Yes. I think Alex Jones was Roger Stone’s assignment. Just a theory. But early on in the campaign Stone gets removed as campaign manager. Soon after, he reaches out to Jones and arranges and interview with Trump. Jones gets all pumped up and is solidly on board as a Trump supporter.
If Alex Jones is controlled opposition as Q implies, then he would need to be handled delicately, and that was likely what Stone was tasked by Trump to do. If Jones could be encouraged to maintain the act of being pro-Trump, at least for a while, then that would be good, because at the time he had a lot of followers. He still does but less than before. The best strategy would be to string Jones along, flatter him, and get him to believe that he’s trusted. Under those circumstances Jones is more than happy, for the time being, to keep the pro-Trump deception alive because he knows his role of betraying Trump isn’t needed till later.
Then suddenly out of nowhere comes Q, who begins to gain followers among Jones’ core audience (i.e. woke patriots who believe Jones to be a fellow patriot). Jones plays along for a while, tries not to discuss Q too much but then is begrudgingly forced to make some positive statements about Q. Then eventually he figures a way out. After a couple months he starts claiming that the original Q has been taken over by a different person/persons. The original Q was good, but this new Q is bad. Unfortunately for Jones, it’s not long before he realizes his ploy has failed. He watches as Q eclipses him in popularity among the woke patriot demographic. It’s not even close.
Ever since then, Jones has been stewing in anger over the way he was neutralized by the Trump and the patriots. Jones really has no remaining mission left. He’s been largely sidelined. Even though he still has his followers, he’s lost the ability to lead them away from Trump. He’s been relegated to roles like we saw on Jan. 6th. Even then his goal was rendered largely ineffective by POTUS who coopted the Stop The Steal rally and held the crowd back until the capitol break-in had already begun.
Of course it’s all just a theory, but it sounds about right to me.
On another note:
I just came across this. It may seem rather boring at first glance but is very significant
POPE FRANCIS SEIZES VATICAN BANK
January 7, 2021 By Joseph P. Farrell
"Here's the crux (not to coin a pun) of it:
Pope Francis issued a new law Monday reorganizing Vatican finances following a series of scandals.
In a document issued Dec. 28, the pope formalized the transfer of financial responsibilities from the Vatican’s Secretariat of State to the Administration of the Patrimony of the Apostolic See (APSA), which functions as the Holy See’s treasury and sovereign wealth manager.
He first announced the shake-up in an Aug. 25 letter to Vatican Secretary of State Cardinal Pietro Parolin that was made public on Nov. 5 after the Secretariat of State was engulfed by accusations of financial mismanagement.
The pope promulgated the new law in an apostolic letter issued motu proprio (“on his own impulse”).
The text, entitled “A better organization” and released in Italian, also set out new regulations for the oversight of Peter’s Pence, an annual worldwide collection supporting the pope’s mission.
In other words, Francis has moved the Vatican Bank from the Secretariat of State, normally headed by an archbishop or a cardinal archbishop, to the Administration of the Patrimony of the Apostolic See, in other words, placing the bank directly, for the first time in its chequered history, under the Pope.
To draw a somewhat clumsy analogy, this is akin to President Kennedy's National Security Action Memorandum, that removed the CIA from oversight of covert operations, and placed those operations directly under the military, i.e., directly under the chain of command ending in the Presidency. In effect, what Francis has done is to move the whole "hidden system of finance" that is the Vatican Bank, a participant in that global "hidden system" that I've speculated about for so long, and placed it directly under papal control.
It might be argued that this was the only way to deal with the bank, to gain any measure of real oversight or transparency in the institution.
But I suspect it augurs something entirely different, and far more ominous, namely, the final capture of the papacy by "the high financial cabal". And as that system moves increasingly toward more globaloney, expect the same from the Vatican and future popes. After all, Francis has made no secret he's fully on board with that agenda. And this is the biggest symbol of them all."
See you on the flip side..."
Good analysis. Sounds right to me. I also think other things were going on underfoot while Trump was speaking that also benefitted from the late ending ... /Sn.
Concur. You encapsulated what I had not put into so many words.
Well done, sir!
Jones needs to go find some new conspiracy theories. All his old ones came true.