|
Posted on 02/07/2021 7:41:19 PM PST by ransomnote
Q is the result of the sacrifices and commitment of countless patriots to win back our captured country from the Deep State and achieve the transformation President Trump promised in this campaign video. President Trump has said the awakening of the public is key to this transformation.
Q describes this awakening as follows:
"The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding 'mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!" ~ Q (#3038)
The video, Qanon is 100% coming from the Trump Administration, is just one of many excellent responses to the all-important question, "Whom does Q serve?"
Q Boot Camp is a quick, condensed way to learn the background and basics about the Q movement.
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
In the battle between those who strip us our constitutional rights, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger by diligently seeking the truth, independence and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
We’ll have to see what evidence Trump’s lawyers present. I assume the edited video presented that I’ve read about is the Dem’s evidence.
So, johnhereto”help” says that Trump’s lawyer with the initials V.D.V was offered a bench, which I assume a judge position, to subvert Trump?
mark
V.D.V. must be Michael T. van der Veen, he sued Trump last year.
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2021/02/donald-trump-michael-van-der-veen-impeachment
Most citizens haven’t a clue about how to run for office. It isn’t taught in school and those who are in office don’t want the competition.
Yes; a cabal whose master is globalism and the destruction of the United States as a super power - reduced to the run-of-the-mill banana republic.
It has been made clear how the large number of our representatives have been lining their pockets so that they will be protected when America falls into an abyss.
With Bitem's multi trillion dollar spending - and our present approximately $30 trillion national debt - it should be clear that the plan is almost surely to remove the dollar as the world's reserve currency and let it collapse to banana republic levels.
The chaos in the streets last year will be a picnic compared to what will occur if the dollar collapses.
While Donald Trump was not pictured as a conservative, I believe that he justified some of his excessive spending - like CoViD relief - by pointing to his exploding economy. Now his {our} enemies will likely take advantage of that excess to achieve their traitorous ends. They have already badly damaged the backbone of our economy - small business - while fabulously enriching the large global enterprises. The $15 dollar minimum wage should fairly quickly finish off most remaining small businesses, and further seriously wound the economy.
The state's response to such disaster? universal standard individual income.
ThanQ for something cool!
TXnMA
Posted on 2/10/2021, 12:43:20 PM by delta7
The CDC has admitted that between 1955–1963 over 98 million Americans received one or more doses of a polio shot which was contaminated with a cancer-causing virus called Simian vacuolating virus 40 (SV40). The CDC quickly took down the page, along with Google, but the site was luckily cached and saved to symbolize this grand admission...
Myth
So, not one of Trump’s current attorneys, good! Thanks for additional.
Where does the Constitution say that?
bkmk for later
Once you can see them, (have them in your browser's "cache" memory) you may be able to see them when you go back to my post #390...
TXnMA
It comprises a huge chunk of our overall employment, although that is obviously diminishing.
Yes, I will claim the error as mine, although I am not sure that the Time article did not intend the ambiguity. Still, the member of the National Council on Election Integrity is definitely Admiral Rogers.
Thank you, if I have time I’ll post it!
Thank you - I’m sure the Times article wanted ambiguity. One of the big methods of the cabal is to instill doubt in Trump and that includes anyone working with or for him.
Yes, that is a Republican conspiracy theory.
The true backbone of our economy is the government through employment and largesse.
More at links:
Sheriffs have constitutional power not to enforce coronavirus mandates
For example, after sheriffs in four New York counties recently announced that they won’t be enforcing Governor Andrew Cuomo’s limits on Thanksgiving gatherings because doing so exceeded their jurisdiction — not to mention being constitutionally questionable — Cuomo accused them of violating their constitutional duty; calling them “dictators” for not obeying his command. Additionally, he declared that the government has every right to control what happens within the home:
“This is an emotional time, political time. Everybody has their own strongly held opinion. Right. You have a strongly held opinion that says, ‘COVID is all an overreaction. It’s a hoax. I’m not wearing a mask. I’m not following these rules.’ You have sheriffs upstate who have said, ‘I’m not going to enforce the law.’
“I believe that law enforcement officer violates his or her constitutional duty. I don’t consider them a law enforcement officer. Because you don’t have the right to pick laws that you think you will enforce, and you don’t enforce laws that you don’t agree with. Right. That’s not a law enforcement officer. That’s a dictator.
“Laws apply in your home. Domestic violence applies in your home. Drug laws apply in your home. Yes, it does.”
Putting aside the irony of a dictatorial governor accusing those who refuse to heed his dictates of being dictators, Cuomo is wrong. In fact, he’s constitutionally wrong.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Sheriffs, States and the Supreme Court
https://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/02/03/sheriffs-states-and-the-supreme-court/
I believe some sheriffs have been inspired to stand on moral grounds by the ruling in the Supreme Court case Printz v. U.S. from 1997 that protected state officers from a federal law that attempted to mandate Brady bill participation. Scalia’s summary states:
JAY PRINTZ, SHERIFF/CORONER, RAVALLI COUNTY, MONTANA, PETITIONER 95-1478 v. UNITED STATES RICHARD MACK, PETITIONER 95-1503
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/95-1478.ZO.html
“We held in New York that Congress cannot compel the States to enact or enforce a federal regulatory program. Today we hold that Congress cannot circumvent that prohibition by conscripting the State’s officers directly. The Federal Government may neither issue directives requiring the States to address particular problems, nor command the States’ officers, or those of their political subdivisions, to administer or enforce a federal regulatory program. It matters not whether policymaking is involved, and no case by case weighing of the burdens or benefits is necessary; such commands are fundamentally incompatible with our constitutional system of dual sovereignty. Accordingly, the judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is reversed. It is so ordered.”
In this ruling, sheriffs can find comfort in a federal opinion that supports their power to reject, at their discretion, the enforcement of a federal law and the legal cover it provides. While this ruling prohibits federal legislation from commandeering state officers, it is important to note that Sheriffs do not require permission from a federal court to say “no” to enforcing unconstitutional laws. In the same way states do not require federal permission to nullify unconstitutional laws.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
