(h/t Secret Agent Man)
Posted on 04/02/2021 12:40:41 PM PDT by ransomnote
Date posted to Twitter: 4/1/2021
The woman in the video clip is frantically saying we can't be allowed to enjoy freedoms unless we get the vaccine, because otherwise if we're allowed to "go out and enjoy these freedoms anyway, we won't get the vaccine.
Disclose.tv 🚨 on Twitter: "🥕 https://t.co/SMmJd7S7Ss" / Twitter
Transcript of 38 second video of the woman speaking:Â
"We have to make it clear to them that the vaccine is the ticket back to pre-pandemic life, and the window to do that is really narrowing.
I mean, you were mentioning to us about how all these states are reopening. They’re reopening at a hundred percent, and we have a very narrow window to tie reopening policy to vaccination status, because otherwise if everything is reopened, then what’s the carrot going to be? How are we going to incentivize people to actually get the vaccine?
So that’s why I think the CDC and the Biden administration needs to come out a lot bolder and say, “If you’re vaccinated, you can do all these things, here are all these freedoms that you have. Because otherwise, people are going to go out and enjoy these freedoms anyway."
Too many so called freepers here love this woman and are totally on board with her statements.
besides the vaccines wont help anyways
we are NOT antiVAXERS.
just against using a new untested DNAoperatingSystem
(it says that in the dual use patents) on HUMANS as mice
for a BIOWEAPON made before the virus was released.
and using it on children before being tested even
to the level of a real vaccine. it was not.
why was it moved to Wuhan? it was a bioweapon
why was is patented with gain of function? 35USC101.
“I love it when they see you coming toward them and they hike up the diaper and veer out into the street; words are said by me when this happens...”
I see this behavior in the mountains. I mean the sticks at 10,000 feet. Intense UV.
So you subscribe to the notion that there is a conspiracy to “cull the population”
Ok, we agree
How do they do it?
They’ve told us
Gates, in his 2011 ted talk very plainly and clearly said they could reduce the global population through...
“Medical care”
“Vaccines”
“Family planning”
Well I KNOW what leftists mean when they twisted use the “family planning” term...it means killing unborn children. ABORTION
Logically, he was also saying that through medical intervenion and vaccination he could kill off people.
Pretty plain statements by him.
We also know that the globalist desire is to reduce the population by nearly 90% (depending who it is talking). Boris Johnson’s father said England should go from 70mm to 15mm people. Others have suggested 95%.
Bottom line is they want to kill a majority. This, in my understanding IS the gene therapy their pushing. They want a majority jabbed.
I don’t agree that they want a majority to survive and their real targets are the minority who reject the jab. The minority who reject the jab WILL be punished, mostly through being ostracized. And if this agenda continues, it will be bad for those who reject the jab.
The real target to reduce the majority of the population is the majority they want to get the jab. Gates told us the vaccine was one of the tools of his polite genocide.
So while we agree on the agenda and your circuitous theory is interesting, I disagree with your theory.
In fact, it unfortunately sounds like weak reverse logics to trick the unsuspecting into being one of their lab rats and who might inadvertently violate their own reason and conscience.
Respectful whisper
https://anti-empire.com/italian-researchers-vaccines-will-not-work-because-sars-cov-2-is-also-entering-bacteria/
~~~~~~~~~~~~
Thank you for the link. I posted it as a forum thread.
I wonder what the flubro/ flubras think of this.
Pfizer tested their vaccine on 30,000 people.
They didn’t drop dead or turn into lizards.
Look, I apologize for being to blunt or direct with my thoughts with you.
I don’t think you’re a bad person.
But your fear of something that you don’t have to partake in is puzzling to me.
Nothing to see here, you say?
Dr Lee Merritt - Army doctor, specialty bio-weapons.
Dr. Richard Fleming, MD, PhD, JD.
Prof. Sucharit Bhakdi – reasons for reservations
However the state of New Jersey, where I live and work requires all those who work in a health care facility to receive a flu shot. It's the law. Anyone that I've worked with in health care has ever objected to getting a flu shot.
RWJ Barnabas Health System, who I work for hasn’t mandated anyone to get a Covid vaccine. It’s entirely up to the individual.
However the state of New Jersey, where I live and work requires all those who work in a health care facility to receive a flu shot. It’s the law. Anyone that I’ve worked with in health care has ever objected to getting a flu shot.
~~~~~~~~~~
The medical staff deserve so much better than they actually get.
If the medical staff suffers unknown effects, or the known increased risk of ADE (link below), then our over-taxed medical care system will suffer as doctors and nurses become patients, with fewer staff and functioning hostipitals (lockdown) available to treat them.
Here’s research from 2020 in Pub Med (the gold standard for med research) which concludes that during the vaccine trials, and among future patients, all should be advised of the increased risk of worsening clinical disease.
EXCERPT:
“Results of the study: COVID-19 vaccines designed to elicit neutralising antibodies may sensitise vaccine recipients to more severe disease than if they were not vaccinated. Vaccines for SARS, MERS and RSV have never been approved, and the data generated in the development and testing of these vaccines suggest a serious mechanistic concern: that vaccines designed empirically using the traditional approach (consisting of the unmodified or minimally modified coronavirus viral spike to elicit neutralising antibodies), be they composed of protein, viral vector, DNA or RNA and irrespective of delivery method, may worsen COVID-19 disease via antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). This risk is sufficiently obscured in clinical trial protocols and consent forms for ongoing COVID-19 vaccine trials that adequate patient comprehension of this risk is unlikely to occur, obviating truly informed consent by subjects in these trials.”
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33113270/
Jane, I forgot to ping you FYI for the excerpt I posted at the bottom.
jmacusa wrote: RWJ Barnabas Health System, who I work for hasn’t mandated anyone to get a Covid vaccine. It’s entirely up to the individual.
However the state of New Jersey, where I live and work requires all those who work in a health care facility to receive a flu shot. It’s the law. Anyone that I’ve worked with in health care has ever objected to getting a flu shot.
~~~~~~~~~~
The medical staff deserve so much better than they actually get.
If the medical staff suffers unknown effects, or the known increased risk of ADE (link below), then our over-taxed medical care system will suffer as doctors and nurses become patients, with fewer staff and functioning hospitals (lockdown) available to treat them.
Here’s research from 2020 in Pub Med (the gold standard for med research) which concludes that during the vaccine trials, and among future patients, all should be advised of the increased risk of worsening clinical disease.
EXCERPT:
“Results of the study: COVID-19 vaccines designed to elicit neutralising antibodies may sensitise vaccine recipients to more severe disease than if they were not vaccinated. Vaccines for SARS, MERS and RSV have never been approved, and the data generated in the development and testing of these vaccines suggest a serious mechanistic concern: that vaccines designed empirically using the traditional approach (consisting of the unmodified or minimally modified coronavirus viral spike to elicit neutralising antibodies), be they composed of protein, viral vector, DNA or RNA and irrespective of delivery method, may worsen COVID-19 disease via antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). This risk is sufficiently obscured in clinical trial protocols and consent forms for ongoing COVID-19 vaccine trials that adequate patient comprehension of this risk is unlikely to occur, obviating truly informed consent by subjects in these trials.”
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33113270/
I even turned up ‘’positive asymptomatic'' and had to stay home for a week. I'm around it all day. Much as I hate to say but here in southern NJ there has been a slight uptick in the number of cases coming into our ER. In Ocean County, NJ where I live and work there is quite a huge senior citizen population and that's the majority of the cases.
please check your email
there is a rabbit trail you may be interested in
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.