While they were not in a court case (they were’nt were they?) destruction of evidence would seem to be evidence of guilty behavior. Sad that the CDC would be covering for the firms they are supposed to regulate.
While they were not in a court case (they were’nt were they?) destruction of evidence would seem to be evidence of guilty behavior. Sad that the CDC would be covering for the firms they are supposed to regulate.
***********************************************************************************
I am not sure whether they were at that time. I do know that people collected from the Federal injury fund, but not for MMR causing Autism. The lawyers quickly learned that was going to be denied in the Administrative hearings. Hence they would structure their case to avoid that language.
And searching to find anything about vaccinations generally yields studies with positive results. You have to really search to find the negative ones —at least that’s how it was back when I was researching the issue for various vaccines.
I also found studies that were quoted as being positive, but when looking at them, the data actually didn’t support the positive conclusion.
The disturbing thing to me is that the manufacturers have no liability. The FOIA filed by RFK Jr. showed that HHS had no data to show that the vaccines were safe-and HHS was the department that was supposed to be testing them.
So who knows what unscrupulous people may or may not do? And then we find out that a lot of our Meds come from China? Who thinks that is a good idea?