The CDC Says No Isolated Samples of the Covid-19 Virus Are Available. The Development of Covid-19 Vaccines Based

3/25/2021 | Vanity

[ransomnote]

 

According to the CDC, no isolated samples of the Covid-19 virus exist. The image below cites a July 2020 document but researchers continue to say their requests for isolated samples are denied because they are "unavailable". This limitation probably harms the race to develop drug treatments, leaving the field open to vaccine makers.

I've been wondering how the vaccine developers are creating their mRNA for Covid-19 if they don't have isolated samples. Perhaps the quote from the article below answers my question.

The tiny tweak behind COVID-19 vaccines
cen.acs.org ^ | SEPTEMBER 29, 2020 | Ryan Cross

"On Jan. 10, Chinese scientists uploaded the genetic sequence of a novel coronavirus, later named SARS-CoV-2, to an open-access website, GenBank.

SNIP

A few hours later, Barney Graham woke up and saw the sequence. Though it was a Saturday, he got right to work.

Days before, his lab at the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) had partnered with the biotech company Moderna to design an experimental vaccine for the virus, which causes the disease COVID-19. All they’d needed to start was that sequence."

I wonder if China uploaded the  genome to the biowarfare agent (Covid-19 virus) they released in order to help us develop a vaccine to protect ourselves from it. 

Personally I believe that China's biowarfare agent is likely the combination of  both the Covid-19 virus and the vaccines being created based on the genetic sequence they gave us.

Both the SARS-CoV-2 and vaccine mRNA have access to the reverse transcriptase enzyme, both of them can ‘upload’ their genetic sequence to the DNA (Modify the DNA to include their own images.

COVID-19 News: Harvard And MIT Study Alarmingly Shows That SARS-CoV-2 RNA Integrates Into Human Genome With Varying Implications

I think China may have outsourced biowarfare. I have wondered about some of the mRNA trials in the US leading up to the planned-demic.

[grey_whiskers]

It doesn’t matter whether you intended it to apply to me or not.
The term QTard itself is intrinsically derogatory, therefore, an example of the name-calling you had just said you didn’t do.

Liar. Troll. Doubling down.

And lying through your teeth again about the ransomnote thing.
You MISQUOTED what she wrote, by implying she called the CDC liars without evidence even though the OP and multiple replies in the thread, contained the evidence.

Sod off.

[David Chase]

Making post or posting news links or of interest type stuff and reading people’s reactions and comments is not the definition of a Troll.
It’s what FreeRepublic is. It’s what we do here.

Trust David Chase

[bagster]

“You deserve not an iota of credence, and should be removed from the thread polite society.”

Fixed it for ya', GW. You're welcome.

[grey_whiskers]

Trolls like you (as bagster just demonstrated in his graphic) should legitimately be removed.

That’s not the same as censorship, which Twitter does, nor again, the professional disruptor style on-thread psy-ops which you engage in.

[grey_whiskers]

Concur. Nice graphic on your earlier post, btw.

[grey_whiskers]

For it to be apt and descriptive, it has to be accurate.
It is inaccurate.

Therefore it is merely trolling.

[David Chase]

Ransomnote’s entire paragraph, unedited.

“ I don’t feel bad about not having proof because the CDC and the vaccine manufacturers are definitely lying about so much, they really can’t expect me to take their word for it. All negative information about the Covid-19 planned-demic and vaccines is being purged, so we fall back to secondary sources and then those doing the purging ridicule us for relying on secondary sources or struggles to find valid information at all.”

Make of it what you will.

Trust David Chase

[grey_whiskers]

Typical disinformation technique. The entire thread is chock-full of other links and posts by her, in support of that statement.
Your reply, acted liked that one sentence, was all she wrote and was in isolation.
Sod off.

[thecodont]

Was a vaccine ever developed for SARS-COV-1?

[bagster]

Brilliantly conceived by someone of superior intelligence no doubt.

Pics, or it didn't happen.

You invented 'Qtard' like I invented mama jokes.

I, on the other hand, have invented many wonderful internet colloquialisms.

Derp State, LOL, up your nose with a rubber hose, and many, many others. For a complete list, go to my blog so I can get clicks and money from you, my personal click farm.

The Internet Inventions of Bagster (with forward by ManBearPig):

Read more at excerpt

[David Chase]

It’s is censorship.

Removing someone because you don’t agree with them or you don’t like what they say is indeed censorship.

You can candy coat it all you want. But in the 21st century, you want me censored because you disagree with me and don’t like what I say.

And who asked you anyway? You’re the one that’s sticking your keyboard into a conversation that had nothing to do with you.

I was not speaking with you or mentioned your name.
Is that Trolling?

[M Kehoe]

Bttt.

5.56mm

[MHGinTN]

Hear here!

[humblegunner]

You invented 'Qtard' like I invented mama jokes.

I guess you must've then, because Qtard was merely
the logical continuation of a previous gem, "Birftard".

Consider yourself privileged to be, even briefly, graced by such brilliance.

[ransomnote]

I don’t know.

The 2005 patented mRNA technology was originally targeting vaccines for HIV and Hep C and another Corona Virus. Since 2005, they’ve never succeeded in making an mRNA vaccine that worked, that’s why there’s no Hep C or HIV vaccine. And yet, they claim to have done so for Covid in 6 months.

[bagster]

Making post or posting news links or of interest type stuff and reading people’s reactions and comments is not the definition of a Troll. It’s what FreeRepublic is. It’s what we do here.

One might think so, but let's check under the hood.

The ACTUAL definition of trolling is as I said. I know from having been on the scene when the word first came into vogue.

It was used to to describe someone who delighted in KNOWINGLY posting a comment(s) to a group that was intended to get NEGATIVE AND/OR ANGRY REPONSE and disrupt the thread.

You have a known history of making disparaging and insulting comments about Q and its adherents both on the Q thread and her beyond the trees (and probly to your mama at the dinner table, but we cannot know for sure).

You post your latest Flynn thread, which casts a negative light on the Q movement (in your mind) and sit back smiling, waiting for the 'reaction'.

When its pointed out that you're trolling (again) you put up your hands innocently and say, 'who, me?'. And now you're the victim.

Oldest trick in the book, slick.

I prefer an honest a-hole like the others here beyond the trees who don't fake innocence and play the victim. I can at least respect that.

#ActualTroll

[David Chase]

When I pen my biography, you’re going to be my proof reader.

[David Chase]

According to my FitBit.......this convo is cutting into my much needed nap.

Because I don’t really mind getting poked, flicked or slighted by you as much as others.

Gentleman to Gentleman, I’ll let you have this one.

Have a good day.
And remember,
Trust David Chase.

[grey_whiskers]

Your posts ARE the classic definition of trolling -- posting something inflammatory as bait.

Your inflammatory remarks were deliberately misrepresenting what the OP had said

1) by taking a quote out of context of the thread

1) by omitting most of what they had said in the thread

2) by then implying they'd never given any support and were pulling accusations randomly out of their ass

Yeah, that's trolling. Your attempt at DARVO will fail. Because we know your kind of Troll. Sod off.

[grey_whiskers]

Pen whose biography? A biography of oneself, would be called an autobiography (q.v.)