The development creates the vaccine. The testing must occur on cells in culture before human trials can commence. There is a vast difference.
Again I am not one to argue the judgments. I hs e presented the facts as I understand them.
If the testing on cells from culture was performed on cells derived from an aborted individual, and then that testing was used for development using cells disparate or separate, then the extended result is not one of physical participation in innocent bloodshed, but a participation in principle nonetheless. Does that make sense? I’m not into making unjust accusations, but am obligated to make ethical considerations.