“[Disclaimer: SCOTUSblog and Election Law at Ohio State are nonpartisan and do not endorse, support or oppose any candidate, campaign or party.]”
Post this in humor.
Good resource. Thanks for posting!
Careful with SCOTUSBlog, the twitter account is run by a never Trump flipping out over the implication of fraud. I finally blocked them.
All I see here are procedural cases, trying to stop or allowing to open voting laws. Mostly last minute changes claimed to accommodate coronavirus.
Obviously the last minute changes were put there by dems to allow cheating.
E.g. Here in AZ, a judge suddenly, on the deadline date, extended registration deadline. Why? It actually created huge mess in the registration and obvious potential for fraud. No doubt about it. But that’s hard case to argue for change the in voting results. Basically easy to dismiss arguing - well, we messed up, sorry.
I do not see in the list any lawsuit like:
We observed stealing votes in ..., here are the witnesses, documents.
These would be hard to dismiss and good reasons to change the results.
Correct me if I missed something.
OHIO PING!
Please let me know if you want on or off the Ohio Ping list.
Ohio State anchors it.....
2020 Election Litigation Tracker
SCOTUSblog ^ | November 30, 2020 | Staff
Posted on 12/1/2020, 5:26:54 AM by Be Careful