SP (note I did not use his name), was the only one who called the inauguration correctly along with the lockout ahead of time. So kindly, having hindsight in your favor, “find some other source and get back to me with the sauce”.I'm surprised you're not concerned that he intentionally lies to gain undeserved trust. He said Q called him on the phone. We saw what happened to 8ch when it was associated with Q; why are there no protests, deletions or deplatforming campaigns against this guy posting Q content on YOUTUBE.
Why would YOUTUBE allow their platform to be used this way at a time when the MSM is claiming MAGA intends to overthrow the Capitol and Pelosi wants NG to be armed with machine guns. Youtube has deleted so many patriot platforms - why would they allow one who claims direct Q comms remain?
This Brit is one of the people trying to fill the void with fake information while Q is silent.
The only other alternative is that he's incapable of discerning who he is talking to. How is that a person one should follow to "connect the dots?" He should at least know Q said "no outside comms," but he doesnt.
I've never seen anyone make the case why Q would ever chose this guy for any purpose or particular skill he posses. We do know British Intel helped frame POTUS and helped rig the election.
Q has access to many American patriots so he didn't have to "call someone on the phone" and drop intel on an unsecured line. Good thing he never told us how he authenticated Q because he'd need...identifying information to compare iti with, wouldn't he.
The DEEP STATE is desperate to keep Q silent and would kill someone stepping forward to broadcast Q content from their home, although they'd let YOUTUBE delete his channel first so we wouldn't know.
Does YOUTUBE protect free speech, particularly that of Q while the Capitol is described as a fortress and the Dems are threatening to hunt down those following Q and make them pay?
For the record, he wasn't the first to call the inauguration correctly. Whistleblower @JohnHereToHelp described the strategy we're seeing in July of 2020. Nancy Pelosi doubled down. I've mentioned it a few times.
~~~~~~~~
Here's my most recent post from Monday, but I've been talking about it now and then for months:
I haven’t been following the fire under the bridge story, but have wondered whether it was black hats or white hats who had something to do with it.
I have been thinking that the DS wants footage to air on 1/20 and they could get it by recording early, and rerecording over Joe’s many gaffs, during “dress rehearsals.” All treasonous guests could be filmed and clips of Joe speaking to the larger venue shown. Then edit the tape to try to make Joe look normal and broadcast it as “live” at the appointed time on Wednesday.
But I have my doubts - The fire started early that morning and if filming was underway at that time, lighting/shadows would likely show that the footage was not taken later in the day as planned [Our side has patriot Autists, and we aren’t afraid to use ‘em!]
I couldn’t find exactly the time the rehearsal itself was to take place - if at 1:00pm, then maybe White hats could start a fire somewhere and empty the place. I understand this is the second time “rehearsal” was canceled.
~~~~~~~
Clearly SP is compromised by his UFO crap....
~~~~~~~
He is actually compromised by everything about him. The only "positive confirmation" is his capacity to collect information from other sources on the Internet, places like Twitter and FR and he's then given credit for having insider knowledge. He's not just an unknown quantity, he's a disreputable unknown quantity lying about access to someone he can't authenticate and wouldn't talk to him if he could.
~~~~~~~
....but I might point out that you need to study SRA a bit, because that is the source for the UFO and Lizard people garbage. Rather than running screaming from it, QUESTION why such an intelligent man has such an insane issue.
~~~~~~~
We haven't fallen on such hard times that we must push insanity as a recommendation for a reliable source of Q information?
SRA is not the criteria Q would look for in a confidential source able to resist the extremes of psychological and physical pressure and threats.
There is no reason for me to wonder why he has such an insane issue when evaluating whether or not he's a reliable source of information. At face value he is not suitable in any capacity.
Frankly, Q seems to favor American patriots whom other patriots have reason to trust. Mike Flynn is a good example. Lt. General MCInernry is another. What is an otherwise unknown British father of an alien love child, with a history of lying or incapacity to test reality, compared with those patriots?
~~~~~~~
It leads to the rabbit hole to hell and back, and contains a hard won clue. So herein lies the problem. Because SP has become unpolitically correct and SRA is a key part of what is going on,
~~~~~~~
He's not "unpolitically correct" on FR. He fits within a framework that Jim Rob has previously conveyed to us (having all my Q threads removed without warning ,thread locking, pinged, admonitions) is not appropriate for FR. Given JR has repeatedly explained this to us, our insistance that we bring objectionable content into FR despite his wishes either conveys a lack of respect or our incapacity to understand and comply with rules. Why would we be allowed to remain?
You seem to be insisting that embracing a psychologically damaged liar with no inside commication is an urgent need that must be done even though it can be expected to terminate all Q threads.
~~~~~~~
you have shut down the biggest CLUE as to the top levels of this conspiracy. Also the method and motive as to why child abuse is so prevelant in the falling of Governments world wide.
~~~~~~~
That guy did not talk to Q, has no security clearance and would not be able to apply for it successfully because of his public professions of having sex with aliens and receiving calls from Q. Yet you are posing his "information" as the biggest clue to the top levels of this conspiracy.
Q gave us the biggest clues. We don't need psychologically shattered foreigners claiming unsecured comms with one or more persons he cannot possibly hope to validate to supplement the information we have been given through authenticated channels.
Many of us have labored over the painful task of understanding "method and motive" re child abuse and as you can see, other matters are more critical right now. The president has been tracking down sex traffickers and Q has given us plenty to research, others trapped in that system are giving their personal testimonies.
The only thing that the Brit could potentially supply is more of the same (SRA) if your unsubstantiated theory re SRA is true for him, but he's not saying anything about SRA. In fact he's claiming authoritative information in the absence of Q. Personally, I think only a black hat would do that.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Once we start to censor ourselves like the new free Twitter ALL IS LOST.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
"We" have always functioned under Jim Rob's house rules. Everyone follows the hosts rules on any website.
We may get to keep our thread if we follow house rules; we will NOT get to keep our threads if we refuse. It's not our place to utilize the website Jim Rob has cultivated for more than 20 years to strike a blow on behalf of our pet interests. It's his house; it's his call.
I request that you talk to Jim Robinson about your virgorous concern that "ALL IS LOST" if we comply with his rules, and that you do so without pulling our thread into contention with whatever rules he requires.
Others have demanded that Q thread participants refuse to allow mere rules to restrict our "freedom" and as many times as I ask them to take it up with management, they never do. They disrupt our threads with admonitions about "TRUTH" and "ALL IS LOST". They stand within or behind the thread and shove OTHERS around them to bend/defy the rules but I've never seen them put themselves on that line they say we should defend. Go figure.
By addressing Jim Rob directly and on your own behalf, you could change the reputation such demands have earned thus far.
Please PM Jim Robinson and say you personally have objections x, y, and z to his restrictions for FR's content and ask him to consider your point of view. He's got 20+ years tending FR and will bring vast, reliable experience to any reply he may choose to give.
Please don't involve the Q thread in your discussion with Jim Rob as we have enough trouble keeping our Q threads in the current envirnment, and Q never talked about this guy, never authenticated him, and in fact warned against people functioning exactly like him (i.e., "No outside comms").
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Because a part of the clues lead to places many are not yet able to go, yet are a critical part of what is going on.
The Great Awakening is FAR bigger than you suspect.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Given what happened this week, is your focus now on SRA as the next logical objective?
With all due respect, Q has already told us repeatedly that the Great Awakening is FAR bigger than we suspect and he wasn't thinking of Youtube Channels lying/fantasizing about aliens and unsecured comms.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This is precisely why we are relegated to the smokey backroom on Freepsville because the discussion is too much to take for those non redpilled onlookers.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Q threads have never been relegated to the smokey backroom on Freepsville. All 328 threads are in the Chat forum under the conspiracy topic
We've succeeded in building 328 threads together - why are you posing this as hurdle that will destroy us unless we change how we've been complying with house rules all this time?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
So, in the smokey backroom if you create a politically correct list of subjects there no longer is any free discussion. And you have zero chance on success on figuring this out.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I don't know if you've noticed, but we have a popularity problem on FR, and it isn't because we censor ourselves too much.
I don't see how having house rules on a website, as all websites do have, means we have ZERO chance of success figuring anything out since, as I've said, we've built over 320+ and figured out alot while doing it.
We try to pick up after ourselves because we're a large thread and don't want to burden Admins. We've complied with house rules and remain grateful that we have a home on the Internet - a rarity in these times.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
So, if I may suggest to you, taking on a Karen attitude and attacking any euphemism to the dreaded pirate does no good in protecting the sheeple because they, being new here simply do not get it.
~~~~~~~~~~~~
How does taking on a name-calling attitude and attacking people legitimately worried about the survival of our threads protect those around us? I don't think of them as "sheeple" but I do think they have reason to believe if it says "Q" on the sign out front, they should not encounter substantial amounts of compromised information from people who a) hate Q or B) falsely claim to speak for Q.
I am deeply concerned by the energy expending in pushing content onto our threads that is anti-Q or fake Q. I'm not surprised that others struggle to understand the insistance on embracing content destructive to our hope that we can keep our threads on FR.
There's already information contrary to Q's movement and the Great Awakening daily posted to our threads - there isn't a need for more to "balance" the playing field.
~~~~~~~~~~~~
However it does stiffle speech enough amongst us in the know that we also will never get it.
~~~~~~~~~~~~
Such nonsense. Who is this "we" you speak of? We have to include toxic content on Q threads against FR's wishes or "we" won't get it?
~~~~~~~~~~~~
And, the mission fails...
~~~~~~~~~~~~
Not if we refuse to descend the slippery slope with angst ridden arguments that sound like Braveheart's battle cry for "FREEDOM!!!!"
We can just treat FR and its owners with the respect they deserve and thank God in our prayers that we have been blessed with a place to post publicly. We can use the free and easy FReepmail service with which we are blessed to share content that is too sensitive or not a good fit for the Q threads or for FR's forum. We can do this with gratitude and thanks giving. It has been working for over three years now.
I've never heard a satisfactory reason why some peeps refuse to post sensitive links via FReepmail so I won't ask.
I don't believe we've held on for hundreds of threads and now the wheels must simply spring from the axels as the thread overturns and breaks through a guardrail and catches fire - all this if we don't adopt content inappropriate to FR and to the Q threads.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Why does Q teach with questions instead of answers?
Is it because he does not have the answers, or we do not not have the question?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
As this appears to be unrelated to the task of complying with house rules in order to preserve our threads, and trying save time/space for authentic Q information and analysis, I'll leave you to ponder your own question in peace.
