Eh? The FBI? The same FBI that sat on Hunter's hard drive for a year? That FBI?
Welcome to FR, BTW...
Pay no attention to the people who think you should be zotted.
Their aim is poor...
At her staged and scripted propaganda extravaganza misnamed as a "Town Hall," Savannah Guthrie asked President Trump to disavow QAnon. I was puzzled (okay, I was hopping mad!). What was there to disavow?
This was Guthrie's statement to PT defining QAnon: “QAnon is a theory that Democrats are a Satanic pedophile ring & you are their savior. — Will you disavow?"
Breaking down her definition, according to Guthrie, QAnon has four political/social positions: (1) QAnon dislikes Democrats, (2) opposes Satanists, (3) hates pedophiles and (4) likes President Trump. What's to disavow? President Trump either agrees with or aligns with these four QAnon positions. President Trump dislikes Democrats, opposes Satanists, hates pedophiles and certainly likes himself.
Now, possibly Guthrie wanted PT to disavow QAnon because Guthrie thinks it is not true that Democrats are a Satanic pedophile ring. But, how do we know for sure? At the first debate, Joe Biden boldly proclaimed that "I am the Democratic Party." Biden is also a pedophile. There are dozens, if not scores, of photos and videos of Biden sniffing and fondling little girls in public. By logic and induction, we can infer that much worse has occurred behind closed doors.
Further, I have never heard Joe Biden ever disavow or denounce Satan, Lucifer or the Church of Satan. As such, I hereby demand that Biden disavow Satan! (Honestly, I have no idea how Biden would respond to such a demand for disavowal. But it might be cosmically comical.)
Maybe this line of attack is not politically expedient. However, stating the Truth that Bide is a pedophile might be a political killshot. In any event, there is no reason to disavow an organization that is dedicated to researching and uncovering the truth about Satanic pedophile rings. Attacking political opponents is the purpose of political and social organizations.
With respect to other reasons for disavowing QAnon, the proper response should be: "Prove it!" QAnon is accused of encouraging violence. Prove it! QAnon supports the Second Amendment -- just like PT-- but supporting the 2A is not even close to encouraging violence. QAnon seems to be "miliary" of some sort. President Trump supports our military and veterans. QAnon is supposedly a white supremacist organization. Prove it! I've never seen a post that could remotely be seen as racist or white supremacist. Finally, QAnon is supposedly a domestic terrorist organization. Again, prove it! This is the trickiest politically. The response is likely: "The FBI has labeled QAnon as a domestic terrorist organization." This was purposeful done to allow just this line of questing directed at the President and Republicans. In my view, the most politically expedient response is: "The FBI is not always right. More information is needed." Same response to the fact that House passed a resolution. "The House may have acted hastily."
One additional point: demands that one publicly disavow is a demand for obedience. These are demands that President obey, OBEY! These are demands that the President engage in rituals of compliance and protocols of humiliation.
He should paraphrase Biden: QAnon is an idea, not an organization!
IBTZ
Let’s just disavow free speech for anybody who isn’t a Left-wing extremist.
Oh wait! We’ve already done that!
“...The FBI is not always right...”
The Fey Wray and his FIB minions have been shown to be Domestic Terrorists and projectionists of the wurst order.
posted your four points on twitter - we’ll see what happens!
I don’t even know what “QAnon” is!!!! Phooey, anyway!
You seem to have missed the supposition that all democrats
and most republicans are imagined to be a part of this
evil, Satanic, baby-killing and adrenochrome-banging
group of naughty folks running the world and that they
have secret tunnels full of little Haitian kids that
they chop up and eat and sometimes spank in recently drained
swimming pools.
That’s a long way from opposing pedophiles.
Quite a distance in fact.
Media CRICKETS.
What's the QAnon death count? ONE? And I think even that is disputed.
The problem is that the enemy reads Q posts, of course. Why wouldn’t they? They know that asking about Qanon versus Q gave Trump an out.
I think this time they will ask Trump about Q versus QAnon— if they are ready to, if they deem it to be in their interest.
They may deem it to be in their interest. It’s hard to tell. We still have four days of news and developments between now and then.
And they may fall into a trap if they ask the question.
Whatever. I’m sure Trump and the Q team have wargamed how they think he should respond and Trump is going to say what Trump is going to say.
If it were me, I would make the point that the Left is so afraid of something they call a kooky conspiracy theory that they took all the YouTube channels of Q followers down and ask why they would do that instead of encouraging people to go to the channels and see how kooky the Q stuff is for themselves and have a good laugh.
I might name a couple of the people who had these Q channels, such as X22 Report, Praying Medic, RedPill 78, IPOT, and mention that now they can be found on Gab, BitChute, etc. and that maybe people should go give them a view and see what it is that the Left thinks is so kooky about them.
pretty damn good for a newbie!
Eh? The FBI? The same FBI that sat on Hunter's hard drive for a year? That FBI?
Welcome to FR, BTW...
Pay no attention to the people who think you should be zotted.
Their aim is poor...
Most of the country doesn’t know what QAnon is, and most of the few who do probably come across a few random posts to threads on sites like this one. Based on what I’ve seen, I could tell you that whatever QAnon is, it has something to do with conspiracy theories, but I couldn’t tell you who they are or what their core beliefs — if any — are. I just see a piece here, a piece there, and that’s all I know. I suspect it’s the same way with the president. It’s hard to see why this is even an issue. In fact, for the vast majority of Americans it isn’t.
A very interesting post(s). Thanks to every poster.