Those were Tweets from Rudy Giuliani earlier today, on PA RINOs in their state legislature.
Key points.
1) from the 2nd of the Tweets. Notice that Rudy Giuliani, in his own name, in public, is using the words "Democrat crimes."
That is actionable against him. But truth is a universal defense to libel.
This implies the accuracy of Q's "We have it all."
2) from the earlier article I posted
Court order, state GOP leaders effectively end Trump’s dreams of legislative reversal of Pa.’s election results
the legislators were quoted as saying:
“The General Assembly lacks the authority to take action to overturn the popular vote and appoint our own slate of presidential electors,” it read. “While we clearly recognize the need for legislative action to address the issues presented by the 2020 General Election, some of the actions requested by our residents would require us to disregard the statutes and Constitution we have fought so hard to protect.”
But notice this post (admittedly hearsay at the moment) from about an hour ago on thedonald.win:
I saw this on social media from someone in PA, in regards to PA rules/response from their Speaker Cutler:
The Legislature does not certify election results; the Department of State and individual counties certify elections and we have notified our congressional delegation regarding some of the procedural failures.
We cannot call members to a special session during the month of December. The governor can only make that call now that our session is over.
We cannot unilaterally seat our own presidential electors. It is prohibited in the Pennsylvania Constitution (Article 7, Sec 13). The only way that changes is if the court would order us to seat electors, as some lawsuits that are currently pending would ask us to do.
We are the elected voice of Pennsylvania’s residents, and we will carry your voices into every decision we make.
What about point 1, is that true? I thought it was otherwise. Any knowledgable important here? I am curious.
See the third underlined part, "The only way that changes is if the court would order us to seat electors, as some lawsuits that are currently pending would ask us to do."
Say Hello to ACB and the Supremes!