[trebb]

“Brussels has bungled distribution, Germany is out of control, and this idiot is pushing don’t get the vaccine

Why do I heaar Fauci in my head saying, you don’t need masks? (save them for the medical people)”

Too funny - have you not seen the actual studies that say masks are “possibly” responsible for stopping “up to” 1.36% of cases - or, for every 1000 cases, mask “might have” stopped 14 cases...maybe.

Fauci told the truth early on - masks ain’t gonna save you p- then he changed his tune because he’s for full subjugation of the people by “those who know what’s good for them”.
R-95 masks are the lowest end of the spectrum for having a chance at stopping anything - yet they push “any type of face covering” because protection is not the goal - bind obedience is the goal.

There are a LOT of folks telling us what we should already know - nobody knows the actual long-term side effects and the “experts” who tell us to submit tell us not to worry while providing no data that says those who give warnings are full of it.

Don’t you find it a bit interesting that the prior Flu season had 38,000,000 cases and this Flu season had under 2,000 cases while Covid is around 30,000,000 cases?
How can we be in a pandemic when we have 8,000,000 fewer folks getting sick than in an average Flu season?

[Freedom56v2]

What does your post have to do with the study presented? I don’t believe the author had anything to do with the distribution of any of the COVID vaccines.

[jonrick46]

"have you not seen the actual studies that say masks are “possibly” responsible for stopping “up to” 1.36% of cases - or, for every 1000 cases, mask “might have” stopped 14 cases...maybe."

What side of the equation is this study giving? Is 1.36% of cases for the catchers or the throwers. This illustration describes the full situation: