Download it here---> Electoral Count Act of 1887
And the left is already trying to say it is "subversion". Look at Snopes ridiculous answer (this is what the MSM will play up for the sheep, guarantee it)
Does This Text Outline How to Subvert the Counting of Electoral Votes?
Mixture
About this rating
What's True
"Congress can raise objections to state-certified electoral ballots during the process of officially counting those ballots."
What's False
"Successfully mounting challenges to electoral ballots is difficult and rarely done."
Umm.. how is this false just because it is rare? And why use the term "subvert"
The whole election already WAS Subverted, MORONS!
Mark Meadows. hmmm...
That got me to thinking... which led back here. I mentioned this to someone recently. Can't remember who but I re dug
Paul Ryan and Kevin McCarthy
"It was McCarthy who made the accusation, asserting that “There’s two people I think Putin pays: Rohrabacher and Trump,” prompting Ryan to cut him off an insist that the matter never be publicly discussed (link).
Ryan responded by asserting through a spokesman that the exchange never happened, and then after learning there was a recording of it, changed his story and asserted that it had merely been a joke.
But the timing of the conversation suggests otherwise.
Originally here ---> House majority leader to colleagues in 2016: ‘I think Putin pays’ Trump
Paul Ryan Keeps It All in the Family
May 18, 2017
"In the Post piece, McCarthy’s remark is met with laughter, and Ryan cautions his colleagues, “This is an off the record . . . No leaks! . . . All right?”
"And then, amid more laughter, Ryan says, “This is how we know we’re a real family here.”"
“That’s how you know that we’re tight,” Steve Scalise, the House Majority Whip, says.
“What’s said in the family stays in the family,” Ryan concludes.
"Spokesmen for the various parties at first denied that the conversation took place. But when the Post apprised them of the audiotape, they went into an oh-well-it-was-just-a-joke mode."
"Another participant, Evan McMullin, an ex-C.I.A. operative, who ran for President last year as an independent, confirmed to the Post that the conversation took place. He attended as the policy director of the House Republican Conference."
"In the transcript published by the Post, McCarthy speculates that the Russians hacked the Democratic National Committee’s computers and, in the process, discovered whatever opposition-research materials the Democrats had gathered on Trump."
Question. Was Mark Meadows there?
He was a "Freedom Caucus" member...
AND, he has his own ambitions for 2024:
"In October 2020, Meadows was mentioned in a Washington Post article as a potential candidate in the 2024 Republican presidential primary"
My note: Anyone who pushes that it was the Russians who hacked the DNC is a derp in my book.
Any vote, illegally cast, manufactured, or inserted - whether it represents a real voter or not- invalidates ALL ballots it is mingled with.
Because of the anonymity of the voting process, once inserted, an improper/illegal ballot can not be specifically determined AFTER the the ballots are cast.
the act is lost to time.
For this action, the entire precinct is invalidated.
This then should not be seen as the challenger/inspector disenfranchising all the ballots legal cast.
It is simply, the illegal ballots that disenfranchise the whole.
Since the illegal ballots cannot be physically removed from the “cast ballot” universe, no one person or group can be held accountable for inserting the illegal ballot.
The proper remedy is to invalidate the entire precinct where fraud is determined.
All other legal remedies to determine culpability will necessarily fail.
Attempting to adjudicate “blame” through the courts is a lesson in frustration.
Each and every legal action should request relief through precinct invalidation.
“Blame” and culpability will fall within the purview of the individual State legislature ; they make the laws AND administer the election process.
It is no fault of the voter that they abdicated their administrative aspect to criminals.
THIS CAME FROM YOU SNOPES LINK:
As outlined in the 12th Amendment, the House votes by state delegations to choose the president if no candidate receives a majority of electoral votes.
But for the purpose of determining whether to uphold objections to the counting of electoral votes, the House votes as a body with individual members each casting a vote.
***************
I’m going to have to research tomorrow to see if this is true. DemonKKKrats will not vote for pubbie electors, so I hope this is not true.