Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Fester Chugabrew

It’s extensively posted. There is a renal cel line from an aborted child in 1972. The reason for the abortion was not listed and it was in France.

This cell lines was used indirectly in the testing of the vaccine but no aborted cell lines were used in the development or the creation of Pfizer or moderna

So a cultured cell line thousands of generations removed from the original cells in 1972 were used

These are the facts. The judgments surrounding these facts are up to the individual.


267 posted on 12/21/2020 7:49:11 PM PST by gas_dr (Trial lawyers AND POLITICIANS are Endangering Every Patient in America: INCLUDING THEIR LIBERTIES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies ]


To: gas_dr

This cell line was used indirectly in the testing of the vaccine but no aborted cell lines were used in the development or the creation of Pfizer or moderna


Begs the question: What is the difference between testing and development? The two are not easily separated. Both are necessary, i.e. co-dependent. How does one understand that partaking of this vaccine in no way invokes the shedding of innocent blood?


268 posted on 12/21/2020 8:01:12 PM PST by Fester Chugabrew (I'd rather have a rude President than a polite tyrant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson