Hacked elections have no integrity. The state governments for impacted states may need to override the fake vote counts in order to certify the real winners. Or they may need a special election that does not use the vulnerable systems.
Around the 33 minute mark is one concise demonstration of vote switching by the digital program.
Bashear gains 560 votes at the same instant Bevin loses 560 votes. It happens in less than a second right before the viewers eyes.
This is the best video on the subject that I have seen. YouTube already has it flagged. I assume it will be gone in less than an hour.
Thanks for posting this. I watched it last night. It’s long. Nearly an hour, but worth viewing.
Face it, the US is a bannana republic. Only suckers vote in the presidential races only to watch those races stolen cycle after cycle by the criminal Democrats. The system is a joke.
“This is how 100,000+ fake votes can appear at 3 a.m.”
And, you might add, all for Biden and none for Trump. And also might add - NO DOWN VOTES!
BKMRK.
This is prima facie proof to me, I sent it to a software engineer who lives in the UK and his response was that it was not compelling and reeked of conspiracy theory. Not that I give a s#it what UK people think of our politics but it just shows how widespread the brainwashing has become, blindng otherwise smart people just because the name Trump is attached to it.
Tip: You can increase the speed of most youtube videos to watch faster.
Hover your mouse over the video. Click the sprocket/gear icon at the bottom right of the video. Select “Playback Speed”, then select a speed option to watch slower or faster.
Didn’t have time to watch the video, but assuming this is true (no reason to doubt it is), wouldn’t a recount of paper ballots then be TOTALLY out of whack with the “reported” counts?
I get that the reported total can be changed electronically. That said, when you generate a new total from a manual re-scan of the ballots, those two totals should then be totally different from each other.
Geez, all the crazy cyber tech is screwing us five ways from Sunday. It’s a morass of sheer stupidity by shooting the data all over the world with entry points everywhere along the way.
Everyone needs to watch this video. You won't regret the time (58 minutes) spent to watch it.
For the number crunchers this is a great video. Loved it. Thanks for posting.
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1325463843565412354.html
this was happening in the RED precincts in the swing states
After finally watching this video to the end, I am depressed.
The gentleman leaves me with the impression that Gov. Abbott and the FBI blocked this from the White House.
Bump
The video is definitely worth watching (about 1 hour).
The interviewee, Russel Ramsland, is a cybersecurity expert whose company has investigated election fraud.
He first distinguishes between VOTING fraud and ELECTION fraud. VOTING fraud goes on at the precinct and voting center level. It involves manipulation of voting machines, handling of paper ballots, and such. ELECTION fraud is what happens at the county and state levels where results are tabulated and posted to databases for recording, analysis, and reporting.
The video mainly addresses ELECTION fraud. It is based on data gotten from two counties in Texas. He says the data logs show many discrepancies that deserve further investigation. It gets kind of technical, but he shows how the data, once it is posted to the servers, can be manipulated in many ways. He is critical of the lack of security of the system, which is run by a company in Barcelona with data on servers in Frankfurt. He says the entire backend of the system can be manipulated by election officials at the county and state levels, and that it could be hacked by anyone with the technical know-how. He provides examples of how it can be done.
At one point in the video, he shows a news media clip frame-by-frame that clearly show votes being switched from one candidate to another.
He also discusses and shows how the database can be used to compare early and mail-in voting results with election-night results to project the number of votes needed to guarantee a win for a particular candidate.
He says he has tried to show his findings to the FBI and DHS with no success.
Note: His comments are about his research and vulnerabilities of our election systems. Don't confuse his video with Hammer and Scorecard, which appears to be a deep-state tool for hacking into the kind of election system that he describes.