Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/26/2021 6:16:36 AM PDT by Magnum44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Magnum44

I am not one to jump on the ‘4-d chess’ band wagon, but I think Trump knew his executive order would push this to a court ruling.


2 posted on 03/26/2021 6:24:03 AM PDT by Magnum44 (...against all enemies, foreign and domestic...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Magnum44

So, does this mean that bump stocks are again legal? Anyone still have them in the garbage can to retrieve?


3 posted on 03/26/2021 6:25:37 AM PDT by Reno89519 (Buy American, Hire American! End All Worker Visa Programs. Replace Visa Workers w/ American Worker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Magnum44

“The government shall infringe the right to keep and bear arms in a variety of ways, as shall be determined from time to time by legislation, executive orders, court orders and other such means as shall be deemed convenient at any given time, although this may or may not be subject to review and change at a later date, so who really knows?”

That right there is a direct quote from the Penumbra.


6 posted on 03/26/2021 6:32:20 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy ("I see you did something -- why you so racist?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Magnum44
The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) has no place setting ANY restrictions on firearms.

If anything, as a government agency, they should be promoting the manufacturing, sale, and use of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms.

9 posted on 03/26/2021 6:35:13 AM PDT by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Magnum44

The problems is that this is a ruling on the technical deficiency of the rule - the ATF is essentially assuming more power than the controlling statute has ceded to it - rather than a ruling on the constitutional merits of the ATF’s rule.

IOW, when Biden breaks the filibuster to ban most semi-automatics (which is coming WAY sooner rather than later), the bump stocks will be expressly prohibited by statutory law and not dependent on ATF discretion, essentially mooting this case. It will never be heard by the Supreme Court.


10 posted on 03/26/2021 6:46:11 AM PDT by ScubaDiver (Reddit refugee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Magnum44

Belt Loops can be used as “bump stocks”.


12 posted on 03/26/2021 6:59:15 AM PDT by G Larry (Authority is vested in those to whom it applies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Magnum44

Raise your hand if you ever bothered to get rid of your bump stock. 🙄


13 posted on 03/26/2021 7:12:46 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Magnum44

Obama looked into this issue three times and concluded that the executive branch doesn’t have the power to ban bump stocks.

Trump took one look and decided he did. TeamD types didn’t object because anything gungrabby is good. TeamR types didn’t object because it was Trump, not Obama, doing it.

But Obama was right on that one and Trump was wrong and I’m glad the 6th Circuit saw it that way.


15 posted on 03/28/2021 3:42:07 AM PDT by publiusF27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson