Sidney Powell: Every red candidate anywhere who lost by less than 6% should be filing suit now

Twitter ^

[MNDude]

"Here's the outline of the great fr@ud against this country. Every red candidate anywhere who lost by less than 6% should be filing suit now or joining existing suit."

[Getready]

They have been systematically stealing elections for years. That is why there are so many democratic fools in our government. Would not be surprised if many RINO’s either.Got much easier with computers...

[reasonisfaith]

You state “I know she should not try her case in the press,” then you ask that she try her case in the press.

[Starboard]

Yes, oddly specific. Might have something to do with some of the vote adjusting algorithms.

[tballard56]

The problem is that most Republicans have been conditioned to just roll over and take it. I doubt many will step up and dispute the election, no matter how justified. Don’t want to upset anyone, ya know!

[RideForever]

If we have the tech to send ballots to an overseas server to be reallocated/ counted and returned to US, then we should be able to scan the ballots for saving with the voters’ registration records. That way voters can confirm their vote really reflects what they cast in the last election.

[Robert DeLong]

Yes, John James was leading that Michigan US Senate race up until that point when they stopped counting, and if I remember correctly, by a large margin.

[CMB_polarization]

Hunter promised Joe 10%...

[drypowder]

The $10,000 question is “what to do with Judges who refuse to hear and dismiss these law suits challenging the 2020 election results?”

[line drive to right]

I was sadly thinking that maybe sincere people such as Sydney, Rudy and Lin Wood have become desperate in their hopes. But then I realized that their claims — and remember that it would be folly to show their cards now — are more believable than what we’ve seen that we KNOW happened: the mathematically improbable vote swings in only the places that most mattered; the unprecedented behavior of election officials In denying observers their rights, etc. We would’ve never believed those things could happen, virtually in simultaneous duplication. But we saw those things happen.

[con-surf-ative]

No, I don’t ask her to try her case in the press. I ask her to inform us of what facts she will be able to introduce into evidence, e.g. we have found specific computer code that flips votes, we have a numerous signatures that do not match, we have emails or text messages directing election officials to do things . . . I don’t expect her to tell us what the code says or show the signatures, but thus far all we have heard is crap like “ I’m going to release the kraken!” Either release it or be quiet.

Although I am 100% confident this election was the result of fraud and impropriety, in an election challenge, votes have to be shown improper one vote at a time. It is a very painstaking process. I cannot imagine they can do that in enough cases to flip the election.

[TXnMA]

"You can’t file suit without any evidence Sydney.
Thanks for not revealing any evidence anyone could use Sydney."

~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Another lazy-@$$3d FReeper! DO SOME RESEARCH, YOURSELF -- and, don't sit on your rump, whining to be spoon-fed like a toddler!

You might start with https://newrightnetwork.com/2020/11/exclusive-stopthesteal-evidence-dump-proof-of-voter-fraud-in-17-states.html/...

The algorithm is simple: set the percentage margin you want your (Dem) candidate to win by -- and let the [ADJUSTED] vote count fall where it will...

Any further questions? Well -- seek your own answers!

TXnMA   
  

[PA Presbyterian]

If this can be found as a pattern in these elections and that after each and every pause across every state where the elections were expected to be close, Republicans lost votes and Democrats gained them, that is a clear indication of widespread, systemic, deliberate vote tampering and fraud.

I remember someone on this forum a few days ago posted a Democrat email or social media post where a phrase was repeated again and again. I should have saved the link and didn’t. Do you all know what happened on D-Day? BBC radio repeated a code phrase over and over again. It was meant as a signal to the French resistance that the invasion was coming and that now was the time to launch a coordinated campaign to blow up bridges and Nazi weapons depots and anything else to thwart the enemy.

Did the Democrats use a code phrase to alert their minions to unleash the vote fraud across the country? How did it happen simultaneously if indeed it did? Can somebody find the post I saw on FR earlier?

[rlmorel]

Except that election fraud appears to be a one way ratchet for Leftists.

I would be astonished to find any more than a single case of a Republican involved in “voter fraud” in an isolated event.

Democrats involved in “election fraud” are an epidemic, I am sure at all levels.

Any Republicans who lost would likely have no issues with the results being closely examined.

[CMB_polarization]

Can’t be too close to 0% to justify recount, also accounting for uncertainty that some remaining counts go for Trump.

[ASOC]

yeah

Sid talks a good game.

*Results* on the other hand, are not to be seen.

I wonder what she charges the the TV folks for an appearance?

[PGR88]

OK. never mind.