Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 01/20/21 Vol.328, Q Day 1181
qalerts.app ^ | 1/20/2021 | FReeQs, FReepers, vanity

Posted on 01/20/2021 8:06:57 AM PST by ransomnote


 

Q is the result of the sacrifices and commitment of countless patriots to win back our captured country from the Deep State and achieve the transformation President Trump promised in this campaign video. President Trump has said the awakening of the public is key to this transformation.

Q describes this awakening as follows: 

"The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding 'mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).

When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable. 

When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’. 

"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma. 

When you are awake, you are able to clearly see. 

The choice is yours, and yours alone. 

Trust and put faith in yourself. 

You are not alone and you are not in the minority. 

Difficult truths will soon see the light of day. 

WWG1WGA!!!" ~ Q (#3038)

 

The video, Qanon is 100% coming from the Trump Administration, is just one of many excellent responses to the all-important question, "Whom does Q serve?"

Q Boot Camp is a quick, condensed way to learn the background and basics about the Q movement. 

Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see. 

In the battle between those who strip us our constitutional rights, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger by diligently seeking the truth, independence and freedom of thought.

Where We Go 1, We Go All





TOPICS: Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: 000trollstoldyou; 00toldyou; 0nothingwillstop; 1weeweedup; 1whatscoming; 3abidenpresidency; 4theyarentgullible; 5theywanteddjtgone; bagsbannedagain; bidenlovesq; ccppsyop; chinalarp; chinalovesq; codemonkeyq; comedycentral; deepstatelovesq; fake; forecastisstormfree; idiots; maga; masspsychosis; nohelptotrump; nopardonforsnowden; nopardonsforassange; nuts; propaganda; q; qanon; qgaslighting4soros; qisevil; qplancomplete; qplansuccess; qtards; qtardsarerevolting; qwasthebluepill; ransomenoteisaloser; ransomnoteisanidiot; scumbagidiots; stopthegaslighting; stormfizzled; tinfoilwonderland; tools; trump; trumpfailedus; trumpisalosersoareq; trustbarr; trustoperation; trustsessions; usefulretards; vikingkitties; youhavetobekiddingme; zot; zotqthreads
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 4,721-4,7404,741-4,7604,761-4,7804,781 next last
To: little jeremiah

“I’m curious - this is your third day on FR and your second comment. This is very cheering, if true. Without any history here, there is no way to know if this is factual or not. Did you sign up on FR specially to pass this bit of info on?”

As I said to ransomnote in my first post, I have been lurking on FR for over 13 years back to when Barry Soetoro was running for the WH in 2007. I have been following Q posts almost from the beginning and found the Q threads on FR shortly thereafter and have found the researchers here to be about the best at finding real and true information. I am a voracious consumer of the news but triangulate what I read and listen to on talk radio so I can formulate what I believe to be the truth.

We live in a community of retired professional and military people. There are over 100 retired military officers up to Generals and Admirals. As I said, my old friend is retired military intelligence. I keep my powder dry in the community by not talking about politics or religion. When he brought up Q at dinner the other night, that opened up a very insightful dialogue in which I felt needed to be share on the Q threads.

And btw, when I read the threads, there are just a few posters I look for as “must reads”. You are one those “must reads” based on the valuable insights you share.


4,761 posted on 01/24/2021 1:25:18 PM PST by reps
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4133 | View Replies]

To: Chuckster

“Welcome aboard reps.
BTW, Good news or not, you do understand how much credibility and respect those of us who have been here 20 years give people with a sign-up date of 2021-01-20 don’t you?

I hope you will forgive those of us who give you the “Side eye” for a while until you have established your cred and earned your PFC stripe.”

Thanks for the welcoming words, Chuckster!

I have been a 13 year lurker back to when Soetoro was running the first time for the WH but I felt I had to get in the game.

I look forward to reading your insights going forward!


4,762 posted on 01/24/2021 1:25:18 PM PST by reps
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4268 | View Replies]

To: BlessedBeGod

BlessedBeGod said: B.S.

Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them. MATT 7:20


4,763 posted on 01/24/2021 1:25:18 PM PST by reps
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4595 | View Replies]

To: cherry

“I hope what you related is true, no exageration....”

Who knows if anything that any of us post is true...much of it is speculation. The truth reveals itself in it’s own time and way. I found what he was telling me did line up with the “truth” I have come to know. I found it hopeful and felt it needed to be shared.


4,764 posted on 01/24/2021 1:25:18 PM PST by reps
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4160 | View Replies]

To: nanetteclaret

The Q clearance is the United States Department of Energy (DOE) security clearance required to access Top Secret Restricted Data, Formerly Restricted Data, and National Security Information, as well as Secret Restricted Data. Restricted Data (RD) is defined in the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 and covers nuclear weapons and related materials.

Many people have (Like all DOE weapons lab personnel) or have had that clearance.


4,765 posted on 01/24/2021 1:31:04 PM PST by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4206 | View Replies]

To: reps

Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them. MATT 7:20

Yep, and I sure know you.

4,766 posted on 01/24/2021 1:40:39 PM PST by BlessedBeGod (~~To restore all things in Christ~~Appeasing evil is cowardice~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4763 | View Replies]

To: Aurorales

See 4683


4,767 posted on 01/24/2021 2:01:40 PM PST by Aurorales (I will not be ridiculed into silence!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4683 | View Replies]

To: bagster
***At least we don't have to worry about China anymore, right?***

😉Excellent point! No more China --> Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia

Who were those Uighars?

4,768 posted on 01/24/2021 2:02:32 PM PST by Bob Ireland (The Democrap Party is the enemy of freedom.They use all the seductions and deceits of the Bolshevics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4756 | View Replies]

To: reps

Thank you very much for your reply, much appreciated.


4,769 posted on 01/24/2021 2:12:44 PM PST by little jeremiah (Thirst for truth is the most valuable possession and no one can take it away from you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4761 | View Replies]

To: norsky; bitt; ransomnote; little jeremiah
Sidney Powell launches Super PAC to ‘fight vigorously for our constitutional rights’

Attorney Sidney Powell has launched a Super PAC dedicated to a range of aims, including freedom of speech, Constitutional rights, and “the sacred right of free and fair elections.”

In a statement on Saturday, Powell announced the launch of the Restore the Republic Super PAC, which is an independent expenditure-only political action committee that may receive unlimited contributions and may engage in unlimited political spending on initiatives, provided it does not coordinate directly with campaigns or candidates.

This could be part of something that I have been working on.

4,770 posted on 01/24/2021 2:22:48 PM PST by Bob Ireland (The Democrap Party is the enemy of freedom.They use all the seductions and deceits of the Bolshevics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4760 | View Replies]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel

Not offended at all. Just sharing information that you can take or leave.


4,771 posted on 01/24/2021 4:23:42 PM PST by reps
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4758 | View Replies]

To: SaxxonWoods

I believe it is important.
You’re ok with frauds parading as the real deal??


4,772 posted on 01/24/2021 6:47:23 PM PST by AllAmericanGirl44 (“The truth does not change according to our ability to stomach it”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3654 | View Replies]

To: rx

4,773 posted on 01/24/2021 9:30:55 PM PST by generally ( Don't be stupid. We have politicians for that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4749 | View Replies]

.


4,774 posted on 01/25/2021 12:22:12 AM PST by AllAmericanGirl44 (“The truth does not change according to our ability to stomach it”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3952 | View Replies]

To: BlessedBeGod

Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them. MATT 7:20
Yep, and I sure know you.

You think so...as a believer, one should walk the walk and talk the talk. I am certain Christ wouldn’t use vulgarity in calling someone a liar!


4,775 posted on 01/25/2021 12:27:47 AM PST by reps
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4766 | View Replies]

To: Ymani Cricket

What former president/ Newly opened Office of the Former President.


4,776 posted on 01/26/2021 6:12:43 PM PST by usual suspect
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4690 | View Replies]

I want to thank my good friend of almost 40-plus years,
the Vice President of the United States, for coming today.
I don't think there's ever been a Vice President
who is as steeped in foreign policy, as knowledgeable,
and his instincts are as honed as Vice President Joe Biden's.
And he, believe it or not, began his visits to China
as a young senator
on the first visit to meet with Deng Xiaoping in 1979.
And he has been many times since and has received
many Chinese leaders here.
I will tell you that the Vice President,
on so many different issues in the discussions that we have,
has just an inherent native sense of direction
with respect to foreign policy.
And I won't say too much more here
except to say that we who had the privilege
of working with him in the Senate --
I think I was there with him for 26 years --
saw a person whose word is good, whose instincts are sound,
and whose principles and values are just as basic
and as based in America
and in common sense as you could desire.
So, ladies and gentleman, without further ado,
the Vice President of the United States, Joe Biden.
(applause)
 
The Vice President: Vice Premier Yuan, I hope you understand
not to believe a word of what the Secretary just said.
The one thing I do know for sure,
that this strategic and economic dialogue is essential.
It's essential to get it right for both our countries.
There's no more important relationship.
State Counselor Yang, it's good to see you again.
I am honored to be with you.
I point out the State Counselor,
we've known each other for awhile.
His allocution and his mastery of English exceeds mine,
and so I seek his advice occasionally on speeches.
(laughter)
But honored to welcome your delegation to Washington.
I want to start by expressing my sadness.
The sadness, quite frankly, of the American people
in the loss of two beautiful young lives,
young Chinese students in the Asiana plane crash on Saturday.
Our sympathies to their families and to your country.
It was remarkable to see that plane in the state it was in,
but the loss of those two young lives is, for families,
the most devastating thing that happens in their lives.
 
You know, we meet at a time of transition on both sides.
China has a new president and new leaders.
I've had the great pleasure and honor of spending
a fair amount of time with President Xi
when President Hu and President Obama
thought the two Vice Presidents could --
should get to know one another.
And we ended up spending about 10 days together,
five in each of our countries, traveling around,
and you get to know someone fairly well.
When I congratulated him on his elevation,
I asked if he could possibly help me.
(laughter)
But he made no commitment whatsoever.
But all kidding aside,
we welcome and look forward to the transition
that's taking place on both sides.
 
And, Vice Premier, I want you to know that in the persons
of John Kerry and Jack Lew,
as part of the change in the guard here,
we have sent you, in this case, in this meeting,
two of the best, most seasoned, qualified public servants
that this nation has to offer, and that is not hyperbole.
They generally are.
I think Jack's had every job
in the administration in every administration,
and he sometimes in our meetings gets confused
as to whether he's supposed to be calling
for spending less money or more money
based on whether he's the director of OMB
or the Secretary of the Treasury.
But all kidding aside, we --
this transition that's taken place
in the last six months or so is important
in that I think it's vitally important that the relationships
among the four men behind me
are deepened and become more personal.
I look out and see our trade rep.
He's heard me say that there's a famous American politician,
a former Speaker of the House, Tip O'Neill, and he used to say,
"All politics is local."
Well, I think a significant part of international politics,
foreign policy, is personal.
 
Trust -- one of the most important things
that we need to continue to establish and deepen
between our peoples and between our governments is trust.
We don't have to agree on everything,
but you have to trust.
 
And I think it's -- in building these relationships,
both our countries will be much better for it
in the years ahead.
The stakes are very high because it's fair to say
that the dynamic that emerges between our nations
will affect not just our people, but, quite frankly,
have a significant impact on the entire world.
 
And let me be blunt.
There are strong voices on both sides of the Pacific that talk
about a relationship in terms of mistrust and suspicion.
They still exist in both our countries.
Our relationship is subject to all kinds of caricatures.
I've heard the U.S.-China relationship described
as everything from the next Cold War to the new G2.
And the truth is, neither are accurate.
The truth is more complicated.
Our relationship is and will continue to be, God willing,
a mix of competition and cooperation.
And competition can be good for both of us,
and cooperation is essential.
For two nations as large and influential as ours,
it's only natural that there be competition.
And if the game is fair, healthy and political
and economic competition can then marshal the best energies
of both our societies.
 
But this mix places an added burden on both of us.
The relationship -- a relationship like ours
will work only if the leaders and citizens approach it
with the sense of vision and a spirit of maturity.
We will have our disagreements.
We have them now.
But if we are straightforward, clear,
and predictable with one another,
we can find solutions that work for both of us.
I made clear on my last visit to China
that we are a Pacific power.
We have been and we're going to remain one.
That should be viewed, and one of my discussions in China
was viewed by many as a stabilizing influence.
 
But as we implement President Obama's policy of rebalancing
toward the Asia Pacific, it's important that the United States
and China communicate clearly and work closely
with one another on what is going on.
We have big issues to deal with.
We each have important contributions to make
to global and economic stability.
My country -- my country has been the last four years
grappling with such challenges as infrastructure, education,
or our fiscal picture.
 
Too many Americans still remain out of work.
But China faces serious challenges as well.
It needs to create high-skilled jobs for young people,
deal with grave environmental problems,
reform China's banking sector, respond to market forces,
and bring its shadow financial sector to heel.
The United States is making progress.
Our economy has now added private sector jobs
for 40 consecutive months.
Not enough, in the view of this administration,
but 40 consecutive months.
 
The manufacturing sector is once again growing,
growing at the fastest pace in decades,
and our deficit next year is projected to be less than half
of what it was in 2009 as a share of our economy.
And the next steps that China needs
to take for its own economy
happen to be in the interests of the United States as well.
Your own plans call for the kinds of changes
that have to take place that are difficult, like here.
But if they do, they will benefit us both,
including free exchange rates,
shifting to a consumption-led economy,
enforcing intellectual property rights and renewed innovation.
You know, it's easy for pundits to point out to us,
in both our countries, what we need to do,
but they're political realities.
These things are not easy to do quickly, but they must be done.
Some argue that China should continue on its current path,
enhancing some aspects of its free market system
while rising political openness gradually occurs,
maintaining the state's deep involvement
in the Chinese economy.
 
I do not pretend to know whether --
with any degree of certainty or precision,
what will allow China to rise above those economic challenges,
but I believe that history offers us both some lessons.
History shows that prosperity is greatest when governments allow
not just the free exchange of goods,
but the free exchange of ideas; that innovation,
which thrives in open economies and societies,
thrives in open economies and societies.
That is -- that's the currency of the 21st century's success,
that in the long run greater openness, transparency,
respect for universal rights actually is a source
of national and international stability.
As I've said before, I believe that China, presumptuous of me,
will be stronger and more stable and more innovative
if it represents and respects
international human rights norms.
But there are differences we have.
We also have significant challenges,
strategic challenges to discuss.
Together we need to be addressing
the longstanding disagreements,
and when sensitive issues arise,
work hard not to create new ones.
For example, our military is --
your military is modernizing and expanding its presence in Asia.
Ours is updating its global posture
as two wars come to an end
and we recalibrate and rebalance in Asia.
These trends will bring us into closer contact.
Leaving the military dimension
of our dialogue under-developed on both sides
causes us to run unnecessary risk.
So I welcomed yesterday the round
of strategic security dialogue and the enhanced dialogue
between our senior military leaders.
More of it must occur.
It's critical to expand
our military-to-military dialogue exchanges
in cooperation as we go forward.
We have to know what each other are doing.
The truth is, we have a common interest in defending
a wide range of public goods in international rules
that will only grow more compelling
as China looks beyond its borders.
For example, we both --
we both benefit from freedom of navigation
and uninhibited lawful commerce.
That will deepen and it will also become more apparent,
and it will depend on how China approaches its territorial
disputes with its neighbors and how we work together
to advance common interest.
We both will benefit from an open, secure, reliable internet.
Outright cyber-enabling theft that U.S. companies
are experiencing now must be viewed as out-of-bounds
and needs to stop.
The race to develop cleaner, more affordable energy sources
through a mix of competition and cooperation,
to state the obvious, can benefit both our people
and the people in the world.
So I welcome the new energy and climate dialogue
and our agreement to reduce the pollutants known as HFCs,
which make an outsized contribution to climate change.
And, of course, the security of both our nations,
as we have discussed privately and somewhat publically,
is threatened by North Korea's nuclear and missile programs.
Neither of us, neither of us will accept a North Korea
that is a nuclear-armed state.
Our presidents have agreed that ending that threat
is a critical priority, not only to our relationship --
in our relationship, but for each of our nations.
We're determined to intensify our cooperation with China
to denuclearize North Korea.
Many of the most pressing challenges
will be very difficult to solve
unless we are willing to continue to work together
as we are doing today and have been doing
for some time.
China now has the second largest economy in the world
and, God willing, will continue to grow.
It's in our interest.
It's no longer the discussion, when I was a young senator,
of zero-sum games here.
We used to talk about if another nation grows
and benefits somehow that --
it's the exact opposite, to state the obvious.
With that new -- not new,
but emerging and continuing growth of the Chinese economy
and the second largest in the world now,
that's the good news.
The bad news is,
it comes with some new international responsibilities.
It's understandable that China wants to be involved
in international rule-setting, as you should be,
but is wary about taking additional
international burdens on.
Ultimately the two go hand in hand,
because in 2013 the world's environment
and rule-based economic order
cannot sustain an exception the size of China.
Your country is simply too immense and too important.
As John pointed out, I first visited China
in 1976 as a young senator.
It was already clear then that China stood
on the cusp of remarkable change.
I believed then and I believe now that your country's rise
would be and is good for America and the world.
That is just a simple statement of fact,
but it's never been inevitable.
The greatest cause for optimism is what happens
when our people come together.
We see a lot of ourselves in each other,
a striving entrepreneurial spirit,
an optimism about the future.
I see that when I speak to young Americans across this country,
and I saw it when I was accompanied by your President
and spoke to college students in Chengdu.
Mechanisms like the strategic and economic dialogue play
an important role in managing our complex relationship.
If together we get it right,
we can leave behind a much better future for our children
and for their children --
and, quite frankly, for the world.
That sounds somewhat chauvinistic,
just be talking about,
as we get our relationship right,
it has such a consequence to the world, but it does.
It does.
And nothing matters more.
So I welcome you.
I know this is not the first day,
but I welcome you on behalf of the President,
and I wish you a great deal of luck.
We have a great deal of work to do.
The promise is real.
The competition will, in fact,
as I said to President Xi when he was Vice President,
the competition is good.
It's good for us.
It's good for you.
We welcome it. We welcome it.
And we'll both be better for it.
As I said, as a consequence, if we get it right,
so will the world.
So thank you for the important work you're doing here today.
I wish you luck for the remainder of this discussion,
and I look forward to seeing you in China.
Thank you.
Obama White House - July 10, 2013
 

4,777 posted on 01/29/2021 6:37:41 PM PST by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4776 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote
Remember it is ChinaJoe and I think bagster was right.

Warning, anal swab demonstration (on a white dummy in striped outfit) hmmm.

"NOPE - China demonstrates how to perform a COVID19 anal swab sample collection. Passengers on a flight to Beijing were taken to a hotel where they were subjected to anal swabs." China Anal swab demonstration

Just say no America.

4,778 posted on 01/31/2021 6:33:31 PM PST by Ymani Cricket ( "Pressure Makes Diamonds" ~General Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4777 | View Replies]

To: Ymani Cricket

Awhile back, a nurse (video on bitchute) was interviewed regarding covid nasal swabbing. She said there was no need to use nasal swabs as the virus was present in the mouth - mouth swabs easily detect it.

She showed a diagram of the nasal cavity that is swabbed and pointed out that it’s basically a firewall, with a sensitive portion of the brain separated from the nasal cavity with a membrane which is swabbed for the virus.

She thinks they were applying “something”. At the time I was still incredulous that the CDC produced millions of masks contaminated with Covid-19 at the start of the Planned Demic because they didn’t follow their own protocols (e.g., they had an open container of Covid-19 in the same room where the masks were being assembled).

Personally, I doubt a nationally recognized health service with decades of experience could make a mistake that even high school science class students would likely avoid. I think some/infiltrators at the CDC tainted the masks to spread the planned demic.

I don’t believe the CDC published these painful signs of incompetence (I say malevolence) willingly. I think a 3rd party (*cough* Trump Administration *cough*) knew what they were up to and tested them, then made the CDC report it’s failures. Otherwise the CDC would have blamed some supplier for the delay in the masks at the very start of the Plannedemic.

SO when I heard the nurse say there’s no need - and she did say she wondered if they were depositing substance active to brain matter - I thought they may have “accidentally” on purpose tainted the swabs. Or the swabs were tainted elsewhere. With Covid, something else, or both.

That would explain why nursing homes say their facilities have little to know Covid-19 until their patients are tested.

Regardless, there’s need to swab the nasal cavity.

So when I read about China’s anal swab, I recall reading that the membranes of the anus are actually quite thin and susceptible to disease contagion - hence the marked acquisition of AIDS virus among those who practice anal sex.

The virus is present in mouth swabs like other similar viruses. China’s anal swabs are likely to deposit other illnesses not otherwise contagious (e.g., there’s an illness that has symptoms that resembles Covid and it’s bacterial), or they are applying other chemical or nanobot substances.

There is some “population management” reason why China is enforcing anal swabs.


4,779 posted on 01/31/2021 7:09:21 PM PST by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4778 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Very interesting!


4,780 posted on 01/31/2021 9:22:13 PM PST by Ymani Cricket ( "Pressure Makes Diamonds" ~General Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4779 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 4,721-4,7404,741-4,7604,761-4,7804,781 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson