Posted on 11/11/2020 6:34:51 PM PST by ransomnote
Dominion collusion?
1st arrest...Richard Blum?
But yeah, Hannity is annoying. But I don't see Cavuturd or the other traitor Walla$$, talking over... I mean talking with Sara Carter, John Solomon, Gen. Flynn, etc.
Libertarian is the most consistent every cycle. I’d say look at that and there should be a certain leeway and consistency even with TDS included. I’m hearing that they siphoned 3% so it wouldn’t be as noticable. However, mistakes are made...
https://www.theblaze.com/op-ed/horowitz-state-legislatures-rectify-election-fraud
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1876_United_States_presidential_election
https://theconversation.com/congress-could-select-the-president-in-a-disputed-election-149580
The congress can choose by state delegations and we have at least 30 of them if the elections are in dispute and the electoral votes are in question. It’s a one vote per state process. The Senate chooses the VP.
A question has been raised by some though whether both candidates can be set aside and others chosen.
You can call me a troll if you wish but a review of my long posting history should convince you otherwise.
You sound like a shill for Hannity. We’re all
entitled to our own opinion...think for ourselves.
Bezos (who has been strangely quiet) owns the largest, by number, group of servers in the world.
Who owns The Cloud?
Who supplies the technology [OS]?
You’re missing the point.
It’s not *whether* the states choose, but *from among whom* they may choose.
They can’t go picking dark horses out of their ass.
It’s going downhill fast!
“They will not be able to walk down the STREET.”
You and mbrfl are true Americans. As Patton said, Americans love to fight. Focus on the enemy though, or we all die and WWG1WGA
But yeah, Hannity is annoying. But I don’t see Cavuturd or the other traitor Walla$$, talking over... I mean talking with Sara Carter, John Solomon, Gen. Flynn, etc.
*************************
Thanks for your advice Ymani. Will slide out of that
slide for the good of others.
I wasn’t talking about electors changing their votes. I was talking about a scenario where no candidate gets a majority of votes or the congress feels that there has been mischief making that cannot be worked thru. The Congress chooses the president by a per state vote which will favor Trump. It happened in 1876 and there were issues in the earliest elections. The Senate chooses the VP
I can’t find out if the VP is also chosen by a per state vote or if the Senate chooses from a simple majority. The President though gets chosen by the number of state delegations. Can a different person be chosen in stead? Theoretically it’s possible.
I think the fraud happened and has so tainted the presidential races that a Congressional house vote by means of one vote per state will be the only way to solve it. The VP gets chosen by the Senate.
Just my thought during ketchup this morning.
Seems a good way to glean votes is to algorithmically suppress the 3rd party percentages to their historic levels.
Makes it difficult to spot.
I am hoping you provided that for my use in conversation with my governorette.
That it was not meant directly at me.
Who was it who said there are way more trannies in important positions than we know?
Get some coffee and start enjoying Friday the 13th!
.
...just for the sake of the pun.
And the breathtaking visuals.
Hannity has been a target since 9/11. Imagine the abuse he and his family have suffered since then. IMHO we need ALL the voices that are supportive to Trump the Titan, to fight this huge battle. I cut him slack even though I don’t listen to FOXnews.
Maybe thats why we were pointed to U.S. vs. Throckmorton. We’ll see. Get lots of popcorn. It’s gonna be biblical.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
