Posted on 01/20/2021 9:04:34 PM PST by weston
Dem politicians definitely know how to fight dirty.
Lin sliced and diced with expert finesse.
Unfortunately, there are some (on the Sandman thread) who are still insisting that he, and Sidney, are both Dem plants.
Geez.
I’m with one of the repliers.....STILL WON’T watch Fox.
😎
Sorry Fox. Won’t work, at least with me.
The Senate and the House actually have NO STANDING in this matter. Trials of private citizens are the province of the judicial branch ONLY.
Agree, 100%....but, who is stopping them from continuing with this charade?
👍👍
I wonder where Disclose.tv saw anything posted by PDJT, using that new logo?
Dems are controlled by the spirit of anti-Christ. Fighting dirty, as in lying, cheating, stealing, killing and every other vile and heinous trait comes naturally to them.
This is why the right (Christians/conservatives) are always on defense. They just don’t think the same way, and are always blindsided.
sweet.
He lets her talk for a long time (slandering him) before letting her know he is on the call
I don’t bother leaving this thread, it is the least “trolled” thread on FR. There is a concentrated effort (as you know) to discredit anyone bringing truth, and it is happening across all conservative forums and social media.
Those over the target get the most flack.
The ear hair looks like it may be tipped so could be Maine Coon. My cat that passed a few years ago was 25 pound Maine Coon.
The cat I have now looks more like a Norwegian forest cat.
Glad you liked it. I can eat that with sourdough bread until I bust.
Hahaha when I first started reading “the ear hair looks like it may be tipped” I thought you were writing something about the new fake president lol. I got a quick mental vision of his ear hair being dark or something. It gave me fleeting nausea.
“Dem politicians definitely know how to fight dirty.”
These weren’t solely Dem politicians as the DOJ, FBI, and other alphabet agencies have many so-called Republicans in them. It’s going to be hard, but we refer to “Dems” as they’re the only bad guys. There must be another word or phrase (Deep State?) to use instead. So the group is Dem politicians, alphabet agencies, and RINOs. It is one entity.
I think “swamp” works fairly well. Political elite? Establishment rulers? Washington overlords?
One thing that I noticed in that call is the attitude of these “students” is disturbing. It was all about their feelings and the propaganda they have been fed, they did not want to listen to facts.
With the lack of critical thinking skills and agenda driven bias allowed in these law schools, it is any wonder we cannot get a judge to even hear these cases?
I wonder if justice in the judicial system in America is on its last legs.
It is not clear from the reporting if Roberts refused, or was not asked. In either case, as I previously wrote, Impeachment Problem? Chief Justice Roberts May Not Have Constitutional Authority To Preside At Trial Of FORMER President:
Here is the wording of Article 1, Section 3, provides (emphasis added):
The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present.
Assuming an ex-President can be tried as if “the President” for impeachment purposes, then the Constitution requires that “the Chief Justice shall preside.” ….
Will Roberts preside? If he does, he needs to address this constitutional issue. After all, he is Mr. Nitpicky on not expanding the role of Supreme Court Justices.
If Roberts refuses to preside over the trial of an ex-President as beyond the Chief Justice’s jurisdiction under the Constitution — as he should — then that will render the “impeachment” trial not an “impeachment” trial at all.
If the news reports are true, and Roberts will not preside, then it is not a legitimate presidential impeachment trial. You can’t have it both ways, saying the former President can be tried as if he’s the President, but then have a constitutionally-authorized trial without the Chief Justice presiding. Sure, Democrats can have a trial, but it’s not a legitimate “impeachment” trial.
Right. “Swamp” is perfect.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.