Posted on 12/01/2020 2:26:54 AM PST by Be Careful
Welcome to the 2020 Election Litigation Tracker, a joint project of Election Law at Ohio State and SCOTUSblog. During the 2020 election season, we will provide up-to-date information on major election law cases as they make their way through every level of the court system. Our goal is to serve as a resource on election law and administration for the general public, lawyers, educators, journalists and policymakers. You can read all of our previous election-related coverage here. [Disclaimer: SCOTUSblog and Election Law at Ohio State are nonpartisan and do not endorse, support or oppose any candidate, campaign or party.]
(Excerpt) Read more at scotusblog.com ...
“[Disclaimer: SCOTUSblog and Election Law at Ohio State are nonpartisan and do not endorse, support or oppose any candidate, campaign or party.]”
Post this in humor.
Good resource. Thanks for posting!
Careful with SCOTUSBlog, the twitter account is run by a never Trump flipping out over the implication of fraud. I finally blocked them.
All I see here are procedural cases, trying to stop or allowing to open voting laws. Mostly last minute changes claimed to accommodate coronavirus.
Obviously the last minute changes were put there by dems to allow cheating.
E.g. Here in AZ, a judge suddenly, on the deadline date, extended registration deadline. Why? It actually created huge mess in the registration and obvious potential for fraud. No doubt about it. But that’s hard case to argue for change the in voting results. Basically easy to dismiss arguing - well, we messed up, sorry.
I do not see in the list any lawsuit like:
We observed stealing votes in ..., here are the witnesses, documents.
These would be hard to dismiss and good reasons to change the results.
Correct me if I missed something.
OHIO PING!
Please let me know if you want on or off the Ohio Ping list.
Ohio State anchors it.....
2020 Election Litigation Tracker
SCOTUSblog ^ | November 30, 2020 | Staff
Posted on 12/1/2020, 5:26:54 AM by Be Careful
Are you aware that the AZ Legislature passed a Law that only a relative could turn in a ballot for someone else? An Obama judge put a stay on that LAW, so it wouldn’t affect this election. The Leftist judiciary is part and parcel of the destruction of this country. Someone should clue in John Roberts that there ARE DEMOCRAT JUDGES. (But obviously there aren’t Republican judges or we wouldn’t be in the state of collapse that we now find ourselves)
Yes. After previous bad experiences with ballot harvesting, AZ legislature passed a law outlawing the practice. However there is no penalty! You can challenge people bringing in piles of ballots, but you cannot really stop them! Anyway, what prevents harvesters from just dumping the ballots in the mail or in the unmanned collection boxes!
It is lib, but this is an accurate list.
Note what is missing, and what I keep harping on:
The three cases that matter are the combo of the two in PA (Ds vs SoS and Trump vs SoS) and these are both an absentee ballots.
The MI case, likewise is on absentees and lateness, as is the GA case.
The #s in GA suggest the result “could” overturn the GA election result, but I have yet to see any #s from anyone on how many absentees are affected in PA and MI if Trump’s side wins. If you have those, please post. In MI, it needs to be over 140,000. Very doubtful. No one knows the number in PA, which is why it may end up in the USSC.
Reminder: We need all three to deny Biteme the 270. Two won’t do it. We need four to elevate Trump above 270.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.