Replies

I highly doubt this information will even create a blip in the Biden camp or the media.
~~~~~~~~~~~~

It’s not for them, really. The president is fighting to build back in a rule by law and he does this by telling the people the reasons for his actions before he takes them.

The left/Biden will shut it down, but there’s no point in fighting to re-instill the rule of law if you can’t be bothered to give the people who aren’t shut down evidence, show them WHY.

President Trump’s approach has succeeded in leading Dems to cross the aisle to join his side.That wouldn’t happen if he hadn’t made his case in the court of public opinion.

The Poroshenko content will lay a legal foundation (the speaker said all content presented in the video would literally be place into the hands of the foreign countries involved as soon as the presentation ends. I know our courts are corrupt - we hang on and change that, we don’t give up on collecting and sharing evidence.

SO the US has foreign allies on board now, and takes the hand off of evidence, now the Americans know where it came from and have had a chance to hear the reasoning of those who collected it. The presentation was solid in this regard.

I believe our courts are corrupt and that evidence may be given to the courts to review and reject, it will be protected until a clean court, likely a military tribunal, is established.

We don’t give up ever until cases like Biden’s see justice. Giving up before then means we become Venezuela.

Saying it does no good, evidence doesn’t matter anymore is volunteering to lose when you don’t have to. Winning is worth the extra work it will take.

I don’t understand the impulse to locate threads like ours that are preparing to push, protest, restore the rule of law only to insist that it’s not worth it, won’t change anything. There are other threads on the forum for that.

Very well put.

Yes, I agree to get this out into the public.

I was expressing the disappointments we have suffered, from the courts mostly.

Perhaps you’re correct. If Trump prevails this info can move forward.
If Trump does not prevail, the world will see and know what they’re now dealing with.

Either way, you’re correct, it’s a win.

Simple RN, they come for attention - everybody knows what its like to volley off a bunch of posts and not a single reply. And beyond the trees most threads are increasingly a Woe is Us echo chamber.

Attention trolls are certain to get responses here and even if those are angry rebukes it doesn’t matter — any reply satisfies the need for attention

So multiple replies keep the cycle in motion.
Some regular posters here will take no guff...

It soon becomes easy to recognize which posts I can just scroll past...

***I believe our courts are corrupt and that evidence may be given to the courts to review and reject, it will be protected until a clean court, likely a military tribunal, is established***

Given the outrageous rejection of the case involving illegal election tactics in some states - a total Constitutional crisis created cowardly and unnecessarily by SCOTUS {I think we all know who specifically}... AND given the same rejection of seeing evidence in state courts, ∴ therefore
military courts may be the only vehicle for saving the Republic. Treason and denial of patriotic duty are massive!

The super rich must be held accountable also... beyond the reach of bribery and corruption.