This is a concise and very promising analysis. It makes it very clear that although Chief Justice Roberts did not agree to render a rush ruling before the election he did not reject the case altogether. Alito’s response is very encouraging.
This morning on Fox and Friends, Jonathan Turley said that the case in Nevada could be effective in exposing the fraudulent situation with this massive mail-in voting if the Trump team presents compelling evidence of votes from the grave and out of state voters. We know that with the hit of Covid many people left Las Vegas and moved out of state, but they voted in NV. If the case proves out it can have a ripple effect in other states.
It IS a very promising analysis. And Steve Turley explains it very well.
Another interesting thing I learned: The Fake News told us that the Supreme Court passed on reviewing what the Pennsylvania Supreme Court did. Not TRUE!
According to Turley there were two cases the SC was to review and the only one SC refused to hear was the case about “expediting the decision” — not the case about what the Penn Court did!
In fact, the Supreme Court is still waiting to hear this case and Justice Thomas, Gorsuch (and one other) are eagerly waiting to hear that case!
Listen to Turley. He’s a great explainer of the complex.