Posted on 12/03/2020 12:35:56 PM PST by RandFan
@Maximus_4EVR
FYI SCOTUS Update
- Can't confirm yet, but RNC source is saying SCOTUS to take Kelly/Parnell case; Five Justices agree to hear.
This is unconfirmed.
IMHO I do expect Alito to grant injunction.
Keep Praying.
@Maximus_4EVR
*Same source "Justice Roberts" is firmly opposed to "hearing" case.
We should have word in coming hours. Maybe by morning.
I hope I'm right more about this than all others
(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...
F*** Roberts. Which he’d probably like.
Roberts is the globalists tool. He’s there to pretend to be conservative while actually serving George Soros and the IMF.
How much longer will John Roberts pretend that he’s not being blackmailed by the Obama/Clinton cartel ?
The Supreme Court justices should get triple their usual security protection if the court takes this or any other election fraud case.
John Roberts?
Never heard of him.
Is he some kind of male stripper?
Roberts opposed?
yawn
[[*Same source “Justice Roberts” is firmly opposed to “hearing” case. ]]
IF this is true- Can a justice be impeached for failure to do their job?
let’s start calling him Big Bad John!
I gave up years ago giving that scumbag the benefit of the doubt.
He either engaged in sexual abuse of young children or is a closeted homosexual.
Whatever it is, he is beholden to someone.
And it isn’t his wife.
Highly unlikely an ”RNC source” would have this knowledge. The Court almost never experiences leaks. This is someone’s guess and nothing more.
Of course he is. Thank God for ACB.
It will also be the next lowest electoral vote margin in history (after the 1876 election) and prove an important point. Namely, that fraud did occur and at least two states did the right thing by exposing it.
“Kinda narrah at the shoulder an’ broad at the hip.....” if ya git my meaning....
“Kinda narrah at the shoulder an’ broad at the hip.....” if ya git my meaning....
It’s already known that Roberts despises President Trump. Little surprise that he’s against revealing the fraud in this election.
There you have it. Roberts is compromised. He should step down, spend more time with his family (which he purchased).
*
Of course he is - he’s not for the United States or constitutional law.
He’s in it for the 1%
Is anyone surprised that Bush appointee Roberts would vote against
a hearing in PA lawsuit?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.