Posted on 04/09/2021 12:35:47 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
“...or in the death case, a version of it intended for fish”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
These people are sneaky. The writer is playing games with parallelism, implying the horse version of ivermectin and the “fish” version of HCQ are similarly dangerous.
The difference is that the HCQ for fish wasn’t actually for fish but rather for cleaning fish *tanks* and was chemically different from the HCQ intended for humans (it was a phosphate instead of a chloride or something like that). Meanwhile the horse version of ivermectin is chemically identical to the human version. Also, as far as I know, the horse version isn’t even more “concentrated.” It is true that the horse dose is proportionately larger, but that’s just what you’d expect given a horse’s greater weight.
Math is racist because it says global temperatures have not risen as predicted in EVERY climate model presented in the past.
Math is racist and sexist because it shows differences in IQ distribution between men and women, or the races.
Math is homophobic because it shows that 2% of the population is responsible for ~67% of all new HIV infections, even today.
Math is racist because it shows that some groups commit more violent crimes and end up in prison disproportionate to their overall representation in society.
Math shows us that if you pause your career, start later on average, end sooner on average, and get a soft science or art degree, and don’t do dirty or dangerous jobs, you earn less than those that work more years, don’t take a break, get engineering or science degrees, and take dirty or dangerous jobs.
***It’s science/math when a progressive/liberal says so.***
Like the “science” behind Covid with 6 or now 3 feet social distancing, closing public beaches and pools, schools, restaurants, and how masks will save us all. LOL
Any other time it’s racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, close minded, bigoted, ethnocentric, irresponsible, reckless , unprofessional or some other label used as a de facto ad hominem attack.
Ms. Abrams will be fine, then.
bkmk
Maybe if the FDA and CDC hadn’t worked overtime to ban, demonize, and bully doctors and pharmacists into not distributing drugs that are widely used, cheap, safe, and effective against COVID in many studies then people wouldn’t be looking for alternative ways to get them.
The buzz around ivermectin is reminiscent of hydroxychloroquine, an antimalarial drug that rose to prominence last year as a possible treatment for COVID-19. The drug was given a rocket boost when then-President Donald Trump revealed at a press conference he was taking hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin to ward off COVID-19, despite little evidence either worked.
Hydroxychloroquine became immensely politicized, but much of this hype ultimately fell flat and it never became the “game-changer” its supporters proclaimed it to be.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
ivermectin must work good for them to come out this strong against it?
(I had to check the date line to be sure it wasn’t from April 2020
Yeah, we can’t have people curing themselves for $10 when there’s an expensive (and potentially very dangerous) “vaccine” (that’s not really a vaccine - it’s sort of a biological program). The dose depends on body weight, and you can adjust it to a very small dose.
Are the people at the drive through injection sites paying as they go? Has anyone had to present their ‘Medicare Cards or other proof of insurance + ID ?
Thanks for the info. I get more reliable health information from doctors like Ken Berry and Berg on YouTube and from viewer comments. I consider anecdotal experience like your’s more important than FDA pronouncements.
Its political science.
Its politcal control of people under the guise/veneer of science.
Benevolent dictators.
Jan_Sobieski wrote: “Absolutely...except the minuscule problem with blood clots. But don’t worry everyone. Trust us...We will have this bug worked out real soon! /s”
Based upon the number of incidents and the number of doses administered, the chances of blood clots are about one in a million. One in a million risks are nothing to get excited about. Your chances of being struck by lightning are about one in 500,000, twice as much. I guess you’ll only go outside with a grounding rod attached.
yup.
The retracted study didn’t “sing the praises” of HCQ, it denied its effectiveness. This article can’t even parrot the warnings correctly.
RE: Yeah, we can’t have people curing themselves for $10 when there’s an expensive (and potentially very dangerous) “vaccine”
But it’s not expensive for anyone. It’s FREE.
This sneaky negation of Ivermectin has one aim: to dimish the reliance upon medications not in the ‘new vaccine’ monry makers for the big pharma devils. A tube for a horse can be dosed in six incrimants and be as safe as apple sauce. Six equal doses from a 12oomg tube works fine and without side effects ... unless you don’t like the flavor of apples.
Notice the AZ vax 2nd jab is being changed to Gates’ and Fauci’s Moderna mRNA-1273 vax. You know, their vax that was presented to the Gates’ Foundation Event 201 in Oct. 2019 before anyone outside the Wuhan lab (and a few extra special folk) ever heard of covid-19.
Which came first, the vax or the virus?
Hartz had to take “kills lice” off their dog shampoo many years ago because people were using it to kill kids’ head lice. It was/is cheaper than RID shampoo. If a 12 year old kid can use it on their 6 month old puppy and not die, then said 12 year old can use it on his head. Same lice on dog as kid. BTW, it’s the same ingredient list from before the label was changed.
1 CC per kilogram is the proper dosage I was told.
Each tube holds 1200 mg (if memory serves). Mark the tube to six portions of equal gel and you have approximately 200 mg per dose, a well within safety zone dose. The 200 mg is treating an approximatelt 200 pound person.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.