Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child

Do not try to mix TOTALLY DIFFERENT functions assigned to the Vice President (VP) by the US Constitution. (USC).

One role as president of only the Senate has nothing crossing over to the much more important role of approving and tabulating electoral votes to select next president.

As I postulated before, there is a reason why the USC specifically assigns the role of tabulating electoral votes to the VP. If it was merely a role to the arithmetic to add votes, that could have been done by any of the Senate or House clerks.


120 posted on 01/07/2021 3:28:08 PM PST by entropy12 (It is NOT WHO VOTES, it is who COUNTS THE VOTES, become the rulers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]


To: entropy12
I didn't mix the different functions. I simply pointed out that the VP is treated differently than any other member of the executive branch under the U.S. Constitution.

As I postulated before, there is a reason why the USC specifically assigns the role of tabulating electoral votes to the VP. If it was merely a role to the arithmetic to add votes, that could have been done by any of the Senate or House clerks.

Or maybe there is no such thing as a "Senate or House clerk" identified in the U.S. Constitution, and if there is a need to establish a single person to serve in an oversight role then the VP makes more sense than anyone else.

As I see it, the Constitution and the 12th Amendment are written explicitly to minimize the roles of any elected official subject to legislative branch oversight in presidential elections.

125 posted on 01/07/2021 4:04:00 PM PST by Alberta's Child ("There's somebody new and he sure ain't no rodeo man.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson