Suppressed Information About the Covid-19 Vaccine' | Vol 01 Date: 03/20/2021

MARCH 20, 2021 | Vanity, also collection of others' content

[FreedomPoster]

You may like some of the links in my prior post.

[truthluva]

mark

[liberalh8ter]

Thank you very much, ransomnote!

[RightField]

ping

[Iscool]

I have no position on the veracity of this report but found it fascinating and a little scary and may be relevant to this conversation...

Click Here...

[sneakers]

Thank you for posting. Last November, I was in a meeting with several people in my office who both came down with Covid within a few days after. I sat right next to one of them. I never got sick. Not even a sniffle. Mr sneakers and I have been taking 5000 IU’s of Vitamin D3 for months before that, also zinc, vitamin C and other supplements. Neither of us has gotten sick at all - and we are both in our 60’s. We’ll take our chances and NOT get the ‘vaccine’.

[Chuckster]

Thank you

[little jeremiah]

Massive info thread if you haven’t seen it yet.

[ransomnote]

GAHHH!!!!
RUN!
RUN AWAYYYYYYY!!!!!!!!!!

Re Forum Article: People Now Dying Following the Experimental Johnson and Johnson COVID Injections

The link to the original article is already dead! FR thread link below. Here's an excerpt

"So by getting the FDA to issue an EUA, which they did on February 27th, Johnson and Johnson can now test their experimental vaccine on the public as part of their Phase 3 trials. "

I was going to go back and find the Internet site with the quote by a doctor who held the personal opinion that this "vaccine" poses a also risk to people who are not vaccinated, partly because it includes the adenovirus.

From the article (below)
"The Johnson and Johnson experimental COVID “vaccine” is an “adenovirus” vaccine, and like the experimental mRNA “vaccines” from Pfizer and Moderna, there are currently no approved adenovirus vaccines in the market, although the military has used experimental adenovirus vaccines that are not FDA approved. "

The following post may indicate part of the reason the doctor feared it could harm the non-vaccinated - the adenovirus is airbornne?

---

To: Red Badger

About 5 or 6 years ago, I took a friend to the doctor’s office and was careful not to touch a single thing in the facility. I was there for just a few moments while I walked him in and went back out to my car to wait for him to be finished. Within 4 days, I developed pink eye and a Severe respiratory infection that required me to seek urgent care medical treatment. I was diagnosed as having adenovirus and was unable to function in any capacity. If I attempted to stand, I would almost collapse and would have to immediately lay on the ground to avoid injuring myself from collapsing. I was bedridden about 5 or 6 days and it took me about two weeks to regain strength to where I was drive myself and take care of myself. When I was at the Urgent Care, I mentioned to my doctor that the medical facility was the only place I had been in over a week and she told me that it was an Airborne virus. Quite terrifying considering how sick I was. My friend’s husband didn’t catch it at all.

10 posted on 3/26/2021, 6:50:49 AM by Cowgirl of Justice

---

 That physician identified the areas of concern many of us had regarding the other vaccines, but when he discussed this one, he urged people to call anyone they know (use connections to elevate this urgent risk, stop the administration) because choosing not to get it doesn't protect you from it.

Here's the thread on FR:

People Now Dying Following the Experimental Johnson and Johnson COVID Injections
https://healthimpactnews.com ^ | March 22, 2021 | by Brian Shilhavy

Posted on 3/26/2021, 6:10:32 AM by Red Badger

About 5 or 6 years ago, I took a friend to the doctor’s office and was careful not to touch a single thing in the facility. I was there for just a few moments while I walked him in and went back out to my car to wait for him to be finished. Within 4 days, I developed pink eye and a Severe respiratory infection that required me to seek urgent care medical treatment. I was diagnosed as having adenovirus and was unable to function in any capacity. If I attempted to stand, I would almost collapse and would have to immediately lay on the ground to avoid injuring myself from collapsing. I was bedridden about 5 or 6 days and it took me about two weeks to regain strength to where I was drive myself and take care of myself. When I was at the Urgent Care, I mentioned to my doctor that the medical facility was the only place I had been in over a week and she told me that it was an Airborne virus. Quite terrifying considering how sick I was. My friend’s husband didn’t catch it at all.

[ransomnote]

I don’t know.

The 2005 patented mRNA technology was originally targeting vaccines for HIV and Hep C and another Corona Virus. Since 2005, they’ve never succeeded in making an mRNA vaccine that worked, that’s why there’s no Hep C or HIV vaccine. And yet, they claim to have done so for Covid in 6 months.

[FroedrickVonFreepenstein]

bookmark

[Slyfox]

[trebb]

Thanks for a truly useful post - and the work it took to compile it.

I did some searching to see what “they” said about gene therapy and they claim the evil brews they call “vaccines” are not gene therapy because the “usually” entail replacing faulty genes with “better” ones - to me, screwing with your genes to tell them to react to something they’ve never been stimulated with is enough to cause alarm.

