The #hadenoughofthisbscommiecrap group. They want violence post election, they'll get it. They are because of foreign influence illegal/unprivileged combatants, they have ZERO rights to participate in these activities and are afforded NO rights in the ensuing melee. That ma'am is Federal Law.
xone wrote:
“
“Curious to know what movement is advocating that?”
The #hadenoughofthisbscommiecrap group. They want violence post election, they’ll get it. They are because of foreign influence illegal/unprivileged combatants, they have ZERO rights to participate in these activities and are afforded NO rights in the ensuing melee. That ma’am is Federal Law.”
Are those #hadenough... guys non-citizens stirring up $h!t & advocating violence??
If so, then isn’t there something like Law of Armed Combatants that addresses this?
And who is behind those #hadenough... guys?
The #hadenoughofthisbscommiecrap group. They want violence post election, they’ll get it. They are because of foreign influence illegal/unprivileged combatants, they have ZERO rights to participate in these activities and are afforded NO rights in the ensuing melee. That ma’am is Federal Law.
~~~~~~~~~~~
Could they start their own thread? ‘Cause Q Anon is being falsely portrayed as “dangerous” in the House and MSM and using this thread to support the generalized violence advocated by hadenoughofthisbscommiecrap group would needlessly smear the Q Anon peeps.
Q Anon doesn’t advocate violence and is being unfairly censored on the web; we’re lucky we have a home. This is Jim’s house - we can pick up after ourselves and avoid being boorish guests. Why contribute to the false perception being pedaled by Pelosi/MSM?
The violent videos we’ve seen over the past months are psyops on a number of levels and the hadenoughofthisbscommiecrap group appears to be taking the bait.
The punk in the linked video clip was treated as a symbolic target- a stand in for other thugs we’ve seen committing violent anarchist crimes elsewhere. But this punk hadn’t actually done anything worth punching. This attack is similar to BLM attacking white drivers as symbols of racism encountered elsewhere committed by other people.
Trump/Q are fighting to instill the rule of law and none of their tactics involved civil war - street violence. None of their strategies involve unprovoked violence against soft targets standing holding signs.
:: violence post election ::
THIS is what us tough boys are discussing.