Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ransomnote
I will post a thread now in the forum and below it, a post on another thread that may or may not be related:

Rutgers researcher who created first COVID saliva test dead at 51

2/2/2021, 10:59:49 AM · by EBH · 9 replies
New York Post ^ | 02/01/2021 | Natalie Musemed
 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1/31/2021, 7:09:21 PM · 4,779 of 4,780
ransomnote to Ymani Cricket

Awhile back, a nurse (video on bitchute) was interviewed regarding covid nasal swabbing. She said there was no need to use nasal swabs as the virus was present in the mouth - mouth swabs easily detect it.

She showed a diagram of the nasal cavity that is swabbed and pointed out that it’s basically a firewall, with a sensitive portion of the brain separated from the nasal cavity with a membrane which is swabbed for the virus.

She thinks they were applying “something”. At the time I was still incredulous that the CDC produced millions of masks contaminated with Covid-19 at the start of the Planned Demic because they didn’t follow their own protocols (e.g., they had an open container of Covid-19 in the same room where the masks were being assembled).

Personally, I doubt a nationally recognized health service with decades of experience could make a mistake that even high school science class students would likely avoid. I think some/infiltrators at the CDC tainted the masks to spread the planned demic.

I don’t believe the CDC published these painful signs of incompetence (I say malevolence) willingly. I think a 3rd party (*cough* Trump Administration *cough*) knew what they were up to and tested them, then made the CDC report it’s failures. Otherwise the CDC would have blamed some supplier for the delay in the masks at the very start of the Plannedemic.

SO when I heard the nurse say there’s no need - and she did say she wondered if they were depositing substance active to brain matter - I thought they may have “accidentally” on purpose tainted the swabs. Or the swabs were tainted elsewhere. With Covid, something else, or both.

That may explain why nursing homes say their facilities have little to know Covid-19 until their patients are tested.

Regardless, there’s no need to swab the nasal cavity.

So when I read about China’s anal swab, I recall reading that the membranes of the anus are actually quite thin and susceptible to disease contagion - hence the marked acquisition of AIDS virus among those who practice anal sex.

The virus can be detected in mouth swabs like other similar viruses. China’s anal swabs are likely to to spread Covid or deposit other illnesses not otherwise contagious (e.g., there’s an illness that has symptoms that resembles Covid and it’s bacterial), or they are applying other chemical or nanobot substances.

Perhaps there is some “population management” reason why China is enforcing anal swabs, or the rates of successfully transmitting infection via nasal swabbing were too low?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Adding a note of my own here: Perhaps it's just good practice to use the peroxide regime after getting tested just in case there is accidentai or intentional contamination of swabs?


685 posted on 02/02/2021 11:39:35 AM PST by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 678 | View Replies ]


To: ransomnote

Perhaps it’s just good practice to use the peroxide regime after getting tested just in case there is accidentai or intentional contamination of swabs?


I’ve wondered the same about colloidal silver. If I’ve been in contact with a person who’s got a cold, I gargle with it, and also have some in a spray bottle which I’ll occasionally “snort” some of. (I haven’t gotten sick in a good long time - decades, with the exception of a cold that lasted about 12-16 hours.)


710 posted on 02/02/2021 12:00:20 PM PST by 17strings (If you've posted a good meme or cat .gif, chances are I've stolen it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 685 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote
"Adding a note of my own here: Perhaps it's just good practice to use the peroxide regime after getting tested just in case there is accidentai or intentional contamination of swabs?"

Maybe even do a before and after regime.

At least there would be a starting chance to kill whatever the swab is contaminated with. The after dose would finish the job.

Wonder what the tests would show. Likely they'll say there a new strain which causes saliva to become H2O2.

745 posted on 02/02/2021 12:40:25 PM PST by 1_Rain_Drop ("There will be a smooth transition to a second Trump administration” - Pompeo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 685 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson