RE: Remy’s “Opinion of Counsel”.
Finally! Someone references the plenary position of the Constitution as stated in Marbury v Madison!
The US Constitution lays moot the Constitutions of the States at this time and place.
This is a well composed opinion and, as if it matters, I agree with it 100%.
The upshot of that opinion is that if Pence were to take the route decided, it would be an Article II act and NOT subject to any SCOTUS review.
The only other action is for Pence to adjourn for a time-certain and hand the “certifications” back to the States to heal (re-certify) or nullify their elections.
One last word.
Remy is correct in saying that the Certificates are null in the States that have allowed fraud.
It is as if they don’t exist or are just powerless pieces of paper.
Personal Slide (so scroll on by): Marbury v. Madison was picked apart as a project for my first year pre-Law class.
My class-partner?
The now Senator Gary Peters.
We received the highest possible grade for our work.
WOW-impressed by your personal slide. 👍😎
:: it would be an Article II act and NOT subject to any SCOTUS review. ::
I meant it was an Article 1 act.
Even, as presiding officer, Pence will be acting in an Article 1 capacity.
There is no conflict of interest or mingling of powers.
Excellent analysis !
Many thankQs for this post, and post 1013!!
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3921491/posts?page=1013#1013
Wow!
Excellent analysis !
Many thankQs for this post, and post 1013!!
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3921491/posts?page=1013#1013