samples of the virus and when they ask, they are told samples are 'unavailable'. Some have decided to push back on the unavailability of isolated samples of the virus by declaring something equivalent to "The virus doesn't exist! PROVE ME WRONG!" Here's an example:

[ransomnote]

The only real lasting value from their sequence, is that we know that their virus is tracking through our people. Its not something new or different. Once they published their sequence, we sequenced it ourselves several times to check for variances. And by the way, shortly after they published the sequence it was taken off their sites. And it became criminal to publish anything about the virus. And those who published it have disappeared.

I do agree that there may have been other virus’ released which did not go out of china. They were falling in the streets. That only seemed to happen there, not other places. Odd. Either that was staged, or they had another disease that stopped in Wuhan.
~~~~~~~~~~~~

There's more here than meets the eye. Why were we waiting for China to release the genome when we could have sequenced it ourselves?

Why did we base our vaccines on their gene sequence in the first place?

Why have some said it's impossible to create a vaccine from a gene sequence?

Why is there a NIH pub med article published in fall 2020 saying that maybe we should start creating vaccines from sequences to save time?

Why did the CDC publish, in July 2020, information stating isolated samples of the virus, needed for traditional vaccine  and drug development, were not available? Vaccines were being trialed at the time, and still no virus samples available?

Those are just some of the questions that arise when studying the development of the vaccines based on China's released genome. 

The CDC is lying, has finacial ties to pharma, Fauci has funded gain of function studies in Wuhan, and plans to continue funding Wuhan. The Tech Giants, CDC, NIH etc. have made the idea of a 2nd opinion almost illegal and punishing those who speak anything but the party line. No, something is definitely wrong.

[mrsmith]

Quickly found a report of a European sequencing on
January 31, 2020.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/01/200131114748.htm

Hope that suffices for my point. China was first but others came quickly along.

[bagster]

***smart people only read this***

On Friday January 24, late in the morning, the Institut Pasteur received samples of three suspected cases (two patients in Paris and one in Bordeaux).

Okay, not being an expert and after reading Ransomnote's post (again and again), I have these observations/questions.

So the French frogs got samples of coronavirus (from suspected cases) to make their 'sequences'. We know two things. The Chinese provided the first and only 'sequence' and the PCR test doesn't work.

So my question is this. How did the frogs know what they found was the 'coronavirus' if they had nothing legit to compare it to and no way of legimately testing for it? They must have compared their 'sequences' with the heathen Chinee provided ones, amirite?

So if the heathen Chinee 'sequences' were phony, and the new ones matched, then the new ones would be phony too, eh?

Sooooooooooooooooooooo, in conclusion. The 'western' vaccines are ultimately Chinese vaccines. Correct?

Seems logical to me.

Serious question. Or am I way off base here.

Answers from Ransomnote and Null and Void only, please. This one is over your cut and paste paygrade, mith. Thinking is not in your repertoire. That goes for any other cut and paste FR proto-scientist genius vaxholes.

ThankQ you in advance, smart people.

[null and void]

Answers from Ransomnote and Null and Void only, please.

?

[null and void]

Why have some said it's impossible to create a vaccine from a gene sequence?

They don't know that worse, making an active virus from a gene sequence, has already been done?

People Could Make Smallpox from Scratch in a Lab, Scientists Warn wherein they describe a close cousin of smallpox, horsepox being made from scratch in 2017.

This follows: Biologists Have Built An Artificial Chromosome From Scratch in 2014...

[bagster]

People who have demonstrated an ability to reason after absorbing information. And can then explain things in plain english after applying thought.

There are others, but you two are here. Its a compliment.

[bagster]

(The Borg) instead of actively invading and forced conversions, they could have simply parked a cube in earth orbit and offered Borg immortality to anyone in extremis.

You're thinking of this one...

[null and void]

A bit like that, except the Borg would be offering a service they actually intend to deliver, after a fashion...

[SecAmndmt]

The CCP is bad, except they are good when they are sharing the (alleged) genetic sequence for the virus they engineered with Fauci gain of function research dollars.

Why would CCP try to hurt us? They love us so much, we get all their best fentanyl.

[BraveMan]

I want the T-shirt license to the “mad dragon disease”!

[null and void]

A small cut and a free T-shirt?

[wgmalabama]

How in the hell did Moderna COVID-19 vaccine mRNA-1273 get to clinical trials by Feb 25 2020? It was even discussed at event 201 in 2019 but you can’t links to it anymore.

Here is the trial initiation for mRNA-1273:

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04283461?term=mrna-1273&draw=2

China released the DNA in January 11. So they created the vaccine, created trial parameters, and issued the trial request in about 45 days.

Wow. Yeah it wasn’t rushed because it was planned or it was rushed and the probably of long term issues are very high.

How do you go from genetic sample, animal studies, cellular studies to human trials in 45 days ? Anyone have an opinion on this?

[ransomnote]

How in the hell did Moderna COVID-19 vaccine mRNA-1273 get to clinical trials by Feb 25 2020? It was even discussed at event 201 in 2019 but you can’t links to it anymore.

Here is the trial initiation for mRNA-1273:

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04283461?term=mrna-1273&draw=2

China released the DNA in January 11. So they created the vaccine, created trial parameters, and issued the trial request in about 45 days.

Wow. Yeah it wasn’t rushed because it was planned or it was rushed and the probably of long term issues are very high.

How do you go from genetic sample, animal studies, cellular studies to human trials in 45 days ? Anyone have an opinion on this?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Good question - thank you for asking it! So many just passive accept 'the narrative'.

I believe the 'vaccines' were developed by China and released by American companies. Sorry but all indications point to preplanning and I don't believe China ever gave us actual samples of the virus, just the genome.

poinq: The only real lasting value from their sequence, is that we know that their virus is tracking through our people. Its not something new or different.

 

Once they published their sequence, we sequenced it ourselves several times to check for variances. And by the way, shortly after they published the sequence it was taken off their sites. And it became criminal to publish anything about the virus. And those who published it have disappeared.

I do agree that there may have been other virus’ released which did not go out of china. They were falling in the streets. That only seemed to happen there, not other places. Odd. Either that was staged, or they had another disease that stopped in Wuhan.
~~~~~~~~~~~~

ransomnote: There's more here than meets the eye. Why were we waiting for China to release the genome when we could have sequenced it ourselves?

Why did we base our vaccines on their gene sequence in the first place?

Why have some said it's impossible to create a vaccine from a gene sequence?

Why is there a NIH pub med article published in fall 2020 saying that maybe we should start creating vaccines from sequences to save time?

Why did the CDC publish, in July 2020, information stating isolated samples of the virus, needed for traditional vaccine  and drug development, were not available? Vaccines were being trialed at the time, and still no virus samples available?

Those are just some of the questions that arise when studying the development of the vaccines based on China's released genome. 

The CDC is lying, has finacial ties to pharma, Fauci has funded gain of function studies in Wuhan, and plans to continue funding Wuhan.

The Tech Giants, CDC, NIH etc. have made the idea of a 2nd opinion almost illegal and punishing those who speak anything but the party line. No, something is definitely wrong.

82 posted on 4/11/2021, 11:06:28 AM by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)

Once they published their sequence, we sequenced it ourselves several times to check for variances. And by the way, shortly after they published the sequence it was taken off their sites. And it became criminal to publish anything about the virus. And those who published it have disappeared.

I do agree that there may have been other virus’ released which did not go out of china. They were falling in the streets. That only seemed to happen there, not other places. Odd. Either that was staged, or they had another disease that stopped in Wuhan.
~~~~~~~~~~~~

ransomnote: There's more here than meets the eye. Why were we waiting for China to release the genome when we could have sequenced it ourselves?

Why did we base our vaccines on their gene sequence in the first place?

Why have some said it's impossible to create a vaccine from a gene sequence?

Why is there a NIH pub med article published in fall 2020 saying that maybe we should start creating vaccines from sequences to save time?

Why did the CDC publish, in July 2020, information stating isolated samples of the virus, needed for traditional vaccine  and drug development, were not available? Vaccines were being trialed at the time, and still no virus samples available?

Those are just some of the questions that arise when studying the development of the vaccines based on China's released genome. 

The CDC is lying, has finacial ties to pharma, Fauci has funded gain of function studies in Wuhan, and plans to continue funding Wuhan.

The Tech Giants, CDC, NIH etc. have made the idea of a 2nd opinion almost illegal and punishing those who speak anything but the party line. No, something is definitely wrong.