Skip to comments.
DannyTN's summary of Sidney Powell's GA filing
Self ^
| 11/26/2020
| DannyTN
Posted on 11/26/2020 9:31:15 AM PST by DannyTN
The link leads to the full filing. The summary below is my own.
Here is my summary of the counts in Sidney's Georgia filing, I may have missed some. Especially count 5 where I stopped after a lot seemed repetitive. I also did not try to capture all of the estimated counts in the filing. The request for relief at the end was not summarized and posted verbatum.
Count 1 Defendents violated the Elections Clause and 42 U.S.C Rule changes and cure procedures conflict with state legislation.
This count includes
- workers not following procedures when counting,
- mail-in ballots sent to people who had not requested them,
- votes from people who had moved out of state
Count 2 Denial of Equal Protection. Secretary of State and Georgia counties violated the 14th Amendment, 42 U.S.C. § 1983
This count includes
- Opening ballots prior to election day in violation of legislative statute,
- improper procedures with lack of auditable logs,
- a large number of identical pristine ballots that were likely fraudulent,
- breach of chain of custody of voting machines the night before the election,
- failure to treat voters in all counties the same,
- the banning of observers,
- not allowing observers to review all envelopes,
- use of Dominion Democracy Suite software,
- workers switching votes from Trump to Biden,
- allowing ineligible ballots to be counted,
- use of Dominion software which allowed eligible ballots to be switched between candidates or lost altogether.
Count 3 Denial of Due Process 14th Amendment § 1983 Disparate treatment of Absentee/Mail-In Voters among different counties.
subjecting one class of voters to greater burdens or scrutiny than another.
Count 4 Denial of Due Process on the Right to Vote 14th Amendment Art 1 § 4, CL. 1; Art II § 1, Cl.2; Amend 16 U.S.C. § 1983.
This count includes all previous allegations,
- failure to count legal votes,
- failure to count votes free from distortion by illegal votes,
- failure to verify signatures,
- abnormally low signature rejection rate compared to states which have had mail-in voting for years.
Count 5 There was Wide-Spread Ballot Fraud OCGA 21-2-522
This count includes all previous paragraphs.
- Enough irregular ballots exist to put the election in doubt.
- Glitches in the Dominion system have uniform effect of hurting Trump and helping Biden.
- Fraudulent acts show votes being switched from Trump to Biden during the recount,
- lack of procedures to follow the election code,
- use of Dominion despite evidence of serious vulnerabilities,
- misrepresentations about a pipe burst that sent everyone home,
- while some poll workers remained and kept working on the machines,
- failure to maintain logs on the voting system for a genuine and sound audit,
- ballots received that were never requested,
- third parties voted an untold number of unlawfully acquired absentee or mail-in ballots,
- 20,311 voters had registered as having moved out of state,
- at least 96,600 mail-in ballots were fraudulently cast,
- 136,098 ballots were illegally counted as a result of improper manipulation of the Dominion software,
- mail in ballots were requested by 3rd parties or sent erroneously to persons and voted fraudulently,
- undetected by a failed system of signature verification
For these reasons, Plaintiff asks this Court to enter a judgment in their favor and provide the following emergency relief:
- 1. An order directing Governor Kemp, Secretary Raffensperger and the Georgia State Board of Elections to de-certify the election results;
- 2. An order enjoining Governor Kemp from transmitting the currently certified election results to the Electoral College;
- 3. An order requiring Governor Kemp to transmit certified election results that state that President Donald Trump is the winner of the election; 101
- 4. An immediate order to impound all the voting machines and software in Georgia for expert inspection by the Plaintiffs.
- 5. An order that no votes received or tabulated by machines that were not certified as required by federal and state law be counted.
- 6. A declaratory judgment declaring that Georgia Secretary of State Rule 183-1-14-0.9-.15 violates the Electors and Elections Clause, U.S. CONST. art. I, § 4;
- 7. A declaratory judgment declaring that Georgia’s failed system of signature verification violates the Electors and Elections Clause by working a de facto abolition of the signature verification requirement;
- 8. A declaratory judgment declaring that current certified election results violates the Due Process Clause, U.S. CONST. Amend. XIV;
- 9. A declaratory judgment declaring that mail-in and absentee ballot fraud must be remedied with a Full Manual Recount or statistically valid sampling that properly verifies the signatures on absentee ballot envelopes and that invalidates the certified results if the recount or sampling analysis shows a sufficient number of ineligible absentee ballots were counted; 102
- 10. An emergency declaratory judgment that voting machines be Seized and Impounded immediately for a forensic audit—by plaintiffs’ expects;
- 11. A declaratory judgment declaring absentee ballot fraud occurred in violation of Constitutional rights, Election laws and under state law;
- 12. A permanent injunction prohibiting the Governor and Secretary of State from transmitting the currently certified results to the Electoral College based on the overwhelming evidence of election tampering;
- 13. Immediate production of 36 hours of security camera recording of all rooms used in the voting process at State Farm Arena in Fulton County, GA from 12:00am to 3:00am until 6:00pm on November 3.
- 14. Plaintiffs further request the Court grant such other relief as is just and proper, including but not limited to, the costs of this action and their reasonable attorney fees and expenses pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1988.
TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: depositvanityfeenow; elections; voterfraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 last
To: RummyChick
Agree. Standing is big issue. Surprising too. She must know that.
81
posted on
11/26/2020 12:52:05 PM PST
by
amihow
( nded with all the necessity )
To: DannyTN
Pretty sure the plan from the beginning was for SCOTUS to rule on it which would also affect other states as a precedent.
82
posted on
11/26/2020 12:52:26 PM PST
by
Boomer
(Leftists/Leftism ruins everything it touches. Leftism is a moral pestilence.)
To: DannyTN
83
posted on
11/26/2020 12:52:42 PM PST
by
jetson
(chiwowa)
To: DannyTN
84
posted on
11/26/2020 12:54:46 PM PST
by
ADSUM
( )
To: RummyChick
85
posted on
11/26/2020 1:32:54 PM PST
by
Salamander
(Call them by their true name: Pedocrats.)
To: Boomer
There are many different ways “no rule of law” can play out, none of them good.
The late Roman Empire collapsed without a true “civil war”, for example.
The population just started withdrawing from the Roman state in a thousand different ways.
At the end, when the Barbarians finally showed up, the Romans just refused to fight them, figuring they were no worse than the central government.
86
posted on
11/26/2020 1:36:12 PM PST
by
cgbg
( Remember 1876--we _can_ do this!--Biden--Office of the Prisoner-Elect)
To: damper99
So what would you have done to stop election fraud?
87
posted on
11/26/2020 1:56:46 PM PST
by
SecAmndmt
(Arm yourselves!)
To: DannyTN
too bad attorneys can’t do this.
You would think a nice summary would help their cases. I got to believe a judge would appreciate it.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
there should be a “one page” limit
h/t on the nice job you did to summarize 104 pages.
it was everything I needed to know.
88
posted on
11/26/2020 2:12:26 PM PST
by
thinden
To: Steve_Seattle
89
posted on
11/26/2020 2:41:28 PM PST
by
BiteYourSelf
( Earth first we'll strip mine the other planets later.)
To: ADSUM
Yes, but I believe they couched it as: Republicans are more likely to vote in person, the results of which will likely be in by election night, whereas Democrats are more likely to vote by mail (especially in light of COVID), & those results may take several days to count. Thus painting the picture of a gradual Biden comeback in each swing state, that appeared fair & legal. And of course the liberal sheeple bought this theory hook, line, & sinker. I’ve communicated with a lefty on social media who swears by this hypothesis & refuses to see an iota of fraud.
Speaking of which: of the 800 books, movies, & documentaries we’re going to see about this election in the coming years, I hope some investigative types are able to uncover who all had foreknowledge of the scheme, even if they weren’t in on it. Did Chris Wallace really think it was a water leak in an Atlanta precinct that stopped the counting for the night, or did he know the truth? And what about the Dem Senators & their ridiculous behavior during the ACB hearings? How many of them knew what was to come? Etc etc...
90
posted on
11/26/2020 3:35:20 PM PST
by
splash73
To: DannyTN
I believe the pdf we see is the rough draft. I am sure it has been cleaned up and submitted in better form.
91
posted on
11/26/2020 3:53:23 PM PST
by
jonrick46
(Cultural Marxism is the cult of the Left waiting for the Mothership.)
To: DannyTN
92
posted on
11/26/2020 5:13:28 PM PST
by
NetAddicted
(Just looking)
To: DannyTN
“I imagine that the lawyers for the defendants get to file a response ...”
Informative. Thanks!
To: Steve_Seattle
On another site, someone mentioned the mysterious “water leak” that supposedly occurred in the arena where votes were being counted in Fulton County. The building was supposedly evacuated because of that, but someone claims that some Democrat operatives were allowed to remain inside, unsupervised. Anyone know the facts about this?
That is referenced in the filing. The local reports are that the “water main break” was one overflowing/leaking toilet. The citation says 6 people remained, then 3 people.
94
posted on
11/26/2020 8:52:18 PM PST
by
lepton
("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
To: RummyChick
Of course, Woods is back in the game now on appeal.
To: 9YearLurker
He has to answer their questions citing law to back him up as compared to the law they cited.
We will see what he has
96
posted on
11/27/2020 7:10:18 AM PST
by
RummyChick
(I blame Kushner.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson