Incidentally, an epic rant posted on Instapundit's thread.
Warning. An F-bomb or two.
Found this:
Anons, I think I see it.
POTUS speech on Thursday: Smooth, orderly and seamless transition of power”
Today: I won’t be attending the inauguration January 20th.
I believe he’s planning on handing off power toa third party military tribunal.
We may be without an elected President for a period of time.
This is why we have carriers afloat in the Pacific re Q38.
The President cannot hand off to a Chinese asset or he will break his oath of office.
I don’t believe he’l do that.
What he can do is hand off to a sort of caretaker mlitary government that wil be charged with sorting out the election and prosecuting the traitors.
He’ll be completely out of power so nobody can claim that he’s running a coup.
Incidentally, an epic rant posted on Instapundit's thread.
Warning. An F-bomb or two.
Not constitutional.
Saw this and don’t disagree except the Q38 interpretation. otherwise plausible
"First arrest will shock the world."
This thought occurred to me some months ago but it seemed so ridiculous I didn't share it: President Trump is the first to arrested. Following him all the traitors in government, military, business, etc. A massive sweep by the military to remove all those who have violated their constitutional oaths and have collaborated with our country's enemies most recently in the last national election. It will take a while but the first to be exonerated will be President Trump. It is soon revealed that PDJT is innocent of any crimes and all the rest are guilty of treason and host of lesser felonies all punishable by imprisonment of death. It will all be done in military and not civilian courts as the corruption is too deep and pervasive. I don't know by what authority the military may do this. I don't think "force" is the proper authority under our system which is based on law, or so have been led to believe my whole life.
Someone recently suggested a military junta to clean out the trash then return things to civilian control. Due to media conditioning, I associate "junta" with Latin America and it has an unsavory quality. Again, due to media conditioning. I find it interesting that the word "junta" is simply the Spanish word for “meeting." Its formal definition is a committee or administrative council that rules a country after a coup d’etat and before a legal government has been established. Spanish resistance to Napoleon’s invasion in 1808 was organized by the juntas provinciales; the national committee was the junta suprema central.
I welcome comments.
I don't know if a junta is the only way forward but whatever happens it's gonna be ugly and necessary . . . like amputating a gangrenous limb.
interesting take