Ever notice that so many of the new “therapies” entail a end of message, low volume, fast talking warning that, “Your immune system may decide to tell your body to kill itself sometime down the road - even way after you stopped taking the therapy”. And that’s for treatments that don’t mess with your RNA as deeply as the current “treatments”

Thanks again.

[WildHighlander57]

If word gets out widespread, that the covid shots are not vaccines, then the immunity from lawsuits over vaccine damages is then invalidated.

That’s why they don’t want information to get out; they stand to lose a lot of money from people suing for damages.

[PGalt]

Thanks ‘note; all. Noted and passed on to family.

[ransomnote]

One-Third of Deaths Reported to CDC After COVID Vaccines Occurred Within 48 Hours of Vaccination
childrenshealthdefense.org ^ | 02/19/21 | Children's Health Defense Team

Posted on 3/27/2021, 3:43:32 PM by ransomnote

Updated VAERS records For Covid Vaccinations as of 3/26/2021

https://i.imgur.com/JFyWQZf.png

[ransomnote]

ransomnote: below is text of a long exchange which might be of use to those wondering about 'causal' versus reported data in VAERS. Note that VAERS data entry is voluntary, not required by law.

 

To: 2aProtectsTheRest

VAERS reports only mean that something happened at some point after the person got vaccinated. Grampa is 98 with a history of heart conditions and dies of a heart attack a week and a half after getting a vaccine? It goes into VAERS - by law.

Here’s some quotes from the HHS Guide to Interpreting Data in VAERS:

“When evaluating data from VAERS, it is important to note that for any reported event, no cause-and-effect relationship has been established.”

“VAERS collects data on any adverse event following vaccination, be it coincidental or truly caused by a vaccine. The report of an adverse event to VAERS is not documentation that a vaccine caused the event.”

“VAERS reports can be submitted voluntarily by anyone, including healthcare providers, patients, or family members. Reports vary in quality and completeness. They often lack details and sometimes can have information that contains errors.”

“A report to VAERS generally does not prove that the identified vaccine(s) caused the adverse event described.”

“No proof that the event was caused by the vaccine is required in order for VAERS to accept the report.”

https://vaers.hhs.gov/data/dataguide.html

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

ransomnote: There's also no proof that the event was NOT caused by the vaccine, because no experimental gene therapy rushed to market in 6 months without sufficient testing or FDA approval could possibly have enough evidence to prove anything.

 

That's why they are rushing to get as many 'shots' in arms as possible before someone halts this awful travesty.

Causal data takes years to accumulate (est. 10 years  of blood, urine, and other bio assessments, extensive human trials to determine long term impacts, etc.). So essentially you are arguing the fact that the mRNA Covid 'vaccines' are not FDA approved, little understood, and insufficiently tested renders them free from any legitimate concern no matter how many people die daily.

Using VAERS event data, 1985 deaths have been reported since adminstration began December 14, 2020. A total of 103 days have elapsed during the administration of the vaccine. Based only on observations recorded in VAERS, an average of 19 deaths per day have been reporte for Covid in VAERS during the entire administration of the Covid 'vaccine' in the U.S.

But since the rule-of-thumb for VAERS data is that only 10% of total events are reported, there has likely been 19,850 actual deaths during this time period which is an average 190 people per day.

But according to  your 'logic', it doesn't matter if 500,000 deaths were reported to VAERS for the COVID vaccine for this time period, which would be a daily average of 4,854.

There would be no proof that the COVID vaccine is NOT responsible for this fantastically exaggerated average number of deaths per day, just as there would be no proof that it is responsible for them. This is why it disgusts me to see you blanket every conversation and thread with your 'talking points'. You intentionally assert a burden of proof based on data you know will be unavailable for 10 years or more.  

If the CDC had wanted to, it could have mandated that the doctor or coroner confirming the death of a patient be required to record it in VAERS. But that would be too much like exposing the vaccine industry's dirty game. The public would have what it needs to make an informed decision and that isn't in the best interests of people like you.

When people grasp at the only data they can find (e.g., VAERS) your kind sneers that the data means NOTHING. You are insisting the public not have a single shred of information no matter how many people collapse and die   - even if they did so within 40 seconds of having the injection, because the experimental 'vaccines' have never been sufficiently studied.

Now that I know how deeply the CDC has betrayed the public with its malevolent manipulation (e.g., withholding effective treatments while people die, lying about masks, immunity, the 'vaccines', knowing use of the  invalid PCR) I believe that the CDC would not hesitate to underreport death totals as there would be no other record of deaths available to the public to compare with. It's the kind of lie with which the CDC has become accustomed.

71 posted on 3/27/2021, 10:22:28 PM by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)

VAERS reports only mean that something happened at some point after the person got vaccinated. Grampa is 98 with a history of heart conditions and dies of a heart attack a week and a half after getting a vaccine? It goes into VAERS - by law.

Here’s some quotes from the HHS Guide to Interpreting Data in VAERS:

“When evaluating data from VAERS, it is important to note that for any reported event, no cause-and-effect relationship has been established.”

“VAERS collects data on any adverse event following vaccination, be it coincidental or truly caused by a vaccine. The report of an adverse event to VAERS is not documentation that a vaccine caused the event.”

“VAERS reports can be submitted voluntarily by anyone, including healthcare providers, patients, or family members. Reports vary in quality and completeness. They often lack details and sometimes can have information that contains errors.”

“A report to VAERS generally does not prove that the identified vaccine(s) caused the adverse event described.”

“No proof that the event was caused by the vaccine is required in order for VAERS to accept the report.”

https://vaers.hhs.gov/data/dataguide.html

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

ransomnote: There's also no proof that the event was NOT caused by the vaccine, because no experimental gene therapy rushed to market in 6 months without sufficient testing or FDA approval could possibly have enough evidence to prove anything.

 

That's why they are rushing to get as many 'shots' in arms as possible before someone halts this awful travesty.

Causal data takes years to accumulate (est. 10 years  of blood, urine, and other bio assessments, extensive human trials to determine long term impacts, etc.). So essentially you are arguing the fact that the mRNA Covid 'vaccines' are not FDA approved, little understood, and insufficiently tested renders them free from any legitimate concern no matter how many people die daily.

Using VAERS event data, 1985 deaths have been reported since adminstration began December 14, 2020. A total of 103 days have elapsed during the administration of the vaccine. Based only on observations recorded in VAERS, an average of 19 deaths per day have been reporte for Covid in VAERS during the entire administration of the Covid 'vaccine' in the U.S.

But since the rule-of-thumb for VAERS data is that only 10% of total events are reported, there has likely been 19,850 actual deaths during this time period which is an average 190 people per day.

But according to  your 'logic', it doesn't matter if 500,000 deaths were reported to VAERS for the COVID vaccine for this time period, which would be a daily average of 4,854.

There would be no proof that the COVID vaccine is NOT responsible for this fantastically exaggerated average number of deaths per day, just as there would be no proof that it is responsible for them. This is why it disgusts me to see you blanket every conversation and thread with your 'talking points'. You intentionally assert a burden of proof based on data you know will be unavailable for 10 years or more.  

If the CDC had wanted to, it could have mandated that the doctor or coroner confirming the death of a patient be required to record it in VAERS. But that would be too much like exposing the vaccine industry's dirty game. The public would have what it needs to make an informed decision and that isn't in the best interests of people like you.

When people grasp at the only data they can find (e.g., VAERS) your kind sneers that the data means NOTHING. You are insisting the public not have a single shred of information no matter how many people collapse and die   - even if they did so within 40 seconds of having the injection, because the experimental 'vaccines' have never been sufficiently studied.

Now that I know how deeply the CDC has betrayed the public with its malevolent manipulation (e.g., withholding effective treatments while people die, lying about masks, immunity, the 'vaccines', knowing use of the  invalid PCR) I believe that the CDC would not hesitate to underreport death totals as there would be no other record of deaths available to the public to compare with. It's the kind of lie with which the CDC has become accustomed.

[ransomnote]

Thank you to the three FReepers whose posts I mushed together into one paragraph to add to my collection:
~~~~~

The mortality rate is ~.026 %. The case fatality rate varies between 1 and 4 % with the rate skewed heavily toward those over 59. https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210307/Study-analyzes-COVID-fatality-rate-using-age-and-GDP-as-proxies-for-the-quality-and-abundance-of-healthcare.aspx
“ skewed heavily toward those over 59.
Who are obese
Who use zinc depleting medications
Who have insufficient vitamin D levels
Who are frail
Who were killed by Cuomo or Witmer or Wolfe
“Who use zinc depleting medications”
Dang, I looked up those medications, it is a lengthy list. In my case, Flonase / Rinocourt alergy inhaler. Simple chewable antacids, and diuretic hydroclorothiazide. The first two I can avoid. Not the last as it is part of my blood pressure regiment. I’m taking 5000mg of zinc picolinate a day, might up that every other day to 10,000mg
https://www.stlukes-stl.com/health-content/medicine/33/000728.htm

[Fractal Trader]

There are many studies that show that low levels on Vitamin D have strong negative correlations with COVID deaths. In fact researchers report that the prevalence of severe vitamin D deficiency (defined as 25(OH)D less than 25 nmol/L) STRONGLY AND NEGATIVELY CORRELATED with the COVID-19 death rate per million people.

Source:

More evidence on vitamin D deficiency and death rates from COVID-19

Given that many Americans are so vitamin-depleted THAT THEY SUFFER FROM SCURVY, you can imagine that there are lots of excellent targets for COVID cases and deaths.

[ransomnote]

WHO: No ‘strong enough’ data to advocate Ivermectin use vs COVID-19

3/31/2021, 8:16:26 AM · 30 of 31
Jane Long to dynoman; ransomnote

Thanks. Great link! From your link....

Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies